Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
sunmaster14 said:
One of these is not like the others. Actually, two of them.
Click to expand...

Okay, I'll bite. Two of them are dead. And two are women. And Sanders wasn't actually a Democrat, although he consistently voted with them. But what's the shot at Obama, if that's the two you mean?
 
Bob001 said:
Okay, I'll bite. Two of them are dead. And two are women. And Sanders wasn't actually a Democrat, although he consistently voted with them. But what's the shot at Obama, if that's the two you mean?
Click to expand...

"shot'?:confused:

The Illinois State Senate did not have a vote on the Iraq war Authorization
 
16.5 said:
"shot'?:confused:

The Illinois State Senate did not have a vote on the Iraq war Authorization
Click to expand...

Whoops! True enough. But he was speaking against it at anti-war rallies when many politicians (Hillary?) felt compelled to demonstrate their patriotism, so that probably counts for something. (By "shot," i just meant linking Sanders and Obama, which both might have some reservations about.)
 
TheL8Elvis said:
I'm sorry, your going to need to explain how some random twitter screenshot is evidence "of a Hillary fanatic bragging about reporting a Pro-Bernie site...."

Because in the real world, it's not evidence of anything.

Let's start with ... where did that screen shot come from ?
Click to expand...

4 more posts claiming "shillary" but not one post answering this question or providing evidence.

This is my shocked face. :rolleyes:
 
Bob001 said:
Whoops! True enough. But he was speaking against it at anti-war rallies when many politicians (Hillary?) felt compelled to demonstrate their patriotism, so that probably counts for something. (By "shot," i just meant linking Sanders and Obama, which both might have some reservations about.)
Click to expand...

yep, he did, which is a point that he and his supporters made quite clearly and effectively in 2008.

And nothing has changed
 
Bob001 said:
Okay, I'll bite. Two of them are dead. And two are women. And Sanders wasn't actually a Democrat, although he consistently voted with them. But what's the shot at Obama, if that's the two you mean?
Click to expand...

Neither Sanders nor Obama were in the Senate during the Iraq war vote. Your "42%" allusion was clearly to the 42% of Democratic senators who voted against the resolution.
 
16.5 said:
More confirmation that a pro-clinton troll was behind last nights take down of bernie sanders sites

http://usuncut.com/politics/bernie-facebook-groups-trolled/
Click to expand...

In your world , one facebook post = a targeted attack by Hillary Clinton supporters.

ANd, "it’s still unclear if these gutter tactics are tied to Correct the Record, the pro-Hillary Clinton Super PAC that openly declared last week that it would launch a sophisticated social media campaign aimed at Bernie Sanders supporters. "

:thumbsup:
 
TheL8Elvis said:
In your world , one facebook post = a targeted attack by Hillary Clinton supporters.

ANd, "it’s still unclear if these gutter tactics are tied to Correct the Record, the pro-Hillary Clinton Super PAC that openly declared last week that it would launch a sophistic
ated social media campaign aimed at Bernie Sanders supporters. "

:thumbsup:
Click to expand...

However, some of Casey Champagne’s recent likes are Correct the Record, Barrier Breakers, and an anti-Sanders page called “Pragmatic Progressives.”
Click to expand...

The quote above is interesting, though. It was mistakenly left out of the quote. Not exactly damning evidence, but it's evidence.

Casey looks too stupid to do something like this on his own, but that is admittedly not evidence.

Another pathetic aspect of this is all the comments in that article. How people think that what he did is noble. He even says "I'm proud of myself" to his adoring fans.

He lied on Facebook and silenced political opposition for a few minutes. Dude, you're a loser.
 
CTR is now the HAARP of politics. If a bird crapped on Bernie at a speech it would somehow be because of CTR.
 
mgidm86 said:
The quote above is interesting, though. It was mistakenly left out of the quote. Not exactly damning evidence, but it's evidence.

Casey looks too stupid to do something like this on his own, but that is admittedly not evidence.

Another pathetic aspect of this is all the comments in that article. How people think that what he did is noble. He even says "I'm proud of myself" to his adoring fans.

He lied on Facebook and silenced political opposition for a few minutes. Dude, you're a loser.
Click to expand...

We can agree he is an asshat, and anyone who does that stuff is also an asshat.

But to blame it all on some organized pro-hillary, anti-bernie movement with no evidence ... it's just absurd and it sour grapes from the bernie "fans"looking for someone or something to blame their loss on.

Or, in some cases here, it's just trolling.
 
Hillary bravely announces that half her cabinet would be made up of women:

“Well, I am going to have a Cabinet that looks like America, and 50 percent of America is women,” Clinton said during an MSNBC town hall.
Click to expand...

I was going to ask if they would have binders full of women, but as it turns out they've got an even better gag:

“We’ll start with a broad list and then begin to narrow it. But there is no question that there will be women on that list,” Podesta added, though he didn't provide any potential names.
Click to expand...

I would hope there would be women on the "broad" list.
 
Am I the only one who has not fallen for the CTR must be evil? How is it evil to have a social media response team?

Seems like a necessary tool in today's world.
 
The_Animus said:
How would you propose anyone prove such a thing?

Regardless of if they were paid or not it's pretty pathetic.
Click to expand...

Recorded conversation or email between the org and members.

First, it would help to establish who was working for ctr through a paycheck or something.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Am I the only one who has not fallen for the CTR must be evil? How is it evil to have a social media response team?

Seems like a necessary tool in today's world.
Click to expand...


I wouldn't call it "evil", but it certainly is unseemly. Paying an army of shills to swamp Twitter and Facebook with Hillary's propaganda; yep, that's unseemly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom