Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?

[ComfySlippers]

I have been doing these tests in four different languages (English, French, Dutch and German), so I would be surprised if you saw all of them.

So what? What difference does the language you used make?

You have to understand that, after having been repeatedly branded "a schizophrenic" and "mentally ill", and "a person it is better not to talk to", there are limits to my patience with you (plural, not you particularly).

You told us the story of your mental illness. It's here in black & white.
If there are limits to your patience why do you keep coming back to repeat the same nonsense?
People have patiently explained time and time again why your tests are silly. They are not even tests.

So, if you want to switch from "jerk level" (which is your level right now I am afraid) to my "Ph.D. level", I suggest a little exercise for you: explain honestly what exactly Tiktaalik meant when she said:

(her number was correct), and what Daylightstar meant when he said:

There you go again calling me a jerk. Your "Ph.D. level" is meaningless as long as you insist on posting this nonsense.

You have been told over and over that you have problems comprehending what people actually mean when they say things.
No one has ever agreed that you are telepathic. No one has ever received your thoughts.
No one ever will because.... there is no such thing as telepathy.

This would already be pretty good, but still not enough. I also suggest that you participate in this scientific experiment, instead of constantly explaining to me that I am crazy.
I believe that, when you are a victim of a collective criminal phenomenon, and a collective lie, you not only have a right, but also a duty to defend yourself, and to defend the truth.

So, to recap you insist that we are all liars, jerks and part of a massive lying collective who are conspiring to hide the fact that you are telepathic.
Like most here I have no intention of participating in any of your tests. They are not tests. They are your personal paranoid delusional fantasy.

So, put your PhD to work, get out your research notes and answer my questions for the benefit of all us jerks:

...please state the total number of these "tests" you have started here over the years.
Please also give the total number you've started on all the other websites. You'll know the number, (I do), because these are all super real scientific tests.

Include the date you made the initial request, the website and the wording of your demands.

 

[Daylightstar]

No, not in any significant way, as far as I can remember, not even in nightmares. However, in view of the considerable intensity of the persecution by the voices (and other forms of persecution, for example violent and abnormal noises in my apartment), it seems reasonable to me to assume that there is some relationship between the persecution on the one hand, and my physical problems on the other hand.

Like I said, you're still alive.
What kind of insignificant physical problem did those voice cause you to experience?

You have previously stated that you have made recordings of those noises, can you share such a recording?

 

[Michel H]

...
So, put your PhD to work, get out your research notes and answer my questions for the benefit of all us jerks:

...please state the total number of these "tests" you have started here over the years.
Please also give the total number you've started on all the other websites. You'll know the number, (I do), because these are all super real scientific tests.

Include the date you made the initial request, the website and the wording of your demands.

Here I can tell you something you will perhaps like: I don't know myself exactly how many tests I have done on this forum. Because the various test threads (which were initially separate, when I started them) were almost always promptly merged by the moderator team, the exact number is a little hard (but not very hard) to figure out. But this is something I would like to do in the near future: just count how many tests I have already done here.

 

[Michel H]

...
You have previously stated that you have made recordings of those noises, can you share such a recording?

Yes, I have made a few audio recordings, although they are not very recent. Sharing them here is something I could do if you adopted a more honest attitude regarding the real meaning of the telepathy testimonies I have quoted, and if the participation in my tests was less skeletal and more substantial, with a more satisfactory open-mindedness.

 

[ComfySlippers]

Here I can tell you something you will perhaps like: I don't know myself exactly how many tests I have done on this forum. Because the various test threads (which were initially separate, when I started them) were almost always promptly merged by the moderator team, the exact number is a little hard (but not very hard) to figure out. But this is something I would like to do in the near future: just count how many tests I have already done here.

OK. So you've no record of all your scientificky tests. Years of them.
...because they're all merged into one place. That makes it more difficult for you to find and count them.
You ask me to count them for you though!
Why don't you know the answer Michel? These are serious tests after all.
Are you saying you don't keep records of these things?
That you merely drop by, demand people play, then leave?
Good grief. Not what I'd expect from a PhD.

A pretty poor way to demonstrate how seriously you take your own tests. Yet you demand to be taken seriously by us jerks. How rude.

But what about the rest of my question?
You seem to have forgotten to answer it.
I'll remind you:
(Underlining mine)

...please state the total number of these "tests" you have started here over the years.
Please also give the total number you've started on all the other websites. You'll know the number, (I do), because these are all super real scientific tests.

Include the date you made the initial request, the website and the wording of your demands.

Surely you will have records of all those tests?
Years of research after all.

Yes, I have made a few audio recordings, although they are not very recent. Sharing them here is something I could do if you adopted a more honest attitude regarding the real meaning of the telepathy testimonies I have quoted, and if the participation in my tests was less skeletal and more substantial, with a more satisfactory open-mindedness.

Well well well. You have evidence. Irrefutable proof.
Yet you won't show it unless everyone agrees to your rules.
That's rather like your "tests" isn't it Michel?
... You expect people to dance at your command.

 

[Daylightstar]

Yes, I have made a few audio recordings, although they are not very recent. Sharing them here is something I could do if you adopted a more honest attitude regarding the real meaning of the telepathy testimonies I have quoted, and if the participation in my tests was less skeletal and more substantial, with a more satisfactory open-mindedness.

What you can do is put some of that audio in a zip file (if audio is in non directly supported format) making sure the zip file does not exceed 250kb.

Let's hear some of these 'violent and abnormal noises'.

E.T.A.: Ehm, forgot to mention, the zip file is a supported file type for attachment to a post, the zip file containing the audio can be attached to a post.

 

[Michel H]

...But this is something I would like to do in the near future: just count how many tests I have already done here.

OK. So you've no record of all your scientificky tests. Years of them.
...because they're all merged into one place. That makes it more difficult for you to find and count them.
You ask me to count them for you though! ...

No, no, I don't expect you to do this job for me (although you may, if you want). This is something I should do, I think.

 

[Michel H]

What you can do is put some of that audio in a zip file (if audio is in non directly supported format) making sure the zip file does not exceed 250kb.

Let's hear some of these 'violent and abnormal noises'.

E.T.A.: Ehm, forgot to mention, the zip file is a supported file type for attachment to a post, the zip file containing the audio can be attached to a post.

OK, thank you for the info, I shall perhaps use it later.

 

[ComfySlippers]

No, no, I don't expect you to do this job for me (although you may, if you want). This is something I should do, I think.

What I think doesn't matter. After all... I'm a jerk.
I just find it surprising that after all theses years of "tests" you have no record of them

I notice you are reluctant , still, to answer the rest of my question.

...Please also give the total number you've started on all the other websites. You'll know the number, (I do), because these are all super real scientific tests.

Include the date you made the initial request, the website and the wording of your demands.

Why is that?

Here's your chance to shine Michel. Show all the results from all your many tests from all these years on all the many websites.

 

[ComfySlippers]

I'm upset Michel.
You have time to play in your thread on the Australian forum but not to answer my question.
I thought you were desperate to get to the bottom of this problem.
Is that not the case? Is there another reason that you keep posting these "tests" everywhere?

I notice that you were asked a question over there:

Re: A long distance telepathy test: which word did I write?
Postby quarky » Sun Feb 28, 2016 6:13 am

yet, one wonders...

why the ellipse?

wouldn't the circle be more fair?
less bias?

A normal answer to that would be along the lines of:
"Ha ha ha"

Yet, oblivious to the fact that the question wasn't serious, you answer:

It's because of the elongate nature of the word I wrote (whether it is "Sydney", "Brisbane", "Auckland" or "Hamilton"), its length is significantly larger than its height. Often, I do tests with single digits or single letters as targets; in these cases, I just circle the digit or the letter.

That's a lot of typing when you could be answering my question:

...Please also give the total number you've started on all the other websites. You'll know the number, (I do), because these are all super real scientific tests.

Include the date you made the initial request, the website and the wording of your demands.

Having this data available to us jerks might help with your tests.
In fact, post those audio recordings while you're at it.
<----Looky, my Skype address is over there for all to see. Send them to me.

I'd hate to think you were ignoring me on such an important issue Michel.

 

[Michel H]

I'm upset Michel.
You have time to play in your thread on the Australian forum but not to answer my question.
I thought you were desperate to get to the bottom of this problem.
Is that not the case? Is there another reason that you keep posting these "tests" everywhere?

I notice that you were asked a question over there:


A normal answer to that would be along the lines of:
"Ha ha ha"

Yet, oblivious to the fact that the question wasn't serious, you answer:


That's a lot of typing when you could be answering my question:


Having this data available to us jerks might help with your tests.
In fact, post those audio recordings while you're at it.
<----Looky, my Skype address is over there for all to see. Send them to me.

I'd hate to think you were ignoring me on such an important issue Michel.

Jealous? Well, I think quarky has been very helpful (unlike you, he did provide an answer equal to one of the four cities in my test, note however I am not saying whether his answer is correct or not), so he may have gotten priority over you. I try to do what is best for my scientific project.

 

[abaddon]

Jealous? Well, I think quarky has been very helpful (unlike you, he did provide an answer equal to one of the four cities in my test, note however I am not saying whether his answer is correct or not), so he may have gotten priority over you. I try to do what is best for my scientific project.

For pete's sake. Quarky is openly mocking you over there.

 

[Michel H]

For pete's sake. Quarky is openly mocking you over there.

I don't think so, he did give an answer to the test (one of the four cities). I also note you got a remark over there because of your aggressive behavior.

 

[ComfySlippers]

Jealous? Well, I think quarky has been very helpful (unlike you, he did provide an answer equal to one of the four cities in my test, note however I am not saying whether his answer is correct or not), so he may have gotten priority over you. I try to do what is best for my scientific project.

I'm now a Jealous Jerk. Awesome.

In a bid to assist with your scientifikity research let us analyse your friend quarky's helpfulness:

quarky wrote:
Using some statistical analyses, we can determine that in a choice of four options, the first and last are generally less likely to be correct.
That leaves Brisbane and Auckland.

And, really...who cares about Brisbane.

It's Auckland, right?

When do we get to know the answer?

To which you replied:

quarky, the city I wrote was determined using a random number generator, this one: https://www.random.org/integers/.
So, "Sydney", "Brisbane", "Auckland" and "Hamilton" are all equally likely (same probability of 25% for each).

I don't know myself when I'll give the answer, perhaps in 24 to 48 hours.

Oh look, there's our old friend the random number generator again.
The one that picks a number from one to four.

quarky replies:

Cheater!
Random # generator!?!?

No wonder my intuition was all clogged up.

Hell,
Now I don't even want to know the outcome.

You knew that intuitive stuff only responds to actual mental output from the sender, right?

So, you weren't even thinking of any of these 4 choices yourself?

(I kind-of want my money back.)

(Must admit, though...pretty thrilled to have a new nut-case on board. Got a weak spot for them.)

He's being "very helpful" isn't he.
You seem, yet again, to have missed the humour and the fact that he called you a nut-case. You neglected to call him a Jerk for that.

Your response is:

You need not worry, quarky, the telepathic waves were not sent out by the random number generator, but by a human being, namely myself. Using a random number generator is important to make this test rigorous. Without it, I could somehow choose the city name I "like" best and, if you do the same, I could end up with a falsely positive conclusion about telepathy, because of a possible correlation between what you and me like. So, although the city was decided by the random number generator, I wrote its name on my sheet of paper, I surrounded it with an ellipse, and I said it with my voice.

I'm only quoting the full responses as I would hate for you to forget to mention them here.
They affect your test you see.
It's interesting to see that your random number generator picking a number from one to four makes your test rigorous.
How is this different from your other tests where you ask people to guess a number from.... one to four?

As you are trying to do what is best for your rigorous scientific project could you now answer my question please:

...Please also give the total number you've started on all the other websites. You'll know the number, (I do), because these are all super real scientific tests.

Include the date you made the initial request, the website and the wording of your demands.

 

[Daylightstar]

OK, thank you for the info, I shall perhaps use it later.

You really ought to do it soon. It'd be the only thing you have to show for any of your claims.

 

[Michel H]

I'm now a Jealous Jerk. Awesome.

In a bid to assist with your scientifikity research let us analyse your friend quarky's helpfulness:



To which you replied:


Oh look, there's our old friend the random number generator again.
The one that picks a number from one to four.

quarky replies:


He's being "very helpful" isn't he.
You seem, yet again, to have missed the humour and the fact that he called you a nut-case. You neglected to call him a Jerk for that.

Your response is:


I'm only quoting the full responses as I would hate for you to forget to mention them here.
They affect your test you see.

As you are trying to do what is best for your scientific project could you now answer my question please:

Well, if you provide an answer to the test (one of the four cities), I will probably consider your request more favorably. I try to treat everybody in an equal way. If you do a good job, you could perhaps even beat him, who knows?

 

[p0lka]

Yes, I have made a few audio recordings, although they are not very recent. Sharing them here is something I could do if you adopted a more honest attitude regarding the real meaning of the telepathy testimonies I have quoted, and if the participation in my tests was less skeletal and more substantial, with a more satisfactory open-mindedness.

you wont show your recordings until people stop being impartial?
that is not how evidence works.

Well, if you provide an answer to the test (one of the four cities), I will probably consider your request more favorably. I try to treat everybody in an equal way. If you do a good job, you could perhaps even beat him, who knows?

Do you understand that the highlited is a complete contradiction.

 

[ComfySlippers]

Well, if you provide an answer to the test (one of the four cities), I will probably consider your request more favorably. I try to treat everybody in an equal way. If you do a good job, you could perhaps even beat him, who knows.

There seems to be a communication error here Michel.
It might be useful to your testing procedure if, when asked for the many previous results, you simply refer to your rigorous note-taking and provide them.

Also, you need to understand that I am not asking for myself, as I know the answers. I merely wish to help the other Jerks here who might be unaware of all your many other tests both here and elsewhere.

It's commendable that you treat everybody in an equal way. I trust you will be calling quarky a Jerk soon. He did, after all, mock you and call you a nut-case.

I'm unsure about your comment regarding "beating" quarky.
Are you playing a game?

I await your answer to my question:

...Please also give the total number you've started on all the other websites. You'll know the number, (I do), because these are all super real scientific tests.

Include the date you made the initial request, the website and the wording of your demands.

 

[Michel H]

There seems to be a communication error here Michel.
It might be useful to your testing procedure if, when asked for the many previous results, you simply refer to your rigorous note-taking and provide them.

Also, you need to understand that I am not asking for myself, as I know the answers. I merely wish to help the other Jerks here who might be unaware of all your many other tests both here and elsewhere.

It's commendable that you treat everybody in an equal way. I trust you will be calling quarky a Jerk soon. He did, after all, mock you and call you a nut-case.

I'm unsure about your comment regarding "beating" quarky.
Are you playing a game?

I await your answer to my question:

Well you can beat people in presidential elections too (much talked about these days). I don't care much about insults, this is just a superficial aspect to me. You can be very cruel with someone, while being apparently very polite, and, conversely, you can be very good with another person while insulting him/her every five minutes.

This forum (compared with others) seems to have developed a rather scary culture of violence and arrogance. This can be done apparently within strict rules, applied in a unbalanced way. I wonder if it could be Randi who has injected these kinds of ideas into your minds (but he is probably not the only one who is responsible). The trouble is, you seem to be listening only to yourselves, and never want to change. I try to help you, to show you the way, but you don't care.

 

[Daylightstar]

So, Michel H, while we wait for you to post some audio you claim you have, what kind of insignificant physical problem did the voices cause you to experience?:

Like I said, you're still alive.
What kind of insignificant physical problem did those voice cause you to experience?
...