The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bjarne said:
Because this is one of relative few small bills we have to pay for a nice coherence universe (not conflicting with science itself) and because this part of relativity always is the place sceptics in decades have attached the theory.
Click to expand...

Theories are not judged on whether they are nice. They are judged on wether they make sense and can be confirmed by observation (and wether the math works).

Your "theory" may be nice, but it makes no sense, and the math is rubbish.

Bjarne: You keep evading the issue, but your "theory" requires that there is some sort of friction between bodies in motion and the surrounding space. There isn't.

(It requires a lot of other rubbish, but this at least, you should be able to understand.)

Hans
 
Bjarne said:
This is a lie, the interpretation of the Michelson-Morley experiment, is that Earth is not colliding with a ether.
Click to expand...
That is really ignorant, Bjarne.
The Michelson-Morley experiments were designed to detect the movement of the Earth through an aether. It did not detect any movement.
The Michelson-Morley experiments were not designed to detect any collisions of an aether with the Earth :eye-poppi!.

There is no point in giving you sources Bjarne since you display a deep ignorance of even basic science in this and other threads. But for other people reading this thread: The Michelson-Morley experiments rule out an aether that the Earth is moving through. But an even stranger aether is one that sticks to the Earth's surface. See Aether drag hypothesis
 
Bjarne said:
Now lets say that SR will fall apart, within few years, which experimental interpretation must have went wrong ?
Click to expand...
A dumb question, Bjarne.
SR is supported by hundreds of experiments. All of them would have to be physically wrong (not interpreted wrongly) :jaw-dropp!
Take the basic muon experiment as an example. Muons decay. The physical fact is that muons from cosmic rays moving at close to the speed of light have longer lifetimes than muons travelling at low speeds in nuclear reactors.
 
Mmm OK, let's look at a few aspects in post #1.......



Bjarne said:
  • The one is Anisotropic Dark Flow Acceleration (DFA).
  • The other is Relativistic Resistance against Motion (RR).
  • The consequences for our picture of the Universe are tremendous.
  • Prediction: The theory of relativity will begin to fall apart already this year (2016) and next year 2017, when the theory of relativity will be tested on board the ISS and galileo 5 & 6.
Click to expand...

OK, prediction noted. We shall see .....

Let's look at another part.

The Allais Effect
Common for all reported Allais Effect [2] phenomena is acceleration of Earth away from DFAD.
All kinds of Allais Effects as well as gravitational anomalies reported by an eclipse – right before an eclipse or after an eclipse – are all caused due to interaction with DFA.

[imgw=640]http://science27.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/aa31.jpg[/imgw]
Figure 2.

The illustration shows a solar eclipse where the moon is located 1,500 km higher relative to a parallel, linear line, ‘X’, between the Sun and Earth. This corresponds to approx. 0.5°. In that way, the Moon’s acceleration due to gravity pulls the Earth in the northern direction with an acceleration which can be calculated by GM/r2 divided by a factor of 180 = 0.0000007m/s2(70 μgal).
Click to expand...

Oops! The Moon is 1,500km (appr. half a moon diameter) above the Sun - Earth axis!??? But the putative Allais effect occurs during a total eclipse.

Not much of an explanation. Also the explanation is based on the gravity interaction between the Moon and Earth, which is the same during a solar eclipse as at any other new moon situation.

Oh, well.

Ahh, now it gets fun:

2. Relativistic Resistance.
Preface
We know that it requires ever more energy to maintain constant acceleration.
No scientific method has ever proven that such relativistic resistance against motion only applies during the acceleration period.
Click to expand...

Uhm, wrong. It has specifically been shown, both theoretically and experimentally that energy is only consumed during acceleration.

This theory claims that resistance against motion also happens by constant speed. We will refer to this as Relativistic Resistance against Motion (Hereafter “RR”). This, of course, means that Newton’s first law is incorrect.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, this is not the case.

When the energy / force responsible for accelerating an object stops pushing an object forward, the object decelerates. This is a universal law of nature, so all orbits are affected. Note that this only applies for matter, not for massless particles.
Click to expand...

Only, this is not what happens. Without any forces (and in this context, gravity acts as a force) acting on it, an object maintains its direction and velocity indefinitely. This is shown mathematically and empirically.

Bjarne has been informed about this several years ago, but has chosen to ignore it.

Hans
 
Bjarne said:
This is a lie, we have his own words at the video that he was kicked
Click to expand...
So you are parroting Arp's lie without checking it, Bjarne.
Halton Arp was not fired from any job.
Halton Arp, 86, Dies; Astronomer Challenged Big Bang Theory
As Dr. Arp’s colleagues lost patience with his quest, he was no longer invited to speak at major conferences, and his observing time on the mighty 200-inch telescope began to dry up. Warned in the early 1980s that his research program was unproductive, he refused to change course. Finally, he refused to submit a proposal at all on the grounds that everyone knew what he was doing. He got no time at all.

Dr. Arp took early retirement and joined the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics near Munich, where he continued to promote his theories. He told his own side of the redshift story in a 1989 book, “Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies.”
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Mudcat said:
You might want to reconsider the boldened part or explain what force it is keeps your feet on the ground...
Click to expand...
You might consider the orbit of Mercury and its precession that that Newtonian gravity gets wrong thus the bolding. Likewise the bending of light by the Sun, etc. that Newtonian gravity gets wrong or cannot even predict.
 
Bjarne said:
Wrong a theory starts with evidence or prediction, and from there is goes step by step,....
Click to expand...
Using mathematics and physics, not gibberish or fantasies, Bjarne.
A delusion that gravity will be simple just because you are in denial of the complexity of gravity does not make fantasy correct.
 
Bjarne said:
I am not a mathematician..
You know matter sucks elastic space.
But I don’t know how much.. Maybe Reality Check also has some experience with space sucking stuff?
If it can be quantified, how much elastic space matter sucks per particle, a mathematical model can easy be made.But even though, you have to prove that space really sucks.
Math is not enough, - so the chose is rather do we want a coherent paradigm, or do we prefer an incoherent one, filled up with rubbish as dark matter, dark energy, (nobody know what is) and denial of plenty observation that doesn’t fits in, such as dark flow, Allais effect etc.,..
It’s rather a chose.
Click to expand...

In spite of not being a mathematician you seem to feel qualified to pronounce judgement on mathematical subjects. How is that?
 
Bjarne said:
If you can tell me the unit for elastic space, you can mathematical unite gravity and the strong force.
Matter and elastic space is woven together, that should be clear to you now
As well as it should be clear that if the elastic space between two pieces of matter will stretch, matter responsible for the pull in space will move.
That is all.
There is no contradiction, except maybe only in your head.
I will give a dame in the math. The world will ignore purely mathematical evidence anyway. The dane HC Ørsted did his discovery without math too, - math first came with Maxwell, and you see there are no contradiction and electricity really doesn’t care.
Click to expand...

Electrical theory, the stuff they use to design generators, is all math
 
Bjarne said:
Let' say that SR will begin to fall apart within 2 years....
Click to expand...
Let us repeat that this a delusion given the enormous evidence for SR - inclosing the fact that the computer you are writing your posts on works (look up quantum electrodynamics) :p!
What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity?

The Michelson-Morley experiments will still be correct and will still show that the aether does not exist.

A delusion about an "elastic universe" being a late 1800 theory is bad, Bjarne. The concept of a spacetime did not come into physics until Minkowski's treatment of SR

More fantasies and gibberish follow.
  • A paranoid 'people are brainwashed' assertion.
  • The delusion that the ISS "must have flown into different clouds of dark matter".
    There is an instrument (AMS) on the ISS looking for signs of a dark matter particle.
  • A vague fantasy about things affecting an unspecified clock.
  • The fantasy that Bjarne has a calculation (not likely given the ignorance of basic math in this thread).
 
Bjarne said:
Because this is one of relative few small bills we have to pay for a nice coherence universe (not conflicting with science itself) and because this part of relativity always is the place sceptics in decades have attached the theory.
Click to expand...
Which is an ignorant reason to stop thinking about the universe and throw away more than a century of scientific progress, Bjarne.
SR does not conflict with science :eek:!
The existence of an aether does conflict with science :eye-poppi.
You stated that "a theory starts with evidence..." but ignorantly think that SR has no evidence and ignore the converse - evidence can rule out a scientific theory such as an aether.

The Michelson-Morley experiments are not evidence for SR. The Michelson-Morley experiments are evidence against an aether. An aether is not part of SR so no skeptic would be stupid enough to attack an imaginary aether part of SR.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom