If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

[jaydeehess]

Ask Cole. Actually, watch the video, because some of the answers are clearly in the video. If you are trying to make the scale argument again, please don't waste your time.

true, trying to show, demonstrate, illustrate and explain to you that scaling issues make all the difference in the world, is a waste of time since you simply cannot or will not grasp the concept and its truth.

 

[FalseFlag]

Most of the 'nonsense' that goes on here is contained within your posts, from what I can see.

Open your eyes more, and your mind, and that will change.

 

[ProBonoShill]

2501 architects, scientists, and engineers say you are wrong.

www.ae911truth.org

99.995% of the planet's architects, scientists, and engineers say we're right.

 

[FalseFlag]

you're vouching here for the validity of his experiment

I'm not an expert. I can not vouch for an expert. I am only saying I think he is right.

Why can't you get the simplest facts straight?

 

[DGM]

You should be.

Go here to sign the petition: www.ae911truth.org.

Why sign a petition that will never be presented to anyone? It's a sales tool, nothing more. It's been almost 10 years, do you think any of the signature would be considered valid?

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Ask Cole. Actually, watch the video, because some of the answers are clearly in the video. If you are trying to make the scale argument again, please don't waste your time.

Yes the answer is a glorified plumber shouldn't do physics, and probably not plumbing either.

 

[jaydeehess]

I'm not an expert. I can not vouch for an expert. I am only saying I think he is right.

Why can't you get the simplest facts straight?

oh its quite simple then. You "think" wrong.

 

[FalseFlag]

No detcord, no detonators, nothing that could be used to protect the explosives from the aircraft impacts and fire. No evidence of work being done on the beams. Nothing.

The fantasy that explosives were used on 9/11 is truly one of the most absurd, moronic ideas any human being has ever come up with.

It sounds like you desperately want a new investigation. I have already posted links that show you where you can help everyone get the answers they are looking for.

 

[FalseFlag]

As a public figure exposing his work for all to examine and review, Mr. Cole has far more credibility at the starting gate that some anonymous clown claiming expertise from A to Z in a forum that permits lying.

Thanks for that. It's a good point. No one else will say it, so I will.

 

[ProBonoShill]

No, I don't. The investigators performing the new investigation would need to do this.

Why are you failing to get your new investigation? Why can't you get one?

Nobody's stopping you... let's get a move on.

 

[Andy_Ross]

I'm not saying it, the NFPA is.

What is the NFPA, you ask?




And what does the NFPA say is the correct thing to do in events where extremism is involved?




NIST didn't follow their own standards.

Let me be clear. The only reason I don't take the time to destroy each of your arguments with such precision is because I just don't have the time. Also, you make yourselves look quite foolish on your own. I just point it out for you.

There were thousands of witnesses to what happened, it was also all live on TV . There was a massive investigation by the FBI and others involving thousands of agents and investigators. No evidence of explosives was found.

 

[FalseFlag]

99.995% of the planet's architects, scientists, and engineers say we're right.

No, they don't.
Silence is not proof you are correct. Silence is nothing more than silence.

 

[Spanx]

Let me be clear. The only reason I don't take the time to destroy each of your arguments with such precision is because I just don't have the time. Also, you make yourselves look quite foolish on your own. I just point it out for you.

Crystal clear, I can see you don't have the time to do anything you claim.

 

[FalseFlag]

There were thousands of witnesses to what happened, it was also all live on TV . There was a massive investigation by the FBI and others involving thousands of agents and investigators. No evidence of explosives was found.

You post this nonsense right after I post information from a credible source explaining why they should have investigated for explosives.

Are you doing this intentionally, or do you lack the ability to see what you're doing?

 

[Porkpie Hat]

2501 architects, scientists, and engineers say you are wrong.

www.ae911truth.org

No. 2501 architects, scientists, and engineers do not say explosives were used or that evidence for them exists (it just doesn't regardless of how you try to twist it).

Sorry FF, almost no one falls for that kind of childish ploy anymore.

 

[FalseFlag]

No. 2501 architects, scientists, and engineers do not say explosives were used or that evidence for them exists (it just doesn't regardless of how you try to twist it).

Sorry FF, almost no one falls for that kind of childish ploy anymore.

Please prove your claim.

 

[beachnut]

What steel did you personally examine?

I guess you must have missed this piece - https://youtu.be/VvQDFV1HINw?t=50

Failure personified - 9/11 truth followers.

The steel was corroded in fire.
https://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf

The steel was studied, and Cole ignores reality.
Cole's videos are all BS.

2501 architects, scientists, and engineers say you are wrong.

www.ae911truth.org

Less than 0.1 percent of all engineers are in AE911T; fringe of the fringe. And not one has evidence for anything you have claimed.

 

[HSienzant]

I'm ready, willing, and able to accept the facts, but you haven't posted any yet.

Your posts provided substantial proof that the exact opposite is true.

Which part? The post you're responding to makes two points - one about me and one about your posts.

And I have proven it.

Assertions are not proof.

Cole's experiments are attempts to replicated the observed motions during the collapses of the twin towers.

You need to raise the bar a bit and prove they are valid attempts to replicate the motions observed during the collapses of the twin towers. Prove that.

The twin towers collapsed on 9/11.

No kidding. Congratulations, you got two things right today.

Experiments attempting to replicate the observed motions of the collapse are relevant.

You haven't shown that Cole's experiment replicates the observed motions of the collapse or that they are designed well enough to have any meaning in that regard.

You asked for proof. I have provided it - again.

You've provided some assertions.

You will refuse to accept it, again. Your refusal to accept proof is, in itself, that you refuse to accept facts. You are in denial. That is also a fact you refuse to accept.

All I did was ask for your proof. None of what you say about me is accurate. You deflect from providing said proof by asserting you already provided it, but as I pointed out previously, from your very first post in this thread you've been shifting the burden of proof and asking others to disprove Cole's experiment.

Hank

 

[Spanx]

What?
Oh, the thrashing and the constant acceleration issues. At this point, I'm just debating if it's worth it. I'm pretty sure it's not, but I feel I should embarrass you all more just for the lulz.

Yep, you haven't got time.

 

[Andy_Ross]

You post this nonsense right after I post information from a credible source explaining why they should have investigated for explosives.

Are you doing this intentionally, or do you lack the ability to see what you're doing?

There was an investigation. It was the biggest undertaken by the FBI. It involved other relevant agencies. Thousands of people examined the rubble in fingertip detail.
Steel beams were identified and examined.
No one saw any evidence of explosives. No explosive damage to the steel. No remains of det chord, detonators, caps etc. Absolutely nothing.