• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

A spanner in the AE 911 Truth works

Here are some other things that also aren't going to happen:

- A speech by Gage on Tuesday, May 3, at the Eastern Branch of the Institution of Fire Engineers in Essex

- A new official-yet-independent investigation of the collapse of Building 7.
 
The proof has been posted. If you wish to verify it - all you have to do is either email and ring Adrian Richardson GIFireE - the Eastern branch secretary of the IFE and the station officer of the Essex Fire and rescue service HQ on the phone number or email address already provided. Or, you can even verify the contact information provided by independent means also.


Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
All I wanted was for the OP to post the email. Why? It's because what he posted makes no sense.

Has the original email been posted? No.

All of the extra discussion has been for nothing. I just wanted to see the original email. That has not happened.

As others have said to you do your own verification. Wouldn't that dispell any suspicion? Of course post the response email.
 
Last edited:


I have no idea what proof Gage will be drinking at the hotel bar tomorrow instead of giving a speech at the Eastern Branch of the Institution of Fire Engineers in Essex. I suspect about 80, but maybe he prefers beer or wine instead. If you're curious you could ask him.
 
It's interesting that FF is so concerned about the possibility that the OP's email was a fake, but evinces no concern at all about the misleading description Gage provided for his talk:

This seminar is aimed at fire prevention officers, emergency responders, other professionals and MP’s/Peers. Delegates will be refreshed as to what happened on 9/11, consider recent findings, official investigations and be enlightened why the 9/11 movement exists. Delegate’s will see how the WTC building No 7, a steel frame (fire protected) Building of 47 floors located a football pitch away from the twin towers, collapsed that same afternoon in a 6 seconds freefall. Office fires and a failed steel support beam was recorded as the most likely cause. Is there a potential for UK protected buildings to collapse in the same way, if so are we prepared?

Presenter Richard Gage is the founder member of Architect & Engineers movement working closely with Firefighters for 9/11 and grieving families. Richard aims to present the latest evidence assembled, seeking a fresh investigation similar to the Hillsborough disaster of 1989. Testimony from surviving Firefighters will follow, concluded with any questions before bringing the seminar to a close. Attendees will be awarded CPD points for a joint IFPO, Fire Sector Federation and the All-Party Group event.


No mention of the "truth movement" at all, in fact he specifically dropped the related terms in the titles of the two organizations he refers to. Nothing to indicate any belief in a controlled demolition. No suggestion at all of an alternate hypothesis for the collapse. He's trying to make it look like his discussion is nothing more than an engineering analysis of a fire-induced collapse, when we all know that's not true.

Typical truther behavior. Claim everyone else is lying, while ignoring the blatant dishonesty of his fellow travelers.
 
collapsed that same afternoon in a 6 seconds freefall.

Yeah, the double lie is noted.
Closer to a 20 second long collapse sequence and only 2.25 seconds(MAX), nearer the end of that 20 seconds, and 1.8 seconds AFTER the entire structure was already moving, was at free fall.
 
It's interesting that FF is so concerned about the possibility that the OP's email was a fake,

It's also interesting that

- he is actually incapable of doing anything to check the issue by asking the sender

- while he is whining about the possibility of a fake mail he thinks we should take HIS claim about his empty inbox for real - there seems to be quite a dishonest double standard around
 
It's also interesting that

- he is actually incapable of doing anything to check the issue by asking the sender

- while he is whining about the possibility of a fake mail he thinks we should take HIS claim about his empty inbox for real - there seems to be quite a dishonest double standard around

Dishonesty and double standards are the ingredients that fuel Gage and his kind.
 
This seminar is aimed at fire prevention officers, emergency responders, other professionals and MP’s/Peers. Delegates will be refreshed as to what happened on 9/11, consider recent findings, official investigations and be enlightened why the 9/11 movement exists. Delegate’s will see how the WTC building No 7, a steel frame (fire protected) Building of 47 floors located a football pitch away from the twin towers, collapsed that same afternoon in a 6 seconds freefall. Office fires and a failed steel support beam was recorded as the most likely cause. Is there a potential for UK protected buildings to collapse in the same way, if so are we prepared?

I'd love to see their reaction when he tells them they have nothing to fear because steel building can't collapse due to fires. :rolleyes:
 
It's also interesting that

- he is actually incapable of doing anything to check the issue by asking the sender

- while he is whining about the possibility of a fake mail he thinks we should take HIS claim about his empty inbox for real - there seems to be quite a dishonest double standard around

Do we have a screen shot of this yet? It makes no sense to me (and that part is not satire)
 
Do we have a screen shot of this yet? It makes no sense to me (and that part is not satire)

It will all be moot sometime tomorrow when there will either be or not be, a presentation by Gage.

AE911T website says there will be, and has not retracted that afaik. Will they 'admit' to it after the fact and tell their followers that the event was cancelled? If it is to happen then Gage will have to be in the U.K. now or very soon. If he is there and then finds all his appearances are cancelled how will he spin the expense?
 
It's also interesting that





- he is actually incapable of doing anything to check the issue by asking the sender





- while he is whining about the possibility of a fake mail he thinks we should take HIS claim about his empty inbox for real - there seems to be quite a dishonest double standard around



To be precise, FF has not declared that he hasn't asked the sender for confirmation. In fact, it may be that confirmation of the cancellation is the reason FF is not interested in whether the talk goes ahead or not.



The only thing that appears to bother FF is that he seems to find the OP's claim of having emailed the Essex fire brigade so incredible that he confidently calls it a lie.



I have absolutely no idea what FF finds even slightly unlikely about it.
 

Back
Top Bottom