A very interesting opinion piece from Forbes:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/charlestiefer/2016/04/01/the-state-department-halts-a-potentially-vindicating-review-of-hillary-clinton-emails/#51ca30403ed2
The State Department was involved in a Vindicating Review that would have proved 95% of the emails were from other people to Hillary, not vice-versa and that it was business as usual for the State Department.
Us dopey non-filthy-rich commoners need to understand that an unfortunate feature of our legal system is that criminal investigations remove a person's right to Vindicating Reviews in the Civil system.
One thing Forbes forgot to mention is that it's much worse. The non-vindicating civil suits are still allowed to press forward. The bias of the civil court judges could not be more apparent with two of them making statements about bad faith and all.
Here, she has been convicted of absolutely NOTHING and even judges who supposedly follow the law are making these kinds of statements and even requiring Hillary turn over emails regarding official State Department business!
Worse yet, these judges are actually requiring State Department officials to
answer questions. Not from the FBI, but from
citizens. They have to tell the truth under penalties for lying when Hillary has already told us everything we need to know!
We know she had no classified information go through that server, that she did it for convenience, to email Bill, with the permission of the State Department, all of which emails were saved in the State Department system. She has been not only helpful with this routine review, but every email connected in any way to her official duties has already been turned over.
But, as Forbes said, there are these systemic problems in our legal system that remove the right to vindication.
