If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

NoahFence said:
They murdered thousands of people. I'm not sure i care.
Click to expand...

What about the attacks on people who ware cloth on their heads who were non Muslims?

Put the blame where it belongs, not one of the terrorists on 9/11/2001 had a turbin on his head and many who do wear them are non Muslims.
 
NoahFence said:
You don't understand anything regarding the events of 9/11 that are rooted in reality.
Click to expand...

FalseFlag said:
Please give one example.
Click to expand...
That terrorism masterminded by Osama bin Laden conspired with others to attack Americans on American soil. They accomplished their goal on 9/11/2001. That reality is what you choose to remain ignorant of.

Still awaiting for an answer to the question I've asked 4 times as of now. It is: Why do you choose to believe 9/11 was an inside job and not an act carried out by terrorists?
 
Last edited:
NoahFence said:
Not to mention, your explosives would have to be able to survive this:
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=1270&pictureid=10679[/qimg]
Not possible. Period. Get a new hobby, junior.
Click to expand...

Really? Please explain how explosives above and below the impact zone would be affected.
 
tfk said:
Meanwhile, about 200 world class structural engineering experts studied the exact same evidence available to you for six full years, and with their roughly 6,000 years (200 x 30 years average each) cumulative years of training & experience, came to the opposite conclusion.

And those guys documented every assumption, every analytical method & every conclusion. And submitted it to several layers of peer review.

And their work has been replicated, piecemeal, by other trained experts, and found to hold up to scrutiny.
And their work has been accepted by the engineering community at large.
Click to expand...

Really? Who are the 200 experts?

Please show me how the "engineering community at large" has accepted the conclusions of the 200 experts you speak of.

Also, please explain how the engineering community at large could possibly accept NIST's statement, "We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse."

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/NISTresponseToRequestForCorrectionGourleyEtal2.pdf
Page 4. End of first paragraph.
 
FalseFlag said:
Really? Please explain how explosives above and below the impact zone would be affected.
Click to expand...

Wait.....what?

You accept that there was a plane impact, but you are postulating that there were explosives involved as well? Why bother, when flying a plane into a building is plenty enough to get you headlines the following day?
 
FalseFlag said:
Really? Please explain how explosives above and below the impact zone would be affected.
Click to expand...

FalseFlag said:
Really? Who are the 200 experts?

Please show me how the "engineering community at large" has accepted the conclusions of the 200 experts you speak of.

Also, please explain how the engineering community at large could possibly accept NIST's statement, "We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse."

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/NISTresponseToRequestForCorrectionGourleyEtal2.pdf
Page 4. End of first paragraph.
Click to expand...

Is there any amount of work you are willing to do in order to educate yourself?

Did you do any research to confirm Cole's experiment?

Of course not. The experiment agreed with your preconceived notion and you ran with it. You are a credulous, ignorant person.
 
MikeG said:
Wait.....what?

You accept that there was a plane impact, but you are postulating that there were explosives involved as well? Why bother, when flying a plane into a building is plenty enough to get you headlines the following day?
Click to expand...
Were the 9/11 planners trying to make headlines or destroy buildings, or both?
 
Last edited:
Argumemnon said:
Is there any amount of work you are willing to do in order to educate yourself?

Did you do any research to confirm Cole's experiment?

Of course not. The experiment agreed with your preconceived notion and you ran with it. You are a credulous, ignorant person.
Click to expand...
Translation: OMG, why won't FalseFlag just go away? Let's keep attacking him and hope it will make him go away.

Just so you know, I'm not going away, so stop attacking.
 
NoahFence said:
Irrelevant. The collapse started in the impact zone (imagine that!)

No explosives above or below. Unless you're about to vomit out some retarded explanation to the contrary?
Click to expand...
So, you ignore my question by just claiming that explosives didn't exist.
Nice trick, but still lame.
 
FalseFlag said:
So, you ignore my question by just claiming that explosives didn't exist.
Nice trick, but still lame.
Click to expand...

Well if they were there, they sure as hell didn't go off.

What is it with you people and your fascination with mocking the deaths of thousands of people? Seems a bit dickish if you ask me.
 
NoahFence said:
Well if they were there, they sure as hell didn't go off.

What is it with you people and your fascination with mocking the deaths of thousands of people? Seems a bit dickish if you ask me.
Click to expand...
It's a shame that no one heard them go off, no one saw them go off, and no one experienced the forces of them going off.

It's also a shame that I can't go online and listen to these people make these claims.

Oh, wait, I can. So, wait. I can listen to the people who were there, or I can sit in front of a computer and call them liars and claim they are wrong. Hmmmm. To an average person, whose actions are, in your words, more "dickish"?
 
Last edited:
FalseFlag said:
It's a shame that no one heard them go off, no one saw them go off, and no one experienced the forces of them going off.
Click to expand...

Finally you say something accurate.
Baby steps, kiddo. Baby steps.

It's also a shame that I can't go online and listen to these people make these claims.

Oh, wait, I can. So, wait. I can listen to the people who were there, or I can sit in front of a computer and call them liars and claim they are wrong. Hmmmm. To an average person, whose actions are, in your words, more "dickish"?
Click to expand...

Reports of explosions do not equal presence of explosives. I know you've been told this and shown this probably a hundred times by now. At what point is it going to sink in?
 
Last edited:
FalseFlag said:
Never. Your nonsense will never sink in because I don't suffer from any cognitive impairments.
Click to expand...

Oh yes you do.

You're under the impression explosives can survive the impact and fire for roughly an hour.

I'd like to see you do an experiment that can confirm that. Get to it.

FF -
has there ever, in the history of humanity, been an explosion that you're aware of that wasn't the result of an explosive device?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom