RE: clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ziggurat said:
Yes, she's under-qualified. Being a lawyer isn't really impressive. Everything else on that list is simply the result of her having married well. She has no actual skills besides putting up with Bill's infidelity, and no real accomplishments in any of the positions she has held.
Click to expand...
As opposed to the GOP President that you voted no doubt voted for who simply had the good fortune of being the son of a former President.

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Of course. And which ignorant bozo on the GOP ticket are you planning to vote for?
Click to expand...

You can't actually argue for Hillary having any accomplishments, so you try to change the subject. Cute, but I'm not interested in playing your game. If you want to discuss Republican candidates, choose from one of the many threads on that topic.
 
Tony Stark said:
Are you denying that you voted for him?
Click to expand...

I'm not telling you who I voted for, because it's not relevant. Nor do you actually know who I voted for. I know that's a hard concept for you to wrap your little head around, since you can't view any issue except through a partisan lense, but nothing I said depends upon who I voted for.
 
Ziggurat said:
I'm not telling you who I voted for, because it's not relevant. Nor do you actually know who I voted for. I know that's a hard concept for you to wrap your little head around, since you can't view any issue except through a partisan lense, but nothing I said depends upon who I voted for.
Click to expand...
If you voted for Bush, your complaints about Hillary not being qualified are blatantly hypocritical and motivated by partisanship. Clearly why refuse to so.
 
Tony Stark said:
If you voted for Bush, your complaints about Hillary not being qualified are blatantly hypocritical and motivated by partisanship. Clearly why refuse to so.
Click to expand...

You know far less than you think you do, about everything.

I have a habit of refusing to answer personal questions which I don't think should be relevant, regardless of whether that answer would be useful in refuting some irrelevant accusation. This is a matter of principle for me: I refuse to feed your hunger for irrelevant personal information about me. I'm funny that way. I won't answer who I voted for because I think it doesn't matter. Just as I refused to answer what my religion was when the worm Ion accused me of being Jewish many moons ago.

And even as a matter of logic, it doesn't withstand elementary scrutiny (not that you would know). But one can consider a candidate unqualified but still choose to vote for them based on reasons other than one's assessment of their qualifications. For example, one might conclude that despite a lack of qualifications, one candidate might still be the least bad available option.

There are two obvious implications to such a simple idea, though both the idea and its implications have eluded you. The first is that your criticism of me is baseless regardless of how I voted. The second is that it's possible to realize that Hillary is unqualified and still choose to vote for her. Perhaps this realization will free you to acknowledge the obvious: she has no qualifications. You've already abandoned any pretense of trying to argue to the contrary, you might as well just admit it now.
 
DavidJames said:
Seems by your standards, the only qualification for president is to have been a president.
Click to expand...
I linked back to the reason I have a problem with Clinton's personal email use in the same post (that you left out), and it was in fact a response to you quite some time ago. You can assume what you want without ever reading the argument, or you can respond the argument - your choice. But Skeptic's response was by definition an appeal to authority and your point quite frankly says little to address the supporting argument that was made to back my statement up - nor have your previous rebuttals ever done so.
 
Last edited:
Hillary "surprised" that one of her staff was using personal email

In an email that demonstrates that depths of her hypocrisy, Hillary Clinton writes that she is "surprised" that one of her State Department staffers is using a personal email to discuss State Business about Libya.

Of course, hillary was writing from her own personal email account run off the cowboy server next to Bill's rumpus room.

You cannot make this stuff up...

https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_Jan7thWeb/08634-JAN7-FC/DOC_0C05792033/C05792033.pdf
 
Ziggurat said:
You can't actually argue for Hillary having any accomplishments, so you try to change the subject. Cute, but I'm not interested in playing your game. If you want to discuss Republican candidates, choose from one of the many threads on that topic.
Click to expand...
What utter nonsense. The right wing constantly tries to dismiss Clinton's exceptional resumé. It's like the other mindless claims, Obama is the worst ever, the ACA is a disaster, yadda yadda.

You got nothing, Zig, except baseless hyperbole.
 
Leftus said:
They all have been *marked* classified after the fact. The redacted information in the emails were always classified and were classified on the date it was created. You can tell this by looking at the reasons for redaction and the dates they become declassified. [snip]
Click to expand...
:words:

This has been addressed again and again in this thread. The right wing rants and raves and posts laws supposedly broken and the fact there are some gray areas. And yet, there are no charges made.

Colin Powell used private email and no one cared.

This is just more contrived outrage over nothing.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
What utter nonsense. The right wing constantly tries to dismiss Clinton's exceptional resumé. It's like the other mindless claims, Obama is the worst ever, the ACA is a disaster, yadda yadda.

You got nothing, Zig, except baseless hyperbole.
Click to expand...

Her resume is indeed exceptional: she married a political giant, and rode his coattails to some quite prestigious positions.

But she never actually accomplished anything of note while occupying those positions. You have not once even tried to argue for an actual accomplishment other than getting such positions.
 
Ziggurat said:
Her resume is indeed exceptional: she married a political giant, and rode his coattails to some quite prestigious positions.

But she never actually accomplished anything of note while occupying those positions. You have not once even tried to argue for an actual accomplishment other than getting such positions.
Click to expand...

Your failure to look at, recognize, admit, or be honest about Clinton's accomplishments is not my failure to post citations and describe those accomplishments.
 
"If they can't, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure."

Faced with a problem sending a document over the secure system, Hillary instructs her underling to:

"If they can't, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure."

and thereby to intentionally skirt the State Department's secure communication system.

https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_Jan7thWeb/08635C6-8/DOC_0C05787519/C05787519.pdf

Remember when Hillary said no classified info had been sent? She lied.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Your failure to look at, recognize, admit, or be honest about Clinton's accomplishments is not my failure to post citations and describe those accomplishments.
Click to expand...
You're trying to get Republicans, who have steadfastly refused to engage in any discussion regarding the viability of candidates from their own side of the political spectrum to acknowledge the accomplishments of a Democrat.

Why would anyone do that? Does it feel good when you stop? ;)
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Your failure to look at, recognize, admit, or be honest about Clinton's accomplishments is not my failure to post citations and describe those accomplishments.
Click to expand...

What accomplishments? I keep asking for them, and you can never name them.

Nobody can. Because they don't exist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom