You just do not want to acknowledge that I am right. I do understand that. Have a good evening.
I am sure you know this, but don't take it personal. I almost feel sorry for the HiLIARy corps. Time, and history will not be kind!
You just do not want to acknowledge that I am right. I do understand that. Have a good evening.
I am sure you know this, but don't take it personal. I almost feel sorry for the HiLIARy corps. Time, and history will not be kind!
No offense taken whatsoever.
I almost do as well. There was a time I thought Hillary was a pretty cool person. That was 1995.
Since then she has;
Bought a seat in the Senate.
Voted for the PATRIOT act without ever reading it.
Voted for a Trillion-dollar war based on what were transparently lies.
Run a campaign of racial smears against Barack Obama.
Lied about being under sniper fire in Kosovo.
Became the most inept Secretary of State in modern times.
Taken millions in speaker's fees from the very people who caused the Great Recession.
And attempted to pretend to be a Progressive.
You just do not want to acknowledge that I am right. I do understand that. Have a good evening.
As I said before, I knew they were still interviewing people. Now comes confirmation that a law enforcement investigation is ongoing.
Stick a fork in her; http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/fbi-form...hillary-clintons-email-server?cid=sm_fb_msnbc
Baker says the FBI has not, however, “publicly acknowledged the specific focus, scope or potential targets of any such proceedings.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...hillary-clinton-flap-has-much-to-be-proud-of/Steinem essentially told HBO host Bill Maher that young women are throwing their support behind Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) because this is where politically active, progressive young men can be found in a social life-enhancing cluster. Steinem's comments were, to say the least, just a bit dismissive about the sound political reasons that some young women — and to be clear, the numbers indicate that we are talking about young, white women here — prefer Sanders over Clinton.
I'll acknowledge your shameful cherry picking.
Y
Funny how you chose to cut (oh, just in the interests of fair use, I'm sure) the next paragraph.....
The difference between this letter and the original statement is so minute as to have no distinction. I fail to see why anyone at MSNBC would pick up on this as news. The headline should read "FBI Reconfirms That it is Looking Into Use of Hillary's Private Server". Are you hinging everything on the personal pronoun?
Hillary's use. Not sure why Hillary's fans are overlooking that.
Oh wait, yes I do...![]()
IF she did allow material that even she should have known was sensitive on a server that I would testify in court was vulnerable (even without seeing it, given the time and the now-known APTs) then she is indeed in serious legal trouble. Supposedly some of this material was of a nature to reveal sources or methods. There is no more damaging disclosure possible.
Personally, outing an active NOC operation is a little more damaging and serious.
....
The difference between this letter and the original statement is so minute as to have no distinction. I fail to see why anyone at MSNBC would pick up on this as news. The headline should read "FBI Reconfirms That it is Looking Into Use of Hillary's Private Server". Are you hinging everything on the personal pronoun?
Now, in a letter dated February 2 and filed in court Monday, the FBI’s general counsel, James Baker, notes that in public statements and congressional testimony, the FBI “has acknowledged generally that it is working on matters related to former Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server.”
Baker says the FBI has not, however, “publicly acknowledged the specific focus, scope or potential targets of any such proceedings.”
...Can't imagine why anyone is saying her campaign is tanking or that she's shaking up her staff. Sounds more like fake Internet stories people can't help themselves repeating.
MANCHESTER, New Hampshire (CNN) — Hillary Clinton, facing a a tougher than anticipated challenge for the Democratic presidential nomination from Bernie Sanders, is preparing to take a new look at her campaign structure, she said Monday.
Several people close to the campaign, particularly in Bill Clinton’s orbit and among donors, acknowledged discontent within the operation and feel the campaign was too slow to recognize and deal with the threat posed by the Vermont senator.
These concerns were magnified after Clinton eeked out a win in Iowa, carrying the state by less than 1%, and the fact that the former secretary of state is trailing Sanders in polls ahead of Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary. According to a CNN tracking poll released Monday evening, Sanders is leading Clinton in New Hampshire 61% to 35%.
“I have no idea what they’re talking about or who they are talking to,” Clinton said of the Politico report. “We’re going to take stock, but it’s going to be the campaign that I’ve got. I’m very confident in the people that I have. I’m very committed to them, they’re committed to doing the best we can.”...
But, according to people close to the campaign, there is dissatisfaction within the campaign, especially from Bill Clinton and his orbit of advisers and donors.
The former president has been concerned that the campaign has shown “a lack of imagination and hasn’t been forward looking enough,” according to a Democrat who has talked with him...
The problem for Clinton, one Democratic strategist with knowledge of the campaign says, is that, in many ways, the die was cast a couple of years ago. The speeches, this source says, are problematic...
David Axelrod, a CNN contributor and former top adviser to President Barack Obama, suggested that the blame lies at the top.
“When the exact same problems crop up in separate campaigns, with different staff, at what point do the principals say, ‘Hey, maybe it’s US?'” Axelrod tweeted...
Patti Solis Doyle, Clinton’s 2008 campaign manager, was replaced by Maggie Williams, Clinton’s chief of staff when she was first lady, in February 2008 after Obama won contests in Nebraska, Washington state, Louisiana and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Doyle had been with Clinton since she was first lady of Arkansas...
That comes under the heading of "Sources" for me.
Hillary Clinton on shakeup rumors: ‘We’re going to take stock’
Posted 5:12 PM, February 8, 2016, by CNN Wire
http://q13fox.com/2016/02/08/hillary-clinton-on-shakeup-rumors-were-going-to-take-stock/
You could be right.
I don't have a dog in this fight. Back in the "Bush the Chimp" administration it was even better than now. But this is pretty good.
[qimg]http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn180/lirajeanlogan/hillary%20collage_zpsoviconuu.jpg[/qimg]

Asked at a debate last year about her ties to the financial industry, she answered with a non sequitur about women and 9/11. Asked by a reporter last month about releasing the transcripts of her Goldman speeches, she laughed and turned away. Asked at a town hall last week why she accepted $675,000 in speaking fees from the investment bank, she said, “Well, I don't know, that’s what they offered.” Like her transcript defense on Sunday, those are hardly the answers political strategists dream of—but if Clinton had better ones, we’d have heard them by now.
From the most recent polls, January or later: Clinton remains up 29 in S Carolina, up 34 in Minnesota, up 25 in Oklahoma, and up 36 in Florida.
And she's ahead in Dec up 23 in Nevada, and in November up 25 in Massachusetts
Can't imagine why anyone is saying her campaign is tanking or that she's shaking up her staff. Sounds more like fake Internet stories people can't help themselves repeating.
Have to agree on whoever it was above, these women really did not bring voters.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...hillary-clinton-flap-has-much-to-be-proud-of/
You can't insult people to get votes.