bagels
Master Poster
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2015
- Messages
- 2,275
Has it ever crossed your mind that Stefanoni and her team were perfectly objective in her findings and it is your theory of a "conspiracy to frame the kids" which is absurd?
There are three facts that by themselves should at least raise questions:
1. Prior to Knox's arrest Stefanoni and her forensic team found zero evidence against the students. None. Their early forensic examination lead them to believe Meredith was attacked by a male using a small penknife. After the police beat a confession out of Knox and declared her a murderer to the entire world, they - luckily for them! - finally managed to "find" evidence against her.
2. Stefanoni suppressed the results of various tests which favored the defense, specifically the TMB blood tests.
3. Stefanoni is to my knowledge the only forensic scientist in the world that has ever found DNA from the victim on a knife, but no blood.
And these are just ancillary facts to the main case.
Bad forensics might get a pass, for better or worse, if you have someone who is obviously guilty. Maybe Ted Bundy's lawyer says this LCN DNA could be contaminated. We all roll our eyes and go whatever. But if you're going to take an obviously innocent girl and throw her in prison for life for a crime clearly committed by the town burglar it's best to have some real evidence.
Last edited:

