RE: clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

Status
Not open for further replies.
2115!

But Kirby said 261 other emails released Monday were marked Secret and "confidential," bringing the total to 2,115 emails that contain classified information. Twenty-two of Clinton's emails were previously classified Top Secret, meaning the correspondence contains information that would cause "exceptionally grave damage" to national security if disclosed.
Click to expand...

https://news.vice.com/article/the-f...ton-emails-were-just-released-and-one-was-not

Next steps? Vice has filed a motion asking for Vaughn index summarizing the classified data withheld.

State will now be working on producing Hillary's aides' emails.

The parties in Judicial Watch v. State are working on a discovery plan

The FBI is working a referral indictment investigating Hillary's use of her cowboy server and:

everyone wants to know what emails Hillary's cabal destroyed prior to turning them over to State.

Keep your eyes peeled here for the latest and greatest.
 
16.5 said:
From an actual letter from the actual FBI:

the FBI “has acknowledged generally that it is working on matters related to former Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server.”

This has been settled for two weeks....
Click to expand...

Someone alert the media ...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-clearance-amid-email-probe-letters-show.html
-- even as the Clinton email system remains the subject of an FBI investigation.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/29/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-state-department-review/
Clinton's server is also the subject of an FBI investigation, which has allowed her Republican opponents on the presidential campaign trail to raise the specter of possible indictment.


No doubt Hillary and her staff will be interviewed by the FBI "any day now"tm
 
TheL8Elvis said:
Someone alert the media ...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-clearance-amid-email-probe-letters-show.html
-- even as the Clinton email system remains the subject of an FBI investigation.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/29/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-state-department-review/
Clinton's server is also the subject of an FBI investigation, which has allowed her Republican opponents on the presidential campaign trail to raise the specter of possible indictment.


No doubt Hillary and her staff will be interviewed by the FBI "any day now"tm
Click to expand...

protip: the advantage of reading my posts is I quote the original source. Might be something you want to take a gander at...

There is no chance that Hillary consents to an interview with the FBI. Her IT guru didn't take the Fifth because he is losing his voice. C'mon man.
 
Last edited:
When will these charges be made? She needs to serve her 30 day misdemeanor jail time (same as for smoking pot) in 2016. So she can be president.
 
Reheat said:
It wouldn't. This term "born classified" is a new term that has been invented to circumvent the assertion by Clinton and her campaign's insistence that she had no classified information on her server.

Recall that at first she said she had no classified information on her server. This was later changed to no marked classified information on it. It's a ruse designed to fool voters.

I can not recall any classified document or information that wasn't classified at the time it was generated. In fact, I can not construct a reason why this would occur at all. The only reason this would occur is that someone screwed up by not classifying it.

Based on my experience the only classification level that widely varies is Confidential. Some agencies are over cautious and will classify at the Confidential level to be safe. The guidelines for Secret and Top Secret are pretty specific and I can't imagine any confusion. At the SAP level this would doubly apply. There can be no confusion by people with this level of access. It simply doesn't happen.

Quite frankly, since we already know she directed one of her minions to remove the heading on a classified document and send it unclassified, it is reasonable to assume this was done more than once. Was that a routine practice? If she had as much classified information on that server as has been reported, it's my guess that this was a routine procedure for convenience. That's the only plausible explanation that is reasonable. It is FACT that competent people who handle classified information simply could not screw up over 1000 times in failing to classify stuff that should be classified. It is very, very rare indeed. Well, it obviously was not so rare in Hillery's State Department.

This is undoubtedly an indictable offense. She hasn't been indicted for purely political reasons, not legal reasons.
Click to expand...

Read on, and learn that lack of imagination has little to do with reality.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/hil...-final-batch-hillary-clinton-s-emails-n528661

In releasing the final batch of 3,800 documents, the department also settled a long-running dispute over one sensitive email as intelligence agencies dropped a months-long demand an exchange on North Korea's nuclear program to be designated "top secret," the highest level of classification. The State Department, which had insisted the information was not classified at all, partially won its battle over the document as the intelligence community revised its initial assessment and determined the information was "secret," the next lower classification.

"Based on subsequent review, the intelligence community revisited its earlier assessment," State Department spokesman John Kirby told reporters. He added: "The original assessment was not correct and the document does not contain top secret information."
 
It's Supertuesday! I need to know NOW whether to send my money to Hillary or Bernie. When will the arrest be made? Is it a felony or misdeneanor crime? Who or what suffered from Hillary's crime?

I also get to "caucus" this week. i did not know it was a verb. should I ask about the criminal charges our candidate is going to get? We could throw all our votes to Bernie at the middle school where we meet.
 
Last edited:
beren said:
Yes, learning how officials speak about Tubman if the point of foi. Gotcha.

Just to be clear, I wouldn't vote for Hillary if a gun was to my head, and I have, at times, been worried about this "scandal" turning out to be a real thing, buy the more I read your posts, the more sure I am this is a witch hunt. 16.5, you are making the strongest pro- Hillary case in this thread.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


:rolleyes:
 
applecorped said:
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
I agree. Maybe if that side started talking about real, serious issues not Tubman, or started explaining why I should care instead of "teeheeing" like a drunk schoolgirl I might pay attention. The anti-hillary people in this thread are the ones who have made me not care about the entire issue.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
Tony Stark said:
Has she been indicted yet? LOL.
Click to expand...

This line of reasoning is about as good as the "hillary is done" thread that was originally posted about a year ago... the FBI is still doing its investigation and i should think that celebratory face planting on political opponents should wait until it has passed completely. Needless to say i would suggest the same of those who think she will be indicted at some point over this. Clairvoyance is a pipe dream.
 
beren said:
I agree. Maybe if that side started talking about real, serious issues not Tubman, or started explaining why I should care instead of "teeheeing" like a drunk schoolgirl I might pay attention. The anti-hillary people in this thread are the ones who have made me not care about the entire issue.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

yawn, you have been doing nothing but in here but complaining about this topic since April of 2015.

Yet you care enough to repeatedly post just how much you don't care.

Thanks, we get it.
 
Grizzly Bear said:
This line of reasoning is about as good as the "hillary is done" thread that was originally posted about a year ago... the FBI is still doing its investigation and i should think that celebratory face planting on political opponents should wait until it has passed completely. Needless to say i would suggest the same of those who think she will be indicted at some point over this. Clairvoyance is a pipe dream.
Click to expand...
One not need supernatural powers to understand the odds that she will will be indicted are low. Just the ability to think rationally. Though obviously, most Republicans lack that ability.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom