Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Michel H said:
...
Also, a reason why I might consult a psychiatrist (or, perhaps, a psychologist) could be to just do a test with him/her in his/her office, I have already done this twice, with two psychiatrists.
Click to expand...

They need to do this to study you, to determine the clinical presentation.
They will appear to support you to lower the bar for you to present.
 
Daylightstar said:
Marplots is probably just being individualistic, having his own opinion, make up his own mind, think for himself and be different, that sort of thing .....
Click to expand...

Michel H said:
Good, thank you for your answer, marplots. I can't reveal yet whether it is correct or not.
Click to expand...

No marplots is likeable enough. I will happily state that we disagree a lot, but he is a decent enough proponent.

Michel has hijacked him. And it is no different than 011. Typo intentional.
 
Well, he is free to post as he pleases, it's easy enough. I suppose he doesn't only post in his best moments ;)
 
Yes, Marplots. Highly superior intelligence, former pharmacist and felon. Probably the felony was for narcotics -- and if so, I like him more, not less.

Strangely affectless, and often glib, as if something's a little off -- maybe he just likes to toy with people, or maybe it's something else. Maybe he's always bored.

Never lets anything human through, really.

Consistently argues in the service of process, or using your noodle.

Once tried to help Ron T. with some problem-solving regarding an audio book RT was trying to apportion. Instantly grasped the problem (basically an algebra problem) but was patient about explaining it, etc.

etc. etc.
 
George 152 said:
Don't play with the mentally ill
Click to expand...

That is my usual policy. In this case, I thought if all of us answered the same, it would skew the results away from the predicted 25%, in a very dramatic way.

I wouldn't want to directly harm someone I don't know though. Is it the mere engagement that does the harm? That seems like a pretty stiff standard.
 
marplots said:
That is my usual policy. In this case, I thought if all of us answered the same, it would skew the results away from the predicted 25%, in a very dramatic way.
...
Click to expand...

Which is why you printed in bold followed by "as well". If several other posters had chosen to do the same, there'd be a rather large 25% chance of that being the actual answer .... if any exist already, of course.
That would feed Michel H's delusion of being telepathic without any actual telepathy being present and having shown any telepathy to occur.

It's best not to feed such delusions. One might even say the the delusional and any consequences the delusional may suffer don't matter, besides that it would still be a poor show.

E.T.A.: But then again, similar has been done before as mockery ;)
 
Last edited:
No matter what we do or say - guess a random answer, refuse to guess an answer, all give the same answer, be sarcastic, urge him to seek professional help - Michel will incorporate it into his delusion. That is what the 60+ pages of this thread tell us.
 
Pixel42 said:
No matter what we do or say - guess a random answer, refuse to guess an answer, all give the same answer, be sarcastic, urge him to seek professional help - Michel will incorporate it into his delusion. That is what the 60+ pages of this thread tell us.
Click to expand...

Yes, this is clearly what has been happening.
 
Daylightstar said:
Which is why you printed in bold followed by "as well". If several other posters had chosen to do the same, there'd be a rather large 25% chance of that being the actual answer .... if any exist already, of course.
That would feed Michel H's delusion of being telepathic without any actual telepathy being present and having shown any telepathy to occur.

It's best not to feed such delusions. One might even say the the delusional and any consequences the delusional may suffer don't matter, besides that it would still be a poor show.

E.T.A.: But then again, similar has been done before as mockery ;)
Click to expand...

I will take my chastisement like a man and seek to sin no more.

(I was actually thinking Aukland anyway.)
 
marplots said:
That is my usual policy. In this case, I thought if all of us answered the same, it would skew the results away from the predicted 25%, in a very dramatic way.

I wouldn't want to directly harm someone I don't know though. Is it the mere engagement that does the harm? That seems like a pretty stiff standard.
Click to expand...

We tried that before. It didn't work. It will never work.
 
marplots said:
I will take my chastisement like a man and seek to sin no more.

(I was actually thinking Aukland anyway.)
Click to expand...
What is your answer to this test, then, marplots? Is it still Brisbane, is it Auckland (Aukland is not one of the four allowed answers of this test), or do you want me to cancel your answer?
Don't let yourself get influenced too much or manipulated by other posters of this forum, who may have very bad intentions.
 
Michel H said:
What is your answer to this test, then, marplots? Is it still Brisbane, is it Auckland (Aukland is not one of the four allowed answers of this test), or do you want me to cancel your answer?
Don't let yourself get influenced too much or manipulated by other posters of this forum, who may have very bad intentions.
Click to expand...

Please cancel my answer. I too had bad intentions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom