• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The real alien conspiracy

Malbec said:
Endless .
The "imaginary" money supply theory is probably taught in junior economic classes already , and Donald's profile can be approached from many directions -- but kick off with Gilead Securities Inc .
Click to expand...

You have endless sources, yet offer none?
 
It is true that Rumsfeld made money from Tamiflu, as he had a parcel of shares and was on the board iirc. The innuendo that goes with it though, not so much.
 
Kid Eager said:
It is true that Rumsfeld made money from Tamiflu, as he had a parcel of shares and was on the board iirc. The innuendo that goes with it though, not so much.
Click to expand...

Yes Cosmic Yak kindly supplied a source. But stating there are numerous sources, is not the same as providing one. Especially when they fail to offer the innuendo substance.

As fir "imaginary money", economics are taught at school. But they, and common sense, don't support the claims being made. Like "False Flag" it is a phrase being thrown around by somebody who seems not to know what it actually means. Certainly not where the value of the money comes from.

It really does seem schoolboyish, which would not be a problem if he were asking if such things were relevant, instead of blithely making the grand statements.
 
Malbec said:
Endless .

The "imaginary" money supply theory is probably taught in junior economic classes already , and Donald's profile can be approached from many directions -- but kick off with Gilead Securities Inc .
Click to expand...


Sorry, even school kids laugh at numpties who talk about "imaginary money".

It's a favourite amongst the FOTL-Wafflers who are, to put it kindly, stupid cockwombles.

There's nothing wrong with admitting you don't understand something. Even if that something is as simple a concept as money. But you can't pretend the things you don't understand are invisible.
Well... you can but the four year olds laugh at you in school.
 
Malbec said:
What's a trillion discrepancy either way when it's all imaginary money ?
Also ask Donald whether he personally made millions or billions from that useless vaccination he sold round the world .
Used it for Avian and then Swine .
I was amazed it did not also work for Ebola or for clearing up Mozzie rashes .But Tamiflu was still a great little earner .
Click to expand...

If the money is imaginary then technically Rumsfeld didn't make any.

The Avian and Swine flues have been contained thanks to that "worthless vaccine".

It didn't work for Ebola because Ebola is not a flu virus.

People like you made it easy to stop believing in UFOs, and much of the UFO crowd has the same inability to grasp basic concepts of reality, and process information intelligently.

You chose not to live in a fact-based world, but one where your myopic world-view and over inflated ego allow you to intellectually drift.
 
Threads like these always make me wonder how future archaeologists of a later sentient race would deduce our existence.

Assume it takes >10 M years or so for a new one to evolve once we are gone.

All of our constructions will be long gone, even the pyramids won't last that long.
Some human skeletons might be found, and the relative abundance during an extinction event would at least show we are successful.
But the most telling things would, in my opinion be the fact that there is a rather uniform layer of hydrocarbons (the remnants of our plastics) and metals like gold/iron/aluminium/copper, deposited as our cities decay. This layer will NOT conform element distribution as would be expected by natural means. In fact, they would be found on areas that were clearly mountain less plains, with no plausible mechanism on why these elements would aggregate there.

The fact that we have found no such things suggest that IF an intelligence evolved on earth before us, they never got to metalworking stages. Not even an easily found metal like gold.
 
sonjouten said:
. If i recall when Clinton asked about them he was told "it's best if you don't know."
Click to expand...

I have a homework assignment for you. Track the provenance of that quote. If you find no source for it, change your beliefs about it. If the only sources you find for it are untrustworthy, change your beliefs about it. If you find the quote, research the context around it. If the surrounding context makes the quote mean something other then what you've been led to believe, change your beliefs. A wise man once said "Challenge your assumptions. Challenge your assumptions or they will challenge you".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom