Daylightstar
Philosopher
The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017
- Thread starter Bjarne
- Start date
- Status
Daylightstar
Philosopher
There was something with a container (I haven't looked it up), there was also a video of a truck filling that container with sand or something, and then the thing collapsed.
At least, that's what I think I remember.
That could work- would be pretty easy since it looks like he would be limited to just the first 6 or 7 integers...........
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,075
The problem is that the only one that understand me, and the only one that I am sure not have been victim for 100 years massive brainwash, is the devil.
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,075
And was kicked down from his position..
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,075
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,075
And these measurement and speculations during these years was based on the same main thread (that gravity is an elastic property of space) , you soon will realize brings SR down.
It was not waste of time, but brought me to understand something as I already wrote is 50 years ahead our time..
The idea that the cosmological redshift is caused by the expanding universe expands – (only because the electromagnetic spectra apparently seem to do it) – is a profound misinterpretation..
The idea is not built on the scientific method, but rather on speculation. On such basis is our basic understanding of the Universe build..
The real cause of gravitational redshift of the EM spectrum is; – the circumstances that existed when photons was emitted .
In a gravitational field both time and distances are both gradually stretching more and more, the deeper a we get .
This include the ruler, – (as demonstrated by the before mentioned thought experiment).
Any process – including nuclear processes, are proportional different (slower) in a gravitational field.
This for example explains the redshift of quasars, as well why very distance quasars are very redshifted .
PLEASE Read this
http://io9.gizmodo.com/5864931/whats-going-on-with-these-mysterious-ultra-red-galaxies
And you see a similar mystery explained here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmotCQCxQEI
We have turned our understanding of cosmological redshift completely ‘on its head’.
The EM- absorption-spectre is not expanding with time (while a photons travel to the Earth from a distance star), – It is something completely different that happens.
The EM-spectre here on Earth is instead getting gradually more blueshifted with time (compared to before), due to release of space-tension (after Big Bang).
This is what so-called Dark Energy really is.
Thus space is redrawn to a relative tension free stage, and therefore the ruler and time (one second) (as well as the EM Spectre) shrinks (compared to before) so long as so-called Dark Energy (release of gravity tension) dominate..
Deep inside a so-called black hole, light is seen from our perspective only invisible radio waves, this is why these holes are black. - The fast speed is caused by RR periodical forcing orbits to collapse.
So there are NO mysterious hocus pocus going on. GR is the wrong theory for gravity. This is what I discovered.
I could write much much more about this, But I am afraid the 100 years massive brainwash have done so big damage, that it is waste of time.
So I learned a lot by measuring, But the world will first learn many many many many years after I am gone.
Last edited:
Because of being wrong all the time. Demonstrably so.
Roger Ramjets
Philosopher
No, the inside of a black hole doesn't emit any light at all - it emits dark. That is where all the dark energy comes from.
No, there never was a Big Bang. What really happened was that the Universe used to be the same size but much denser, causing light to go slower than it does today. But then black holes started sucking all the matter out, reducing the density and allowing light to go faster.
Pixel42
Schrödinger's cat
The title of this thread predicts the failure of Relativity within 2 years. Does this new prediction mean you are withdrawing the one in the thread title?
It certainly hasn't got off to a good start, what with a major vindication of Relativity happening within 10 days of your making it, so I could certainly understand if you decided to withdraw it.
So which is it? Evidence that you're right and Relativity is wrong within the next two years, or not until long after you're dead?
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
Well that is wrong, of course, but it makes more logical sense than any of the sheer nuttery Bjarne has been espousing!
tsig
a carbon based life-form
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Messages
- 39,049
Reality conspired against him.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Crackpot's m.o.: find a mystery, try to stick your idea to it with your personal belief as glue.
Bjarne, much like others have said, if you want your idea to have any attention (not even traction yet) you need to do the work and publish. However, it is already quite clear that you're entirely incapable of doing any attention requiring meaningful work in this regard.
Your dreams are not important.
no. what is needed is peer-reviewed, acceptable journal published article(s) including details of the work done and the math/experiments involved. Otherwise, like in your own "theorizing," you have nothing. Nor does Arp.
Nor do any other "I know better than Einstein and all those other real scientists because I don't need to know math and perform experiments since I know my stuff is right and theirs can't be since it makes no sense to me and I'not crazy so I must be right and listen to me cause only Me know troof dammit!!!!!"""""
Last edited:
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,075
Very short
SR will fall apart within 2 years, and a modified SR will be necessary..
GR, - the ""curvature of space"" is correct, but the curvature of space is not the cause of gravity.
Objects follow the “”curvature of space””, - but gravity is still a force, because the nature of space is elastic.
The curvature is a misleading expression, it would have been better to use the expression “stretching space”.
Without such modified understanding we will never understand what dark energy is.
It’s funny when the news regarding gravitational waves was announced at Danish television, the speaker / journalist asked a scientist 3 times how gravitational could move if there are no media to move in. He coluld not understand this..
And the explanation was that it is “space time that is moving” - which off course is illogical. Still the speaker really did not understood it, (and I geeus nobody else).
Notice it is the interpretation of the Michelson-Morley experiment that went wrong 100 years ago.
It is correct that the Earth is not colliding with an ether,
The problem was that it was overlooked that the Earth elastic gravitational fields follows the Earth, - therefore you can say the “ether” follows the motion of the Earth, and therefore we shall not expect any collision with light.
SR will fall apart within 2 years, - this mean we are forced to turn back time 100 years, and then realize that there was no reason to reject the elastic ether universe, which was a establish foundation of science at that time..
So you can say that there are many consequences due to the wrong interpretation of the Michelson-Morley experiment..
First we will see this when SR is tested the next few years, - after that we are sooner or later also forced to reintroduce the elastic ether. – Which mean that when we understand this, it is very obvious also to understand that gravity is caused by the elastic property of space – that is woven together with matter.
I think when the Michelson-Morley experiment never was executed and hence the result never known; Einstein would have done it all correct.
The elastic ether should never have been rejected 100 years ago, - this is the place where everything went wrong.
Understanding this leads to a total new universe, where also dark energy is a piece of cake.
But as I wrote collective brainwash 100 years, is the greatest problem right now. It will take a lot of time to pull the weed out of science.
Last edited:
Rincewind
Philosopher
I guess it's good to have the Aether back again!
slyjoe
Illuminator
Vocabulary of physics is math. Where is it?
DuvalHMFIC
Graduate Poster
The sad thing is, he wants to break SR, which is ironic. SR's math is so easy freshman Physics students can (and usually will) do it. It's not hard to understand-and more importantly, it's simply an extension of Newtonian physics. I've said it many times-Newton wasn't "broken", rather added to. And SR and GR will be added too as well-why the focus on "breaking" stuff that has been experimentally proven over and over again?
Ampere's Law wasn't broken-Maxwell added to it
Newton's Laws weren't broken-Einstein added to them
I could continue....
Ampere's Law wasn't broken-Maxwell added to it
Newton's Laws weren't broken-Einstein added to them
I could continue....
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 61,684
Modification of Special Relativity was necessary 100 years ago. That's what General Relativity is.
That doesn't even make sense. A force accelerates mass. That's an essential part of the definition of force. You are claiming something is a force because it's acting in a way other than the actual definition of a force. That is wrong by definition. And that's as wrong as you can ever get.
"Curvature" has a precise mathematical definition, which is correctly applied in GR. It might confuse you, but that's your problem, not GR's problem.
Nope.
Good luck with that. You will fail.
- Status