Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
PhantomWolf said:
You think that there is likely to be less war when one of Trump's policies is to use the Military to threaten China to make them do what he wants?
Click to expand...

That is one of the amusing things about Trump "Foreign Policy": one minute he sounds like a isolationist;the next he wants to bomb anybody who upsets him.

But don't try to tell his fanboys that.............
 
Anyway, Isolationism has worked so well in the past...........


I understand being disgusted with both political parties;but cheering any stray "anti establishment" idiot who comes along is pretty stupid.
 
dudalb said:
Anyway, Isolationism has worked so well in the past...........


I understand being disgusted with both political parties;but cheering any stray "anti establishment" idiot who comes along is pretty stupid.
Click to expand...

It essentially seems like some people have concluded that because the system isn't working properly the solution is to smash it to pieces in the hopes it will work better.
 
Garrison said:
It essentially seems like some people have concluded that because the system isn't working properly the solution is to smash it to pieces in the hopes it will work better.
Click to expand...

AKA as "Burning down the house to get rid of a couple of mice".
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Bernie Sanders’ Team Just Accused Hillary Clinton of Violating Campaign Finance Rules (April 18, 2016)
<snip>
Click to expand...
The stench of desperation is becoming thicker.

Slings and Arrows said:
Ouch: Social critic calls Clinton ‘utterly corrupt,’ ‘incompetent,’ ‘soulless’ (April 18, 2016)
https://personalliberty.com/ouch-influential-dem-calls-clinton-utterly-corrupt-incompetent-soulless/
Click to expand...
:rolleyes: "Personalliberty.com". Now I wonder what that is.
Oh yes, it's the website of Bob Livingston, racist, ultra-conservative, "Patriot", anti-vaxxer, and far-right conspiracy nut.
 
More shady crap and more money for the shillaries: Hillary PAC Spends $1 Million to ‘Correct’ Commenters on Reddit and Facebook

Ben Collins said:
Citing “lessons learned from online engagement with ‘Bernie Bros,’” a pro-Hillary Clinton Super PAC is pledging to spend $1 million to “push back against” users on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit and Instagram.

Correct the Record’s “Barrier Breakers” project boasts in a press release that it has already “addressed more than 5,000 people that have personally attacked Hillary Clinton on Twitter.” [...]

“This explains why my inbox turned to cancer on Tuesday,” wrote user OKarizee. “Been a member of reddit for almost 4 years and never experienced anything like it. In fact, in all my years on the internet I’ve never experienced anything like it.”

Correct the Record, which has received $5 million this campaign season and has spent almost $4.5 million of it, according to OpenSecrets.org, outlined its strategy against “swarms of anonymous attackers” in a press release.

“While Hillary Clinton fights to break down barriers and bring America together, the Barrier Breakers 2016 digital task force will serve as a resource for supporters looking for positive content and push-back to share with their online progressive communities, as well as thanking prominent supporters and committed superdelegates on social media,” the statement read.

Due to FEC loopholes, the Sunlight Foundation’s Libby Watson found this year that Correct the Record can openly coordinate with Clinton’s campaign, despite rules that typically disallow political campaigns from working directly with PACs. [...]
Click to expand...
 
Childlike Empress said:
More shady crap and more money for the shillaries: Hillary PAC Spends $1 Million to ‘Correct’ Commenters on Reddit and Facebook
Click to expand...

Hey, it's good enough for the CIA, Uncle Vladimir, et al.

I know it's being done by someone you dislike, but face it, this is probably the smartest expenditure of campaign funds. The Ronulans went unchallenged and had a field day, then the poor babies had a nervous breakdown when the GOP convention didn't rise up in arms to match Paul's web presence. Unchallenged, people can claim anything. If an army, be it all volunteer or conscripted is out there smearing and slandering your candidate, get some bucks out of the vault and counter their arguments.

I have no problem with it. Seems like a wise expenditure. What are we supposed to object to? That Hillary is spending money? It's not like Bernie is investing those hundreds of mil in US Treasure Bonds.
 
What Sort of Foreign-Policy Hawk Is Hillary Clinton?
Hillary Clinton is more hawkish on foreign policy than President Obama. But what sort of hawk is she?...

Clinton is more comfortable using American military power than Obama, and that she shares little of his skepticism of the military and foreign-policy establishments....

Under the tutelage of uniformed officers like Hagenbeck and Keane, whom she also got to know in 2001, Clinton turned herself into an expert on military matters.... she valued the generals’ knowledge, and their combat experience. “She likes the nail-eaters—McChrystal, Petraeus, Keane,”...

“Hillary is very much a member of the traditional American foreign-policy establishment. She believes... in asserting American influence.”
Click to expand...
 
Childlike Empress said:
I couldn't care less. It's important to know that "shillaries" isn't just a cute word.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I saw that article yesterday, thank you for posting it. I wonder if anybody here is a paid Shillary? After reading some of the arguments here I can only say I hope so ;)
 
16.5 said:
Hillary release the Goldman Sachs transcripts yet, lol.
Click to expand...


Hillary Clinton has attempted to justify her high-dollar remarks to Wall Street firms by claiming she didn't know she'd be running for president when she delivered them, and that she merely accepted "what they offered" in terms of compensation.

Fact Check:

Hillary's standard fee ($225,000) and her demands are outlined in a memo from the Harry Walker Agency in New York. According to the memo:

Mrs. Clinton requires roundtrip travel by private jet, and prefers a Gulfstream 450 or larger. Her staff requires first class and business class tickets. And two members of her staff require up to three days on site to prepare, with all local transportation and meals included.

Mrs. Clinton should be booked into a presidential suite with up to three separate rooms attached.

Mrs. Clinton also requires a flat fee of $1,000 to pay for an onsite stenographer to record everything she says. However, she is not required to provide the host with a copy.

Costs associated with the above demands are on top of the $225,000 speaking fee.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Slings and Arrows said:
Hillary Clinton has attempted to justify her high-dollar remarks to Wall Street firms by claiming she didn't know she'd be running for president when she delivered them, and that she merely accepted "what they offered" in terms of compensation.

Fact Check:

Hillary's standard fee ($225,000) and her demands are outlined in a memo from the Harry Walker Agency in New York. According to the memo:
Click to expand...

Mrs. Clinton also requires a flat fee of $1,000 to pay for an onsite stenographer to record everything she says. However, she is not required to provide the host with a copy.

Huh, seems like she already got paid for the transcript.

Wonder why she won't release it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom