Good!
I hadn't offended a Wellingtonian today yet.
lol
Sent from my GT-S5660 using Tapatalk 2
Good!
I hadn't offended a Wellingtonian today yet.
The point is that it's pretty dumb to interpret NZ as being anyone's "errand boy" on the basis of something on the flag. When was the last time NZ did or didn't do something due to this historical detail?
2-3 generations1963-66 - The Malaysia Confrontation.. not really that long ago from a historical perspective.
I was a child at the time, but I remember it, and how upset my Dad was about what went on there.
I think it will actually be a lot closer than the boring old flag people are making out
2-3 generations
Of another countries flag on ours people keep mixing up with AusBut still within living memory
Of another countries flag on ours people keep mixing up with Aus
Sorry. I'm an idiot!I'm wasn't arguing against a flag change (I'm pro-change)
I was just answering Information Analyst's question...nothing more
1963-66 - The Malaysia Confrontation.. not really that long ago from a historical perspective.
I was a child at the time, but I remember it, and how upset my Dad was about what went on there.
Votings pretty much over people.
Picking old flag to unfortunately win, but by closer than expected
Yeah.I'd have $10 on 60-65% for status quo if the TAB were taking bets on it.
Yeah.
Turn out is apparently massive
Don't quote me but I think it isI tell what would be really ironic. If the turnout was higher than the general election.
Postal ballot is less effort, so greater compliance. There is also far less stringent checking of validity of the vote.I tell what would be really ironic. If the turnout was higher than the general election.