Evolution of humans solved by Shane Warne

Designated Hitter said:
The evolution of man from ape like creatures is one of the most effective lies told in all of history. No proof exists for this, only speculation as wild as that in the OP.
Click to expand...

Edited by Agatha: 
Please do not make sockpuppet accusations in-thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyway, Dennis Lillee is clearly the missing link and he was under Warne's nose the whole time.
 
Lothian said:
Yeah you tell em.

Apart from fossil evidence, genetic evidence, the molecular clock, evidence from proteins, vestigial and atavistic organs, embryology, biogeography and inter-continental drift, homology, DNA, endogenous retroviruses, pseudogenes, antibiotic and pesticide resistance, artificial selection, experimental evolution, and speciation what evidence has science actually got for evolution?
Click to expand...

"Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true."
 
I will just have one last word on science which have studied all branches deeply for around 40+ years now and is a great subject.

The last project i studied was string theory for around 3 years, mainly because i had inkling something similar could exist from my early twenties as i studied Darwin, QM, and RT in much depth amongst other topics.

My idea of the link in physics was mayb some type of mindons existed as an answer to the dichotomy between QM and RT, or at least other unseen dimensions like the maths in ST begins to suggest, but to me modern ST leaves alot to chance which i hate, such as branes leaking through the right amount of gravitons and dimensions colliding to form new universes seems to much on the verge of fantasy to me.

Also even if this does happen over and over their must still be a start point to it all trace back ad finitum, and an initial start point from nothing so to me much of science has a hard job to predict exact mayb, even our own math's become flawed when dealing with ultimates within nature maybe also.

As for Darwin he was a very clever and observant man, my Mum was similar when alive noticed any slight changes i would never even see. I personally think all did evolve but all species had new start points from nothing, similar to how i believe the laws of physics seem to unfold before our very eyes.
 
Last edited:
MikeG said:
Warne is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he certainly doesn't lack self esteem.
Click to expand...

From my dealing on forums with creationist... I think their biggest problem is to accept that human ARE animals by definition. They cannot accept it, they want themselves/us/human to be "above" because yada yada their faith tell us we inherit the earth or whatever BS.

So biology come to them and tell them welp you evolved from animal and you are by definition, mammals, biologically wise classified in the family as great apes.

That goes directly to the inherit/god gave us earth full square like against a gigantic wall.

They simply cannot accept that. Ever.
 
sootywooty31 said:
I personally think all did evolve but all species had new start points from nothing, similar to how i believe the laws of physics seem to unfold before our very eyes.
Click to expand...

This makes no sense whatsoever, as there would have to be evolutionary stages along the way as each species evolved "from nothing". If you can accept evolution why do you reject the 'common ancestor' idea?
 
sphenisc said:
As it should be, since humans aren't animals by definition.
Click to expand...

A definition written by humans.
mutley.gif
 
Designated Hitter said:
The evolution of man from ape like creatures is one of the most effective lies told in all of history. No proof exists for this, only speculation as wild as that in the OP.
Click to expand...

Then whatever did create us was one lazy SOB, basing us, as they did, on a genetic template that was > 98% chimpanzee. Reeks of laziness and a complete lack of interest in the outcome, to me. Genetic manipulation gone mad. Probably legally actionable, if we could get our hands on the swine who did it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom