I have proven that I understand basic physics to the satisfaction of the physics "experts" on this forum.
No, you've proven precisely the reverse. You've clung to your misconceptions in the face of overwhelming proof to the contrary, insulted and threatened everyone who's tried to educate you, eventually conceded that your understanding of two very basic pieces of physics was completely wrong, and claimed sole credit for correcting your own misconceptions. At present, all that you've proved is that you are capable, after sufficient use of blunt instruments, of accepting that
two specific findings of physics are correct as described by almost everyone else (except Criteria, of course) in the thread. You continue to demonstrate that you are incapable of generalizing these findings to a better understanding of Cole's errors by continuing to pretend these don't exist. What you've proven is that you're ignorant, incompetent, resistant to acquiring knowledge, and almost incapable of changing an opinion once you've formed it.
But there's no need to argue any further, really. You've insisted that a new investigation is necessary; the majority disagrees with you, but why let that stop you? You could simply join a group of like-minded individuals and carry out the investigation yourselves, maybe by raising funds and commissioning some expert to do an independent study. What could go wrong with that, right?
Or you could waste your own time whining to people who understand all this far better than you and are laughing to themselves at your ignorance and stupidity, and pretend that you can somehow tell enough blatant lies, play enough word games and throw around enough insults to convince them that all they know is in doubt. Why on Earth you would choose such a pointless course of action is beyond me, but in what universe do you expect it to get the new investigation that you claim you want?
Dave
