Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
All of this is very amazing. I can't levitate, but I once was able to convince a moderator of the Randi Educational forum to post this amazing statement (in one of my telepathy tests):

I didn't know him personally.

No matter how many times this poster has told you it was sarcasm, you continue to post this. One can only conclude at this point that not even you tie your "tests" seriously. Grow up, get help, or both. But no matter what, stop pretending that anyone, anywhere, takes your claims seriously.
 
No matter how many times this poster has told you it was sarcasm, you continue to post this. One can only conclude at this point that not even you tie your "tests" seriously. Grow up, get help, or both. But no matter what, stop pretending that anyone, anywhere, takes your claims seriously.
I take my tests very seriously, and so do my psychiatrists and doctors (or, at least, I hope so). Giordano posted recently this:
... please note that I am not questioning the validity of your beliefs ... I really do not think that there is a reason to question your beliefs on this forum, and that perhaps is the point that I was trying to make. ...
Also note that LL may say all he wants to say, this does not erase the past, something that really took place.
 
I take my tests very seriously, and so do my psychiatrists and doctors (or, at least, I hope so). Giordano posted recently this:

Also note that LL may say all he wants to say, this does not erase the past, something that really took place.

Just to clarify for those who did not read my original post- I indeed did not and do not question that Michel H believes that he has ESP as he states on these threads. Whether his beliefs match reality or not I do not see worth addressing in his threads. I can't find my original post but I seem to remember that I made these points in my post, but these were replaced by …..'s in my quote as presented above.

Others here should view this as a caution. Michel H strongly believes in his ESP abilities and will interpret anything (ANYTHING) one posts as an affirmation of those abilities. Therefore, along with others, I do not think that posting anything (humous, critical, advisory, dispassionately objective, or even sympathetic in terms of his posted difficulties with hearing voices, bad thoughts, guilt feelings, and his prior interactions with medical profession) as helping him to obtain an objective view of his abilities. For this same reason I do not see any point in arguing with him. I honestly can only wish him well.
 
Last edited:
... I can't find my original post but I seem to remember that I made these points in my post, but these were replaced by …..'s in my quote as presented above.
...
Giordano, you may easily go to your original post by clicking the little arrow next to your name in post #2762 above (or in the post below). It was (post #2620):
Not about this thread in particular. But please note that I am not questioning the validity of your beliefs, only if the approaches some others have taken are likely to change them. I base my opinion on the history of this thread. I really do not think that there is a reason to question your beliefs on this forum, and that perhaps is the point that I was trying to make.

As I have said in the past, I only wish you good fortune and peace of mind!
 
As I have told you before, I prefer not to do this ...
No you haven't.


... (I still have the audio recordings, but, because of recording with a cheap, entry-level computer with a small microphone, they are much less impressive than the real-life thing).
How much less impressive? So much less that in fact nothing out of the ordinary will be heard on them?

Do you actually really have such recordings, Michel H?
 
I have a very similar situation. I can levitate and stay in the air for up to an hour ...
...
The same happens with my levitation. ...
All of this is very amazing.

Comfyslippers and fromdownunder cannot really levitate, they are making a joke.

I can't levitate, but I once was able to convince a moderator of the Randi Educational forum to post this amazing statement (in one of my telepathy tests):
I am seeing a 4 very clearly. It's almost as though I had written it myself.


I didn't know him personally.
Loss Leader was being sarcastic, as he confirmed to you on several occasions but which you continue to ignore.
 
Comfyslippers...



Slippers Love.

I forgive you because I've just discovered you are a UKer too.
For some reason I always thought you were from New Zealand!
Also, I don't see signatures thanks to Tapatalk, but I've just done some stalking and I like yours.

At ease.
 
As I have told you before, I prefer not to do this ...
No you haven't.
...(I still have the audio recordings, but, because of recording with a cheap, entry-level computer with a small microphone, they are much less impressive than the real-life thing).
How much less impressive? So much less that in fact nothing out of the ordinary will be heard on them?

Do you actually really have such recordings, Michel H?
I replied to you, about a month ago:
Yes, I have made a few audio recordings, although they are not very recent. Sharing them here is something I could do if you adopted a more honest attitude regarding the real meaning of the telepathy testimonies I have quoted, and if the participation in my tests was less skeletal and more substantial, with a more satisfactory open-mindedness.
I have three recordings, two from 2013 and one from 2014. They are "authentic" recordings of brief, abnormal and violent noises in my apartment (shock sounds, like when you hit an object with a hammer). However, I don't think it would be appropriate to share them here at this time, in view of your generally hostile and contemptuous attitudes with respect to my claims.
 
I replied to you, about a month ago:

I have three recordings, two from 2013 and one from 2014. They are "authentic" recordings of brief, abnormal and violent noises in my apartment (shock sounds, like when you hit an object with a hammer). However, I don't think it would be appropriate to share them here at this time, in view of your generally hostile and contemptuous attitudes with respect to my claims.


Well, you may perceive it as hostility and contempt, while in fact the attitudes are as would be expected in a forum that values scientific and critical thinking, neither of which you have shown a capacity for.

Now, I understand this perception is not your fault, of course--probably due to your brain chemistry warping your view of the world around you--but perhaps you can try to see things from our point of view for a bit, to try to understand the reception you've received here.
 
I replied to you, about a month ago:
...
Yes, that one I remember, however, you didn't state you would rather not share this claimed audio. You were confusing that issue with you issue about not wanting to state what your physical problem was which led to you being put in a psychiatric ward:
Another question for you, Michel H, what was the physical problem you went to a psychiatric hospital for?
I would imagine self harm

Though I still call bollocks
I don't think it would be appropriate for me to reveal this here.



...
I have three recordings, two from 2013 and one from 2014. They are "authentic" recordings of brief, abnormal and violent noises in my apartment (shock sounds, like when you hit an object with a hammer). However, I don't think it would be appropriate to share them here at this time, in view of your generally hostile and contemptuous attitudes with respect to my claims.
Your claims are not blindly accepted. This may cause you distress.
However, you claim to have something from the real world (recorded audio) which may demonstrate something from the experience you are posting about here.
Now, all we have is unsubstantiated claims with a low plausibility.

To demonstrate what the sounds you talk about sound like, simply share some audio as described here:
So, let's hear some of these 'violent and abnormal noises'.
 
...
Loss Leader was being sarcastic, as he confirmed to you on several occasions but which you continue to ignore.
It is perhaps useful to recall briefly here what Loss Leader really said:

In August 2013, responding to my second telepathy test on this forum (which was then the forum of the Randi Educational Foundation), he said:
I am seeing a 4 very clearly. It's almost as though I had written it myself.
He was then the only moderator who participated in my test, his answer (4) to my test "Which number did I write?" was correct (and this was verified by the use of a MD5 hash). This answer was the only one Loss Leader ever gave to one of my tests, therefore his "hit rate" in my tests so far is equal to 100%.
You say, Agatha, "he was being sarcastic", but I do not detect sarcasm in his brief and sober answer above (if this was sarcasm, it was lucky sarcasm because he gave the right answer to the test). By the way, Agatha, I wonder what you do to keep the electromagnetic waves generated by your brain inside your skull.
About 8 months later, however (in April 2014, during my fourth test), he posted this:
I can't believe I have to spell this out. I was kidding. I wasn't serious. I was lying about seeing any number very clearly. ... I saw no number. I heard no thought. ...
In October 2014, I said:
... Clearly, whether respondents are serious and honest or not is of central importance ...
and Loss Leader replied:
... Your honor, I object because it is devastating to my case. ...
(I corrected a small punctuation error)
and he posted this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx32b5igLwA
Also in October 2014, he added
...
All of my responses to any of your tests have been lies.

If I were you, I would discard all my responses as not being credible.

Now, the question is: If a moderator of a paranormal forum has no credibility, let alone special credibility, how can any person's credibility be assessed?
Notice that he said "all of my responses ... have been lies". Therefore, this seems to apply also to his statement
... I was kidding. I wasn't serious. ...
In addition, his sentence
If a moderator of a paranormal forum has no credibility, let alone special credibility, how can any person's credibility be assessed?
seemed to validate my point of view, that being a moderator (i.e. a person of authority, who has to constantly show s/he is qualified for the job) can increase credibility.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Well, you may perceive it as hostility and contempt, while in fact the attitudes are as would be expected in a forum that values scientific and critical thinking, neither of which you have shown a capacity for.

Now, I understand this perception is not your fault, of course--probably due to your brain chemistry warping your view of the world around you--but perhaps you can try to see things from our point of view for a bit, to try to understand the reception you've received here.

Keep in mind that Michel is convinced that everybody can hear his thoughts, and those who say they cannot are lying. What most people would instantly recognise as humour or sarcasm, he sees as a rare flash of honesty. In order to see things from our real point of view he would have to first accept that we are not lying when we say no-one can hear his thoughts, and he seems to be unable to even consider that as a possibility.
 
...
seemed to validate my point of view, that being a moderator (i.e. a person of authority, who has to constantly show s/he is qualified for the job) can increase credibility.

The only reason Einstein could get his work published was because he had his work vetted by a moderator on a paranormal forum.
Even Newton couldn't get around the moderator of a paranormal forum.

Can you guess why the universe around us can exist?
 
Comfyslippers and fromdownunder cannot really levitate, they are making a joke.

Of course we were, but has been shown time and time again Michel is so totally innocent of humour, he will believe pretty much anything, except his own personal inability to project numbers between one and four.

Michel, I have a used Bridge in Sydney that I am happy to sell you for the scrap metal price. It's called the Sydney Harbour Bridge, and I am the sole seller. Are you interested? I have plenty of offers, so you need to be quick in accepting.

And I can levitate it to your house, so there are no transport costs, as long as you do not have negative ether rays.

Norm
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
I replied to you, about a month ago:

I have three recordings, two from 2013 and one from 2014. They are "authentic" recordings of brief, abnormal and violent noises in my apartment (shock sounds, like when you hit an object with a hammer). However, I don't think it would be appropriate to share them here at this time, in view of your generally hostile and contemptuous attitudes with respect to my claims.
Did it occur to you that one of your neighbours might have been, for example, hanging a picture.

Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom