If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

FalseFlag said:
When did this happen? When did a 110 story building land on a 47 story building? This is amazing! How come I never heard of this? Do you have pictures? Do you have news articles? I mean, it seems like this would make the news.

Please, tell me more about this 110 story building landing on a 47 story building.
Click to expand...
The pictures are all over the place.
 
The sun will burn itself out before truthers manage to get a new investigation. It will never happen. Truthers can't even organise some testing on a couple of specks of paint. None of them is serious at all. I've had bigger bowel movements than the truth movement. In essence there isn't one, it's just the same gullible and paranoid people who believe conspiracy theories. The only thing that's changed is the advent of the internet.
 
Myriad said:
You might be serious about wanting a new investigation. Maybe.

Getting one? You're not doing anything that even remotely resembles taking the slightest step toward getting a new investigation. Neither is anyone else active in 9/11 truth at present.
Click to expand...

The leaders of the movement have no initiative to actually investigate anything what would be the reason they would want their frauds exposed?
 
FalseFlag said:
Please post one.

Also, please post links to a credible article or report that states a 110 story building fell on a 47 story building.
Click to expand...

I've posted them myself in response to this same line of questioning from you some time ago.

I suggest you use the search function. If I respond here, there is nothing stopping you - actually, it's quite likely - that you will request them again in a few days or weeks. Such is the nature of the dishonesty of the truth movement.
 
FalseFlag said:
When did this happen? When did a 110 story building land on a 47 story building? This is amazing! How come I never heard of this? Do you have pictures? Do you have news articles? I mean, it seems like this would make the news.

Please, tell me more about this 110 story building landing on a 47 story building.
Click to expand...

How odd that you take issue with hyperbole in this instance and yet when Criteria states that fire caused the simultaneous failure of all columns in WTC7 , You fall silent.
 
FalseFlag said:
I'm very serious about getting a new investigation. The fact that I will no longer answer questions here has nothing to do that.
Click to expand...

You're serious about getting a new investigation, but you can't tell us...

- Who is qualified to do the investigation,
- How they should go about it considering that 15 years after the fact there is little but photos and original reports to go on,
- What theories should be included in this investigation and on what basis they should be included or excluded,
- Whether you would accept the findings of such an investigation if it returned an outcome you don't currently agree with,
- And who would fund it, given that receiving Governmental funding would taint any results automatically.

Seems to me if you can't even answer these basic questions about your wanted new investigation, then you're not serious at all because you haven't even started basic planning on what sort of new investigation you want, and that isn't serious at all.
 
PhantomWolf said:
You're serious about getting a new investigation, but you can't tell us...

- Who is qualified to do the investigation,
- How they should go about it considering that 15 years after the fact there is little but photos and original reports to go on,
- What theories should be included in this investigation and on what basis they should be included or excluded,
- Whether you would accept the findings of such an investigation if it returned an outcome you don't currently agree with,
- And who would fund it, given that receiving Governmental funding would taint any results automatically.

Seems to me if you can't even answer these basic questions about your wanted new investigation, then you're not serious at all because you haven't even started basic planning on what sort of new investigation you want, and that isn't serious at all.
Click to expand...

These issues need to be addressed by experts. I am not an expert.
 
FalseFlag said:
These issues need to be addressed by experts. I am not an expert.
Click to expand...

How do you know who the experts are? What qualifies them to be experts?

You don't need an expert to answer what you think the answers should be, after all if the new investigation was a janitor, a guy that designs dollhouses, a dentist, and botanist, would they be good enough? They are all experts in their fields so why not?

The fact you're copping out shows you aren't serious at all. If you were serious then you wouldn't be leaving it up to other people.
 
FalseFlag said:
These issues need to be addressed by experts. I am not an expert.
Click to expand...
This is never going to happen because there are no experts actually considering these questions. They would not do this until after there was shown to be a need for a new investigation.

Let us know when the need arrives.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom