RE: clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Following up on back to back historic rulings in Judicial Watch cases from two different Judges ordering discovery into State's abysmal FOIA practices under the helm of Hillary Clinton, the State Department desperately tries to stave off basic discovery.

Top aides to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton should not be questioned about an ongoing FBI investigation into the presence of classified information on her private email server or about the substance of the messages that were exchanged, as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, the State Department said in a court filing Tuesday night.
Click to expand...

Listen, I get that the aides are terrified of answering questions, particularly where the FBI investigation is hanging over their heads and the head of Hillary, but the American people have the right to know!

Godspeed Judicial Watch!
 
16.5 said:
Following up on back to back historic rulings in Judicial Watch cases from two different Judges ordering discovery into State's abysmal FOIA practices under the helm of Hillary Clinton, the State Department desperately tries to stave off basic discovery.



Listen, I get that the aides are terrified of answering questions, particularly where the FBI investigation is hanging over their heads and the head of Hillary, but the American people have the right to know!

Godspeed Judicial Watch!
Click to expand...

Wait, does this have anything to do with Hillary? It doesn't look like she said, implied, or even commented on anything. She's not heading the State Department, which appears to have made the statement.

Oh, snap, I forgot. Anything that can possibly be viewed as negative is automatically tied to Hillary in some weird way.
 
16.5 said:
Following up on back to back historic rulings in Judicial Watch cases from two different Judges ordering discovery into State's abysmal FOIA practices under the helm of Hillary Clinton, the State Department desperately tries to stave off basic discovery.
Click to expand...

plague311 said:
Wait, does this have anything to do with Hillary? It doesn't look like she said, implied, or even commented on anything. She's not heading the State Department, which appears to have made the statement.

Oh, snap, I forgot. Anything that can possibly be viewed as negative is automatically tied to Hillary in some weird way.
Click to expand...

:eye-poppi

One should familiarize oneself with the basic facts posted in this thread before posting.... smh
 
16.5 said:
:eye-poppi

One should familiarize oneself with the basic facts posted in this thread before posting.... smh
Click to expand...

Thanks for that complete and utter waste of time. That's really helpful. I read it, I saw it, but your quote said:

the State Department said in a court filing Tuesday night.
Click to expand...

I get that it was during Hillary's watch, but Hillary didn't say anything about this. The information wasn't coming from Hillary, it was coming from the current State department, is it not? You seem to trying to cast some shadow on Hillary during this, as if she's the one saying they shouldn't answer.
 
16.5 said:
Following up on back to back historic rulings in Judicial Watch cases from two different Judges ordering discovery into State's abysmal FOIA practices under the helm of Hillary Clinton, the State Department desperately tries to stave off basic discovery.
Top aides to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton should not be questioned about an ongoing FBI investigation into the presence of classified information on her private email server or about the substance of the messages that were exchanged, as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, the State Department said in a court filing Tuesday night.
Click to expand...

Listen, I get that the aides are terrified of answering questions, particularly where the FBI investigation is hanging over their heads and the head of Hillary, but the American people have the right to know!

Godspeed Judicial Watch!
Click to expand...

plague311 said:
Wait, does this have anything to do with Hillary? It doesn't look like she said, implied, or even commented on anything. She's not heading the State Department, which appears to have made the statement.

Oh, snap, I forgot. Anything that can possibly be viewed as negative is automatically tied to Hillary in some weird way.
Click to expand...

Does "ordering discovery into State's abysmal FOIA practices under the helm of Hillary Clinton" have anything to do with Hillary.... :eye-poppi

"Anything that can possibly be viewed as negative is automatically tied to Hillary in some weird way" was written about the scope of her aides deposition about the use of her server :eek:

plague311 said:
Thanks for that complete and utter waste of time.
Click to expand...

your posts were indeed a waste of time.
 
A vast E-Mail Conspiracy

A Vast Email Conspiracy
Hillary’s biggest problem isn’t Bernie. It’s the Freedom of Information Act.

State left it to Mrs. Clinton and her aides to possess them, and then to unilaterally decide what to hand over. To Judge Royce Lamberth, this is cut and dry “evidence of government wrong-doing and bad faith,” and the law demands a full accounting of how this situation came to be, what records exist, and where they are now.
Click to expand...

Said another Judge:

Judge Emmet Sullivan, the first to allow discovery, referred in his own hearing to Mrs. Clinton’s “totally atypical system” and noted that it “boggles the mind that the State Department allowed this circumstance to arise in the first place. It’s just very, very, very troubling.”
Click to expand...

http://www.wsj.com/articles/a-vast-email-conspiracy-1460069105

/if the link does not work, just cut and paste the headline into google news. You're skeptics, you can figure it out.
 
Newtons Bit said:
Huh. Guccifer just got extradited to the US. Totally unrelated, I'm sure.
Click to expand...

Interesting.

I am certain that the FBI is extremely interested in Guccifer's hack of Sid Blumenthal's emails, particularly in light of the fact that he was clearly being fed intelligence by ex-CIA Tyler Drumheller regarding Sudan’s government plan, in coordination with two rebel generals, to secure control of oil reserves which appears to be a NSA doc, and which Sid sent to Hillary through her cowboy server.

Remember Sid was on the Clinton's payroll when he was feeding her all this stuff.

Interesting development.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
From the WSJ article:

Given Gowdy admitted his partisan plot, I stopped reading right there.
Click to expand...

Given the amount of misinformation that you posted in this thread (e.g. that the FBI recovered docs and gave them to the State Department; that Gowdy "admitted" a "partisan" "plot") I have no trouble at all believing that you stopped reading right there
 
Trey Gowdy's partisan plot:
After Gowdy Caught In A Lie, He Runs To Politico To Whine
Rep Trey Gowdy admits he altered the documents that he used to make false claims against Hillary Clinton in a response to a letter from Rep Elijah Cummings....

“I would say in some ways these have been among the worst weeks of my life,” Gowdy said this weekend during a lengthy interview with POLITICO. “Attacks on your character, attacks on your motives, are 1,000-times worse than anything you can do to anybody physically — at least it is for me.”

Yeah, he should get some pointers from Hillary Clinton on that. She's been dealing with it for decades.
Click to expand...
CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source
WASHINGTON—Today, Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, the Ranking Member of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, sent a letter to Chairman Trey Gowdy to correct the public record after the CIA debunked Chairman Gowdy’s accusation that Secretary Clinton sent an email containing "some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.”
Click to expand...
House Benghazi chairman to Republicans: 'shut up' - Trey Gowdy tells GOP to zip it after members said the panel is politically motivated to go after Hillary Clinton

Even members of his own party noticed the trend. Just because he continues to pretend it wasn't true doesn't make it not blatantly obviously true.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Trey Gowdy's partisan plot:
After Gowdy Caught In A Lie, He Runs To Politico To Whine

CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source

House Benghazi chairman to Republicans: 'shut up' - Trey Gowdy tells GOP to zip it after members said the panel is politically motivated to go after Hillary Clinton

Even members of his own party noticed the trend. Just because he continues to pretend it wasn't true doesn't make it not blatantly obviously true.
Click to expand...

Wow! Armando from Daily Kos as quoted in "crooks and liars"! Scintillating!

Hillary's actual confirmed waterboy on the Committee, Elija Cummings?

Cripes is there any blatantly ridiculous propaganda you won't cite. By the way, that had to do with Cummings gross misrepresentation about "altering" a document, when in point of fact it had simply been "redacted". As such, does not support your frivolous claims.....

which are flat out contradicted by your third cite!:thumbsup::D:thumbsup: in which Gowdy told Republicans to "shut up"!

FANTASTIC!!!!!
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Trey Gowdy's partisan plot:
After Gowdy Caught In A Lie, He Runs To Politico To Whine

CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source

House Benghazi chairman to Republicans: 'shut up' - Trey Gowdy tells GOP to zip it after members said the panel is politically motivated to go after Hillary Clinton

Even members of his own party noticed the trend. Just because he continues to pretend it wasn't true doesn't make it not blatantly obviously true.
Click to expand...

Putting aside the spin that your less than credible sources have applied to disputed issues, I'm still not seeing where Trey Gowdy has admitted to being part of a partisan plot. That was your claim, correct?
 
sunmaster14 said:
Putting aside the spin that your less than credible sources have applied to disputed issues, I'm still not seeing where Trey Gowdy has admitted to being part of a partisan plot. That was your claim, correct?
Click to expand...

In fact her third cite absolutely contradicts it!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom