• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Hillary Clinton is Done

Status
Not open for further replies.
Donal said:
I thought BernieBros were out there attacking all the polls and giving skewed results. At least, that's what Hillary's supporters are telling me.
Click to expand...
No that's just online polls. The regular polls contact a set number of randomly selected people (usually voters).
 
Trakar said:
Definitely part of the damage, the manner of casually exposing an extensive international intelligence network chasing partisan domestic political points,...seems more treasonous and uncaringly homicidal, than the simple "outing of sources" adequately describes.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Use of "sources" is intended to be non-descriptive, I think. Intelligence folks parse their words for as little information revealed as humanly possible.
 
BenBurch said:
You just do not want to acknowledge that I am right. I do understand that. Have a good evening.
Click to expand...

Please, for the purposes of throwing it back at you in the future:

1) do you believe Clinton will be indicted for any of of these supposed lapses in security that you claim are perfectly clear and obvious ? (her server, the top secret emails, etc.)

2) if yes, when ?

3) if no, (briefly) why not ?
 
TheL8Elvis said:
Please, for the purposes of throwing it back at you in the future:

1) do you believe Clinton will be indicted for any of of these supposed lapses in security that you claim are perfectly clear and obvious ? (her server, the top secret emails, etc.)

2) if yes, when ?

3) if no, (briefly) why not ?
Click to expand...

Depends on what they find. The fact of an investigation ought to worry you, however. The last thing anybody wants is this blowing up in October.
 
BenBurch said:
Depends on what they find. The fact of an investigation ought to worry you, however. The last thing anybody wants is this blowing up in October.
Click to expand...

That was a terrible non-answer.

I don't believe any recommendations to charge Clinton will be made, and I don't think it will take until October.
 
I think it is unlikely (~10% chance) that Clinton will be indicted, but I am curious why only "Bernie Bros" are concerned about the investigation. The FBI is independent, so it could recommend an indictment even if Clinton was entirely innocent. Such a recommendation would be fatal to her campaign. Do the Clinton Cheerleaders really think the odds of this are negligible? Even an undeserved recommendation to indict?
 
Beeyon said:
I think it is unlikely (~10% chance) that Clinton will be indicted, but I am curious why only "Bernie Bros" are concerned about the investigation. The FBI is independent, so it could recommend an indictment even if Clinton was entirely innocent. Such a recommendation would be fatal to her campaign. Do the Clinton Cheerleaders really think the odds of this are negligible? Even an undeserved recommendation to indict?
Click to expand...

Why would an independent FBI make an undeserved recommendation to indict? Wouldn't an undeserved recommendation be more indicative of a partisan (faction) in the FBI?
 
BenBurch said:
Unless you are privy to more of the investigation's details than I am, my answer is the only honest one.
Click to expand...

********. It's a cop out.

I'm asking for your opinion, based on the "facts" you have posted in this thread, for example about how you are sure her server was hacked etc. There are admitted top secret emails on her unclassified server.

But the best you can come up with is "depends".

Meh. Cop out.
 
Beeyon said:
I think it is unlikely (~10% chance) that Clinton will be indicted, but I am curious why only "Bernie Bros" are concerned about the investigation. The FBI is independent, so it could recommend an indictment even if Clinton was entirely innocent. Such a recommendation would be fatal to her campaign. Do the Clinton Cheerleaders really think the odds of this are negligible? Even an undeserved recommendation to indict?
Click to expand...

Yes. I hold hope that such a thing would be beyond partisan politics. I have no evidence, just hope that our system more or less works.
 
BenBurch said:
About a criminal investigation I am not privy to? My only opinion is that the fact of such an investigation creates an appearance of either wrongdoing or negligence, neither one good for any candidate.
Click to expand...

Didn't stop you from posting about a server you are not privy to. Enjoy your double standards.

Thanks.
 
BenBurch said:
About a criminal investigation I am not privy to? My only opinion is that the fact of such an investigation creates an appearance of either wrongdoing or negligence, neither one good for any candidate.
Click to expand...
Which is why the Republicans have toiled for so long to create the impression that Clinton is being investigated.

Don't kid yourself. Sanders (who hasn't been attacked yet) barely does better against R candidates than someone the Rs have been attacking for 30 years. If the Rs start thinking Sanders has a shot, they'll come at him with both barrels.
 
BenBurch said:
Oh, the details of the server I am privy to.
Click to expand...

Uhm, we are all privy to the details that have been posted about the server on the Internet, as are we all privy to the details that have been posted about her emails on the Internet.

BenBurch said:
Because I know that class of server and what zero day defects were yet to be revealed in it.
Click to expand...

But you don't know that it was actually exploited. Potential != actual.

BenBurch said:
That's one of the things on my CV.
Click to expand...

News flash, whats on a CV often has little to do with reality.

Please come up with something better than an argument from authority, where we are suppose to believe you are the authority.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom