• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

A spanner in the AE 911 Truth works

All the required information to verify the original claim is in the OP. A screenshot or forwarded email in itself is not verification. Otherwise I have several billion dollars waiting in my inbox.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
People like me? What does that mean?

Do you think that is my real email? Come on. Yes, it's a real email, but it's an anonymous address. I can throw it away at any time. You can do the same thing.

BTW, the inbox is still empty. The OP can't hide behind the "I don't know how to post a screenshot" excuse. Anyone can forward an email.

How does it feel to want?


Get used to it.
 
All the required information to verify the original claim is in the OP. A screenshot or forwarded email in itself is not verification. Otherwise I have several billion dollars waiting in my inbox.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

+1 and welcome!
 
Please take a screenshot of the original email and post it.

Thanks.
It's interesting the first thought to enter your mind is one of distrust and suspicion.
You make me wonder what might have happened in your life to make you this way. Care to tell us?
 
Do you really think any of us would willingly give away our email address to people like you?
Oh, I am. My real name is Pedro Gimeno Fortea (I've posted it in my profile too) and my current email address is in my homepage, http://www.formauri.es/personal/pgimeno/

I just don't have the data that DGM offered, but even if I did, I wouldn't trust FalseFlag. He seems to have zero respect for privacy. He seems to think that publishing private correspondence is just fine, as long as certain identity details are redacted. I'm certainly not OK with that.
 
Oh, I am. My real name is Pedro Gimeno Fortea (I've posted it in my profile too) and my current email address is in my homepage, http://www.formauri.es/personal/pgimeno/

I just don't have the data that DGM offered, but even if I did, I wouldn't trust FalseFlag. He seems to have zero respect for privacy. He seems to think that publishing private correspondence is just fine, as long as certain identity details are redacted. I'm certainly not OK with that.

I'd remind everyone considering giving their email address to False Flag that this is the guy who wished all our relatives would die in the next terrorist attack. With fanatacism and sociopathy like that, "Truthers" (was there ever a more ridiculous moniker?) are the last people to whom I would give away my private details.
 
Post it here. Just redact what you feel you need to. Share it with everyone.

Does this work for you?

On Thursday, April 28, 2016 10:40 AM, "infocentral@aia.org" <infocentral@aia.org> wrote:

XXXXXXXXXXX:
Thank you for contacting us. Our response to your inquiry is below.

If we can be of further assistance, please reply to this e-mail.


If you do not require any further assistance with this request, please take a minute to complete a short survey. Let us know how we are doing and how we can provide you with greater service in the future.

To access the survey click


Benjamin Haley
Dear Mr. XXXXX,
Thank you for contacting the American Institute of Architects.

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We have shared it with the appropriate parties.
Should you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us at 1-800-242-3837, option 2. Or, simply reply to this email and we will respond as quickly as possible.
Best Wishes,
AIA Information Central

The following Customer(s) have been CC'ed:
Ticket Information:
Ticket #: 5310-10478941
Date Created: 4/09/2016 01:42 PM EDT


If you have general questions, please direct them to infocentral@aia.org.

Powered by Parature
 
People looking for truth are your enemy?

Thanks for admitting this.

No, but scam artists of any type should be a listed public enemy.

Gage et al are at best delusional, and in certain respects are certainly working an angle for profit.

"Truth" has nothing to do with it.
 
Yes.

It does not show that AIA was not happy with AE911T. It only shows that they replied to an email.
Did you email the AIA with the ticket #? Obviously you haven't because they wouldn't have replied by now. Do it!

Better yet, contact Gage* and mention my handle.........

*Contacting Kelly David would be the best bet.
 
Last edited:
I don't think it is laziness. It must have been far, far more effort for FalseFlag to keep posting in this threads then to send a simple email to Essex.

But then, FalseFlag has posted that he doesn't care about the meeting itself. So finding out if the email was factually authentic or not is, by his own post, not of interest to him. For all I know he may even have emailed and received an answer by now. How would I know?

It appears to be like the thread on the 911 NYC fire department: what the actual transcripts or emails say is not important for him. Instead the focus of his posts in these threads is the accusation of nefarious intent.
 
Last edited:
All I wanted was for the OP to post the email. Why? It's because what he posted makes no sense.

Has the original email been posted? No.

All of the extra discussion has been for nothing. I just wanted to see the original email. That has not happened.
 

Back
Top Bottom