Hillary Clinton is Done

Status
Not open for further replies.
Skeptic Ginger said:
A complaint from someone who hasn't changed their story a half dozen times and who complained long before some right wing 'investigators' heard rumors then egged the women on, sometimes with money (funding Paula Jone's lawsuit lottery), sometimes with coercion (in the case of Ken Starr's minions who possibly threatened Broadrrick if she didn't tell the story the way they wanted it told).
Click to expand...

Well that's it, ladies because republicans got involved you'll just have to deal with it. Its good to be a democrat.

Don't get raped by dems if your going to go to republicans for help.:rolleyes:
 
Jrrarglblarg said:
True, other than the dot com bubble and the precursors to the housing industry collapse, yes. Good times.
Click to expand...

NAFTA, Glass-Steagall repeal, Telecommunications Act of 1996, Welfare reform, prison sentencing reform, government downsizing, private contractor replacement of federal programs, the list is both long and extensive with regard to legislation, policy and administrative practice. I like Bill, but he foisted a lot of conservative crap onto the nation and the nation's opposition party, progressives have not been pleased with legislation and practices of the Clintons since Dick Morris made triangulation a fad term.
 
logger said:
Well that's it, ladies because republicans got involved you'll just have to deal with it. Its good to be a democrat.

Don't get raped by dems if your going to go to republicans for help.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...


Once again, you've implied that lack of evidence of sexual assault is, magically, evidence of sexual assault.
 
Fudbucker said:
Didn't you get the memo? Women who accuse Bill are trailer trash lying sluts.

Everyone else, OTOH, should be believed unless proven otherwise.
Click to expand...
Bull.

Women who change their stories multiple times and who are encouraged by the right wing to condemn Bill anyway provide less than credible evidence.

You know, like the woman who made mistakes about the UVA frat house gang rape. No one took her seriously after that. Or the one who said the lacrosse team gang raped her at the party at Duke, also no longer deemed a credible accusation.

So why compare the Clinton accusers to Cosby's when they have nothing in common instead of comparing the women to Crystal Magnum or Jackie, the University of Virginia freshman?
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Bull.

Women who change their stories multiple times and who are encouraged by the right wing to condemn Bill anyway provide less than credible evidence.

You know, like the woman who made mistakes about the UVA frat house gang rape. No one took her seriously after that. Or the one who said the lacrosse team gang raped her at the party at Duke, also no longer deemed a credible accusation.

So why compare the Clinton accusers to Cosby's when they have nothing in common instead of comparing the women to Crystal Magnum or Jackie, the University of Virginia freshman?
Click to expand...

Just stop already. Bill is a lying scumbag who got caught and it had nothing to do with some "vast right wing conspiracy". It had everything to do with a certain dress one of his victims held on to.

Don't you support women's rights? Do you think perverted creeps limit themselves to one victim? Do you think that cigar is the only toy Bill ever shoved inside a woman's *****? Don't you believe accusers "deserve to be believed"?

Your support of a sexual predator and smearing of his accusers is disgusting.
 
Fudbucker said:
Just stop already. Bill is a lying scumbag who got caught and it had nothing to do with some "vast right wing conspiracy". It had everything to do with a certain dress one of his victims held on to.

Don't you support women's rights? Do you think perverted creeps limit themselves to one victim? Do you think that cigar is the only toy Bill ever shoved inside a woman's *****? Don't you believe accusers "deserve to be believed"?

Your support of a sexual predator and smearing of his accusers is disgusting.
Click to expand...
Bill likes the ladies and was unfaithful in his marriage. I hear JFK was as well.

To go from there to rapist is not an evidence based stretch. Unless of course you want it to be true and you aren't looking at the evidence objectively.


There was not a consistent Crosbyesque pattern. There were no accusations from women who didn't change their stories multiple times.
 
Last edited:
logger said:
Joe diGenova is a lawyer who has his own practice with his wife Victoria Toensing. He is a private individual not a government official. He is free to have an opinion.
Click to expand...
I see you've come round to the opinion he was just making things up and was not releasing confidential information he had no legal right to do so.
 
Fudbucker said:
Just stop already. Bill is a lying scumbag who got caught and it had nothing to do with some "vast right wing conspiracy". It had everything to do with a certain dress one of his victims held on to.

Don't you support women's rights? Do you think perverted creeps limit themselves to one victim? Do you think that cigar is the only toy Bill ever shoved inside a woman's *****? Don't you believe accusers "deserve to be believed"?

Your support of a sexual predator and smearing of his accusers is disgusting.
Click to expand...
You must be getting your people confused, the lady with the stained dress was not sexually assaulted and has never claimed she was.
 
This thread is one of the saddest I have seen in my many years here!
The sexual predator defended, and his power hungry wife, are no better than some scumbag teacher who molested boys, or girls! Yes...they wanted to do it!


Done with this! How do you sleep at night?
Vote HRC, you deserve her!
 
Childlike Empress said:
"Bob" bless you, Trakar. I've said it here many years ago, and many times, but will say it again: the future of this planet is at the hands of the American people.

And now we are at the point where the pendulum is standing above all of our heads, waiting. Go for nothing but excellency. Thanks.
Click to expand...
I'm surprised to see you supporting the Sanders/Clinton/Cheney imperialist war machine, especially when there is an actual progressive, anti-war candidate running for POTUS -- Jill Stein. :rolleyes:
 
Bernie Sanders on Friday decried former President Bill Clinton’s affair with then-White House intern Monica Lewinsky as “totally disgraceful and unacceptable” but stressed that he is running a campaign against Hillary Clinton, not her husband.

“Look, Hillary Clinton is not Bill Clinton. What Bill Clinton did, I think we can all acknowledge, was totally, totally, totally disgraceful and unacceptable,” the Vermont senator and Democratic presidential candidate told a crowd at an Iowa town hall. “But I am running against Hillary Clinton. I’m not running against Bill Clinton.”

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/bernie-sanders-bill-clinton-unacceptable-217522#ixzz3wm78tfL3

Big Dog's* rollout is not going very well...


*AKA Slick Willy, AKA Bill Clinton
 
Meadmaker said:
But...who cares?

No, seriously, who cares? I don't care. I don't think most people care. I know 20 years ago the Republicans made fools of themselves trying to get a lot of people to care, but, when it was all said and done, we still didn't care. The only thing they accomplished was to ensure that for generations to come, Junior High School government teachers would say, as if with one voice, "Let's talk about Andrew Johnson."

Your team really need to back off on the personal life. It just isn't significant.
Click to expand...
You'll notice, however, the pull of the Clintonian bug zapper even still remains strong. It'll obviously get you every time, but moths being moths...
 
Last edited:
Dog Town said:
This thread is one of the saddest I have seen in my many years here!
The sexual predator defended, and his power hungry wife, are no better than some scumbag teacher who molested boys, or girls! Yes...they wanted to do it!


Done with this! How do you sleep at night?
Vote HRC, you deserve her!
Click to expand...

It would nice if the other party would give me a viable alternative to HRC. Alas I'm becoming more and more convinced that I will be faced with a choice between HRC and that creepy Dominionist Cruz or Donald friggen Trump. Seriously? Donald Trump?

ugh!
 
twinstead said:
It would nice if the other party would give me a viable alternative to HRC. Alas I'm becoming more and more convinced that I will be faced with a choice between HRC and that creepy Dominionist Cruz or Donald friggen Trump. Seriously? Donald Trump?

ugh!
Click to expand...

Feel the Bern!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom