Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mader Levap said:
Aren't you obtuse. My context was varwoche's notion about (im)plausibility of campaigners working on this very forum. But hey, whatever allows you to feel important.
Click to expand...

I am not sure piling on "context" is going to save you here, because presumably everyone here can read that context and what ever point you thought you were making was patently ridiculous in light of the fact that Hillary's cabal is paying trolls on the internet. unless you were simply agreeing with varwroche's comment? In that case? Good job!
 
16.5 said:
I am not sure piling on "context" is going to save you here, because presumably everyone here can read that context and what ever point you thought you were making was patently ridiculous in light of the fact that Hillary's cabal is paying trolls on the internet. unless you were simply agreeing with varwroche's comment? In that case? Good job!
Click to expand...

That is not a fact. There isn't evidence of that, yet. And no superPac has admitted to such a thing.
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
Oh for cripes sake.... We just did this like two days ago.

You obviously did not even bother googling it to look into, despite how trivially easy that is.

Open tab, Google news, correct the record, top news stories

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...trolls-attack-people-online-article-1.2613980

Easy
Click to expand...

An article that accuses them of being trolls is not the same as them admitting that Correct the Record is trolling. The only admitted thing is that the leader admitted using trolling tactics 15 years ago. Where is the admission that CTR are using trolling tactics today?
 
PhantomWolf said:
An article that accuses them of being trolls is not the same as them admitting that Correct the Record is trolling. The only admitted thing is that the leader admitted using trolling tactics 15 years ago. Where is the admission that CTR are using trolling tactics today?
Click to expand...
Don't you know, any accusation involving the Clintons is automatically raised to the level of truthiness by its very nature.
 
16.5 said:
Oh for cripes sake.... We just did this like two days ago.

You obviously did not even bother googling it to look into, despite how trivially easy that is.

Open tab, Google news, correct the record, top news stories

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...trolls-attack-people-online-article-1.2613980

Easy
Click to expand...

The article is extracting from a press release that didn't actually claim to be doing something that can be called paid trolling.

You do not have a fact. You have formed an interesting hypothesis based on the press release and previous observations. Now you need to actually gather EVIDENCE. You need to actually find an act of paid trolling.
 
Brock is paying trolls to post Hillary propaganda on the Internet, they brag about the million dollars they have to fund it in a press release, and "skeptics" claim there is no evidence.

Hillary 2016!
 
16.5 said:
Brock is paying trolls to post Hillary propaganda on the Internet, they brag about the million dollars they have to fund it in a press release, and "skeptics" claim there is no evidence.

Hillary 2016!
Click to expand...

I know nuance is not your thing, but you're being asked for evidence for your claim that people are paid to post pro-Clinton stuff on this forum. Linking to a site which links to a press release claiming to "serve as a resource for supporters looking for positive content and push-back to share with their online progressive communities" is not evidence of paying trolls to post here, or anywhere else for that matter.
 
wareyin said:
I know nuance is not your thing, but you're being asked for evidence for your claim that people are paid to post pro-Clinton stuff on this forum. Linking to a site which links to a press release claiming to "serve as a resource for supporters looking for positive content and push-back to share with their online progressive communities" is not evidence of paying trolls to post here, or anywhere else for that matter.
Click to expand...

I would accept any forum.
 
16.5 said:
Brock is paying trolls to post Hillary propaganda on the Internet, they brag about the million dollars they have to fund it in a press release, and "skeptics" claim there is no evidence.

Hillary 2016!
Click to expand...

But none of that press release says if people making posts are misrepresenting themselves or if they are using private message, etc. You are making the leap to that is what they are doing. But you need to prove it.
 
BobTheCoward said:
But none of that press release says if people making posts are misrepresenting themselves or if they are using private message, etc. You are making the leap to that is what they are doing. But you need to prove it.
Click to expand...

Actually what they admitted was sleazy enough that it ought to turn anyone's stomach.

But the fact of the matter is that if the Brock trolls are not identifying themselves as being compensated by the the Clinton Cabal, then they are misrepresenting themselves.

Correct the Record, a Brock/Goebbels Production.
 
uke2se said:
So we're talking about perceptions rather than reality then? Because reality has demonstrated that the economy does better under a Democratic administration.
Click to expand...

Of course we're talking about perceptions. It's an election year.
 
16.5 said:
Actually what they admitted was sleazy enough that it ought to turn anyone's stomach.

But the fact of the matter is that if the Brock trolls are not identifying themselves as being compensated by the the Clinton Cabal, then they are misrepresenting themselves.

Correct the Record, a Brock/Goebbels Production.
Click to expand...

They would be misrepresenting themselves. Now, produce evidence that has occurred.
 
Fudbucker said:
Of course we're talking about perceptions. It's an election year.
Click to expand...

Since the difference of perception was about 5%, it shouldn't be much of a problem getting more people to realize that the economy would do better under a Democratic administration. After all, reality is a pretty good ally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom