RE: clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

Status
Not open for further replies.
If it's a conspiracy theory is the FBI using Mulder and Scully to not investigate HRC?
 
Here's an interesting article about the perceived psychological effects of Hillary's delayed disclosure and constantly changing stories regarding her emails:

Clinton’s critical mistake in handling her email release

Leaving a blank space, figuratively or literally, opens the door even wider to distrust and distancing.

“The difference between unintentional and intentional hiding may appear subtle, but it leads to a 180-degree flip in effects,” said Lamberton, who wasn’t involved in the Harvard study.

Thus her omissions (like destroying tens of thousands of emails) might even be more serious than her lies of commission.
 
While she was First Lady of Arkansas she took bribes totaling $100,000 from a lawyer for Tyson Foods.
The germane quote from the article:
There were no official investigations of the trading and Clinton was never charged with any wrongdoing.
I know such technicalities have never bothered Republicans when accusing Democrats.

In other words, when you've got nothing you throw **** against the wall and hope it sticks. At the very least, the willful ignorant will lap it up and repeat it.

Benghazi...
Cowboy Server...
 
The germane quote from the article: I know such technicalities have never bothered Republicans when accusing Democrats.

In other words, when you've got nothing you throw **** against the wall and hope it sticks. At the very least, the willful ignorant will lap it up and repeat it.

Benghazi...
Cowboy Server...

:rolleyes:

Hillary, Not Convicted Yet! That is one hell of a campaign slogan. Talk about HDS...
 
And stop trying to change the definitions of words. We all know what HDS is and know who the poster boy is for the movement. As you ought to be aware, I'm not even a Hillary supporter, given my druthers. I suffer from Hillary Derangement Syndrome Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. I just can't stop myself from pointing out the mental condition when I see it.

Apparently, 16.5 and applecorped missed this.
 
Sounds like exactly what I have repeatedly proposed in this thread. Thanks for the reminder.

Not from what I've seen you post in this thread. Two examples are you take Hillary's word as truth and you act like she isn't being investigated, just the server.

So you're welcome for the reminder.
 
And stop trying to change the definitions of words.

No ONE is changing the definition of words! The words are being used properly! It's a term, made up by one group, trying to disparage another!
Having it turned around on the other group is not redefining words! The words are being used correctly. It is deranged the way some HRC supporters praise their idol no matter what she does! I get that the other team doesn't like it! So what? It is being used correct. Shillaries have HDS!
 
Not from what I've seen you post in this thread. Two examples are you take Hillary's word as truth and you act like she isn't being investigated, just the server.

So you're welcome for the reminder.
I thought you were waiting for information from the investigation to base your understanding on. So far, the investigation has publicly stated that they are investigating the server. Would you mind quoting a statement from the FBI that Clinton herself is being investigated?

Also, giving more weight to the claims of the only first hand account we have is not 'taking Hillary's word as truth'. Maybe it looks that way to one who has already decided she's guilty?
 
Avid readers will recognize the CBS (concession by smiley). Off with you now. Fox has a new revelation by "an official" that Hillary put someone's life in jeopardy by passing along something something something that was already in the newspapers.

Go get 'er!
"concession by smiley"

Like.
 
I thought you were waiting for information from the investigation to base your understanding on. So far, the investigation has publicly stated that they are investigating the server. Would you mind quoting a statement from the FBI that Clinton herself is being investigated?

Also, giving more weight to the claims of the only first hand account we have is not 'taking Hillary's word as truth'. Maybe it looks that way to one who has already decided she's guilty?

Yeah I'm just going to scroll past your posts from now on. Have a good day.
 
I guess Participating in a reasonable discussion must be too difficult for some posters.

From a right wing blog today:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...l_chain_exposed_cia_asset_in_afghanistan.html

As these revelations keep dribbling out, you can sense the noose tightening around Clinton. But there is still no indication that Clinton herself is the target of an FBI investigation, although the use of her unsecure server is.
 
I guess Participating in a reasonable discussion must be too difficult for some posters.

From a right wing blog today:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...l_chain_exposed_cia_asset_in_afghanistan.html

As these revelations keep dribbling out, you can sense the noose tightening around Clinton. But there is still no indication that Clinton herself is the target of an FBI investigation, although the use of her unsecure server is.
I notice they include "unsecure server" without mentioning the State Dept email option for Clinton was also considered unsecure.
 
But there is still no indication that Clinton herself is the target of an FBI investigation, although the use of her unsecure server is.[/I]

"The bureau has acknowledged generally that it is working on matters related to former secretary Clinton's use of a private e-mail server."

Her use! That would be HER!

Your post is the perfect example of why HDS applies, to HRC devotees!
 
I notice they include "unsecure server" without mentioning the State Dept email option for Clinton was also considered unsecure.

Great post. For the first time you've just admitted that she is incompetent. She was the head of the Department that had an insecure server, instead used her own which was also insecure. What a shining example of a bureaucrat who wants to be President. Maybe you're starting to get it, finally..

Maybe she can now list this as an accomplishment. In charge of two insecure email system as the Chief Diplomat of the US. That should look great on her otherwise empty resume! :D
 
Last edited:
Great post. For the first time you've just admitted that she is incompetent. She was the head of the Department that had an insecure server, instead used her own which was also insecure. What a shining example of a bureaucrat who wants to be President. Maybe you're starting to get it, finally..

"unsecure server" = not able to contain classified email
-vs-
"Secure server" = able to contain classified email

I thought you claimed to know about classified info, but you don't seem to understand simple terminology ???
 
"unsecure server" = not able to contain classified email
-vs-
"Secure server" = able to contain classified email

I thought you claimed to know about classified info, but you don't seem to understand simple terminology ???

I really don't mind being corrected by someone who knows what they're talking about, on the other hand..

It would have been more easily understood what the original poster was talking about (which is YOUR assumption that poster did know) if NIPERNET or SIPERNET had been used. In the future please play your silly semantic games with someone who gives a rat's ass about an opinion of my qualifications.
 
Last edited:
Great post. For the first time you've just admitted that she is incompetent. She was the head of the Department that had an insecure server, instead used her own which was also insecure. What a shining example of a bureaucrat who wants to be President. Maybe you're starting to get it, finally..

Maybe she can now list this as an accomplishment. In charge of two insecure email system as the Chief Diplomat of the US. That should look great on her otherwise empty resume! :D
You haven't been paying attention at all. :rolleyes:

You missed this post or completely missed the point of it.
 
Last edited:
You haven't been paying attention at all. :rolleyes:

You missed this post or completely missed the point of it.

Oh, but I have paid attention to the level of classification of the alleged emails in Rice's and Powell's email. Do you know what level they were? What was the classification level of some on Clinton's server? Where did each originate?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom