• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Craig4 said:
There is no god. Oh, and Hebrew.
Click to expand...

99% that in the end of your life you will think oppose – that God is exist.
My father was internationalist and communist .
In his deathbed confession delirium he said his great genial words: “I don’t believe in God but HE exists.”
 
Craig B said:
Good. The Turks abandoned the Arabic script which didn't suit their language because it is not very efficient at representing vowels. After the fall of the Ottoman regime, the Turkish Republic adopted the Latin alphabet (but not the Latin language.)

Now, does that mean that Turkish brains changed from the left to the right hemisphere? I don't think so. Do you require to reconstruct your brain each time you switch from writing a letter in Russian to writing one in HEBREW?

Perhaps you do need to do that!
Click to expand...

This is just my hypothesis that the writing direction affects the domination of a hemisphere in not an individual man but in a whole nation.
You need to have the ability, which would reflect on this hypothesis.
 
Nay_Sayer said:
I would love to know what sort of mangled sentence bathrobe without bathrobe is.

Besides I'm promoting my calendar which is 100x better than yours, Or in NC speak:

For sure people will to be shouting the holy ideas of 'eat every day' this is certain
Click to expand...

My Great Weeklyfold Calendar of New Saturday has been designed according the Book of Books and according 28th years Sun Cycle.
How can you compare your calendar with my one?!
My great eating lifestyle will give the life expectancy till 120 years old and even more.
 
ComfySlippers said:
Did your imaginary friend tell you this?
Click to expand...

Irrelevant question.

Think yourself.
Let's say a person believes in God in a religious or a secular format.
Suddenly he discovers that Language of his God that was dead for 2,500 years has resurrected and one of many God blieving nations has already spoken in this language for last 100 years.
Will this great fact generate in this man a very strong desire to teach his children this language?
I am convinced that yes of course.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Philosopher Alexander Piatigorsky told in his lections about Buddhist Philosophy that Sanskrit is very similar to Russian language.
Click to expand...
They are both Indo-European languages of the Satem group. See https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/IE_Main2_Satem.html.
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
I do believe him very much because was a very known professor of Cambridge.
Click to expand...
It's not a question of "belief". Go and look it up.
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
From another side I know very well that Russian language is very similar to Holy Resurrected Language of Holy Resurrected Israel.That’s why Sanscrit is very similar to Holy Resurrected Language.
Click to expand...
I notice you don't quote the Cambridge professor on that point, because it's complete nonsense.
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
But Sanckrit and Holy Language are the most ancient languages.
Click to expand...
If you mean, languages with writing, no they are not. Sumerian, and other languages written in cuneiform, as well as Ancient Egyptian, are much older.
The earliest known inscription in Hebrew is the Khirbet Qeiyafa Inscription (11th — 10th century BCE), if it can indeed be considered Hebrew at that early a stage.​
Wiki. Your ridiculous early date has been pulled by fundamentalist bible thumpers out of their arse, to "prove" that the Torah was written by Moses in the desert from words dictated by YHWH.
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
What of this 2 languages was the “mother language”?
This one that has more ancient writing.
Click to expand...
That is absurd. Anyway by that argument Hebrew is not the Holy Language. Sumerian is. In fact the word "Eden" seems to be Sumerian.
The Sumerian paradise is called Dilmun. (It should be noted, however that Eden (edinu) was also originally a Sumerian word, meaning ‘plain’ or “steppe’.​
http://www.rejectionofpascalswager.net/babylonian.html
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
From Alexander Piatigorsky I know that Sanskrit writing has born in 3 century BC.
The writing of Holy Language has born in 13 century BC.
That’s why it is clear that God Holy Language is the “mother language” of Sanskrit.
Click to expand...
That is completely moronic. Semitic languages had an alphabet very early. Undoubtedly it was invented by speakers of such languages; and that invention spread to many areas, including Greece and India. But that does not mean that Greek and Sanskrit are Semitic languages. This has been pointed out to you before, indeed many times.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Philosopher Alexander Piatigorsky told in his lections about Buddhist Philosophy that Sanskrit is very similar to Russian language.
I do believe him very much because was a very known professor of Cambridge.
From another side I know very well that Russian language is very similar to Holy Resurrected Language of Holy Resurrected Israel.
That’s why Sanscrit is very similar to Holy Resurrected Language.
But Sanckrit and Holy Language are the most ancient languages.
What of this 2 languages was the “mother language”?
This one that has more ancient writing.
From Alexander Piatigorsky I know that Sanskrit writing has born in 3 century BC.
The writing of Holy Language has born in 13 century BC.
That’s why it is clear that God Holy Language is the “mother language” of Sanskrit.
Click to expand...

It will be correct to order to those experts to make the scientist researching about the kinship between Holy Language and Sanskrit.
But in my post #3340 I proved that Sanscrit is the “language-daughter ” of God Holy Language using another way.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Irrelevant question.

Think yourself.
Let's say a person believes in God in a religious or a secular format.
Suddenly he discovers that Language of his God that was dead for 2,500 years has resurrected and one of many God blieving nations has already spoken in this language for last 100 years.
Will this great fact generate in this man a very strong desire to teach his children this language?
I am convinced that yes of course.
Click to expand...
How can people believe in God "in a secular format"? If they do believe in God how can they possibly believe that an infinite eternal omniscient God has a particular language?

This is gross primitivism. It is equivalent to crude anthropomorphic idolatry. Ancient Israelites, when they were nomadic goatherds who carried their God about in a box, believed he was their particular tribal God (the Ammonites had a different one [Judges 11:22-24] - who presumably lived in a different box) Of course each God spoke the language of the respective tribe. That is obvious.

But these primitive ideas are now obsolete, and believers no longer perceive Divinity in such ridiculous ways. Your ideas are several millennia out of date.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
It will be correct to order to those experts to make the scientist researching about the kinship between Holy Language and Sanskrit.
But in my post #3340 I proved that Sanscrit is the “language-daughter ” of God Holy Language using another way.
Click to expand...
No you didn't. #3340 is a regurgitation of the same gibberish.
 
MikeG said:
I think you're being harsh, and missing an opportunity. We should go with Cosmo's excellent idea, and force everyone who professes any sort of Christian affiliations to learn Hebrew.

Just imagine what that would do for the next survey of religiosity! Atheism would be polling around 70 or 80 % :D
Click to expand...

You want to say that if the man of Christian or Islam Civilizations will get the alternative order – or to teach his children the resurrected Jewish language – Hebrew or to become the atheist 70% -80% will choose to become an atheist.
That’s why we need to explain then that never mind that this language is the language of Israel Jews.
Extremely important for the them that this language is RESURRECTED LANGUAGE OF THEIR GOD that was died for about 2500 years – all the time when more and more nations began to believe in THIS GOD, so they had no ability to speak on their GOD’S LANGUAGE.
 
Craig B said:
The ones we might find would tell us that Sanskrit and Hebrew belong to two different language families.

NC is looking for language experts who will tell us that they belong to the same family, and that Indo-European languages entered Europe in the fifth century CE. It will take NC a long time to find such "experts", I fear.
Click to expand...

Please look in the historical contecst.
I can imagine that Arab language has the kinship with Sanskrit because Arabs was in India from 7th century.
I can imagine that Aramaic Language or so called Persian Empire Language has the kinship with Sanskrit because India was the part of Great Persian Empire in the 6-4 centuries BC.
(It is much more possible.)
But I can’t imagine that Sanscrit has the kinship with European languages that without any doubt have their roots in Latin language of Rome Empire.
 
ComfySlippers said:
He needs look only as far as the experts who think that Canada and Australia are in Europe. They are on the floor above the scientists who think that Salmonella and Fasting are good things. If they're not there check the cafeteria who's daily special is sheep **** and vodka.

The University of BullCrap.


Sent from my iNsomniPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Except “Salmonella” and “****” all is correct.
It will be good if it will be implemented the principle «one state language – one super state”
English Speaking Super State; Spanish and Portugal Languages Super State; Arab Language Super State; Mandarin Language Super State; Hindi Language Super State; Russian Language Super State.
GOD RESURRECTED LANGUAGE OF HOLY RESURRECTED ISRAEL WILL BECOME THE GLOBAL LINGUA FRANCA.
 
Craig4 said:
I know, I just wanted an excuse to use the word Hebrew again.
Click to expand...

You can’t get this “excuse” from GOD and HIS believers because this great language in the first step GOD RESURRECTED LANGUAGE and in the other step the language of Judah tribe and citizens of Judea – “Judahit” according Tanah text.
In this way to say for example the “Modern Judahit” is much more correct than to say the “Modern Ivrit” or “Modern Hebrew".
 
Craig B said:
That is simply utter ignorant nonsense and complete drivel.
... the discovery of the genetic relationship of the whole family of Indo-European languages is often attributed to Sir William Jones, a British judge in India who in a 1786 lecture (published 1788) observed that

The Sanskrit language, whatever be its antiquity, is of a wonderful structure; more perfect than the Greek, more copious than the Latin, and more exquisitely refined than either, yet bearing to both of them (i.e. Greek and Latin) stronger affinity, both in the roots of verbs and the forms of grammar, than could possibly have been produced by accident; so strong indeed, that no philologer could examine them all three, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists.​
Click to expand...

The “common source” exists!
And it is the GOD HOLY LANGUAGE of course!
But the mentality of this judge could not understand this simple fact just because he did not know the language of the Tanah.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom