GMOs: This is World War III- It Just Isn't Labeled

[Slowvehicle]

A syllable of Vikings.
Not the manliest of collective nouns, is it?

I find this offensive, sirrah!

Action lexicography is a thing!

I challenge you to a match game of Bleeks to remove the stain on your honor.

For Science!

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

Who Are the Knights of Malta?

Allow me to enlighten you on the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, aka The Knights of Malta. They are the Militia of the Pope, his army. They obviously stem from the Vatican and have their roots in Catholicism. Now, this is at their origin, which goes back centuries. However, they have morphed from that state to now allow a protestant wing which is under the tutelage of Queen Elizabeth of England. The Queen wields much more power than most people think. As I have said before, she is herself a Knight of Malta, so she is backed by the Vatican. This is a learning curve for many people, because she is also in charge of the Anglican Church. But there she is with her Knight of Malta badge, therefore stating incontrovertibly that she is a Knight of Malta. So, you should be able to see from this that the Crown of England is tied inextricably to the Vatican Nation and is under their control. Yes, the Vatican is a nation, a country in and of itself. This is important to understand so that you can see their agenda. Queen Elizabeth rules the American wing of the Knights of Malta. It is this American wing with which we are here concerned.


The Knights of Malta and 9/11

Here is a brief list of the Knights of Malta involved in the 9/11 coup d'état:
David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush, Rudy Giuliani, L. Paul Bremer, Governor George Pataki, Michael Bloomberg, George Tenet, and Michael Chertoff. Countless other Knights of Malta were involved in the strike, as well as the American CIA, itself a product of the Knights of Malta.

I give credit to these men in my film, PAPAMUNDI and the 9/11 Mechanism, and in my many blogs and videos on the subject of 9/11. Their involvement is extremely obvious, and numerous patriots are beginning to see this fact and to work against this outside threat to the U. S. A patriot, here defined, is not a “True Believer” of the obvious government lie, but rather someone who notices that our country has been taken over and is involved in doing something about it. An American Patriot is one who defends the U. S. Constitution. It is not about mindless flag waving and making genocidal war. There will now be a revival of True Patriotism in America. (Hint: The Patriot Act is the least patriotic thing that ever happened to the U. S., and its formation was an intensional outgrowth of the 9/11 attacks.)


Vatican Nationals in the U. S. Government

Knights of Malta are traitors to this country. This is because of one simple fact: these people have sworn allegiance to the Pope and to the Vatican and to none other, including the U. S. This makes them Vatican Nationals. Since the Vatican is a nation, its countrymen must bear the moniker “nationals” just as a French person in the U. S. would be referred to as a French national. So “Vatican National” is my term for one who is of the country of the Vatican in terms of their avowed allegiance. Catholics must now decide whether or not they are Vatican Nationals, essentially making a choice of the country to which they owe allegiance. Many Catholics are now interested in distancing themselves from the evil Vatican hierarchy. Rampant pedophilia is not the only reason.

In reality, and by their own admission, the Vatican is not a religion, again, it is a country. It’s the kind of thing where people have to choose. You are either a religious body or a political body. They have chosen to be a political body, so that is what they are—even though people have been generally slow on the uptake about this. It comes into play when they, as a country, attack the U. S. as they did on 9/11. It changes things so that now The Vatican is an enemy nation. The Knights of Malta are it's countrymen as well as Opus Dei and a number of other orders of Papal Knights or operatives. This is why I have said that a Knight of Malta is not an American. They have sworn allegiance to another country and are therefore nationals of that country. And when a Vatican National becomes the U. S. President, as in the cases of Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush and his son, George W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, we have a situation of a conflict of interest, to put it mildly.

When you see the Knights of Malta you will now start to think of them as Vatican Nationals. It will help jar your reasoning if you imagine French or German nationals in positions of power in our government. Wouldn’t you notice that? Would the American people allow it? What if they attacked us, what would you do? Even though these Vatican Nationals don't speak with any accent, their loyalty is to another nation, and they are sworn to undermine the power of the U. S. We who have awakened, see this group very clearly now. We are watching its members because we know them to be terrorists. Where and how will they strike again? It is only a matter of time.


Mindless and Apathetic Sellout

So now, to you who made this inane comment. It may all seem quite exciting to you in your puerile heart of hearts to joke about these killers. You imagine that you are being quite funny talking about becoming a member of the Knights of Malta. That would align you with the people who did 9/11. Since these are the people who slaughtered 343 New York City firefighters and thousands more, you are dancing on their graves. This makes you either a mental child or a traitor depending on your level of competency. But, perhaps that is the flavor of this forum. Perhaps the “international” aspect is really just saying globalist and unpatriotic, and I have wandered into a den of thieves.

Let me break it down for you again in words of one syllable. If you were to actually join the Knights of Malta then you would become a traitor to your nation by definition. That may sound like fun to the psychological infant, or perhaps you like their system of fascism better than the U. S. constitutional democracy. It is your right to choose. But I do hope for all our sakes that you then leave these shores and go stay closer to those you love better.

Thanks to any True Patriots who exist on this site,
Peter Valentino

Citation please

 

[Lukraak_Sisser]

The examples you give are of relationships that no longer exist, but did exist when the religion and the buildings were together. So that's a fail. The Vatican is owned by the Catholic Church. Why would you pretend otherwise?

I'm not the one claiming a church = religion inside of it, that was you, I was merely pointing out there are a lot of exceptions

As for claiming the Vatican is owned by the Catholic Church yet international politics is not as simple as you seem to think this case is.

Vatican city is an independent monarchy, with the pope as monarch. Technically therefore Vatican City belongs to whoever is pope at the time.

While practically there may be no difference at the moment, in theory the pope could sell the whole of the country to Italy regardless of what the rest of the Catholic church feels about it.

The whole history of the church also being a landlord is quite fascinating really. The last remnant of the old Prince Bishops in Europe.

 

[vtbub]

Slowvehicle wins the thread.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I'm not the one claiming a church = religion inside of it, that was you, I was merely pointing out there are a lot of exceptions

As for claiming the Vatican is owned by the Catholic Church yet international politics is not as simple as you seem to think this case is.

Vatican city is an independent monarchy, with the pope as monarch. Technically therefore Vatican City belongs to whoever is pope at the time.

While practically there may be no difference at the moment, in theory the pope could sell the whole of the country to Italy regardless of what the rest of the Catholic church feels about it.

The whole history of the church also being a landlord is quite fascinating really. The last remnant of the old Prince Bishops in Europe.

Like I said, the Vatican belongs to the Catholic Church. Sorry to be a quibble-killer.

 

[Lukraak_Sisser]

Like I said, the Vatican belongs to the Catholic Church. Sorry to be a quibble-killer.

In everything but the actual legal sense, yes.
Legally, no.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

In everything but the actual legal sense, yes.
Legally, no.

 

[Hans]

I wonder if the Vatican and the KoM snatched Papa and put him into the lower vaults of the Vatican Library?

 

[abaddon]

I wonder if the Vatican and the KoM snatched Papa and put him into the lower vaults of the Vatican Library?

I wonder why papamundi has bailed yet again.

 

[Notconvinced]

http://www.oilgeopolitics.net/GMO/Iraq_and_seeds_of_democracy/iraq_and_seeds_of_democracy.HTM

From the link above, Iraq was turned into a vassal state for Monsanto and others.

 

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Sir, I didn't state that the Queen of England is a Catholic. She is not. Nor are several thousands of members of the American Knights of Malta, including Henry Kissinger, who is apparently Jewish. SMOM membership doesn't require Catholicism, just allegiance to the Pope. It's different. With a modicum of research you would know this, but only if you cared. Since people say that those who don't understand history are doomed to repeat it, I dig deeper than many of the people on this forum because I find the repetition boring and therefore seek to understand and spread the actual truth.

Sorry, my friend, I know history much better than you. History is what actually happened. It is not just a perceptual reality, but an actuality. If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to see it, did it actually fall or does it have to do with how somebody can spin it? It fell, kids.

They say that history is written by the victors. Lies about history may be written by them, but that is not actual history. Accepted American history, according to the skewed Wikipedia, says that Sirhan Sirhan killed Bobby Kennedy. Yet, coroner Thomas Noguchi stated that Bobby died from a gunshot wound in the back of the head. That is history. The other story is just fluff someone manufactured to entertain and to pick the pockets of the people in the cheap seats. Perhaps yourself...

Thank You,
Peter Valentino

 

[MileHighMadness]

As we go deeper and deeper down the rabbit hole.

 

[papamundi]

Not everybody is winning...Indian children are dying from GMOs

Despite big science, big pharma and big food trying to kill us, humans live longer and die less of illness now than at any other time in history. Seems to me we're winning this war.

Sir, I recommend broadening your perspective.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgllSrj5TXs

Please see this simple video talking about the GMO situation in India and how they are making kids sick--killing defenseless human beings. Unfortunately, Monsanto is spreading its poison food to other countries where it is bringing death. This is global experimentation on the less fortunate.

It is very easy to claim that advances in health are ubiquitous. Better to be real about things and see that there are major problems in our nation's food supply and with the subsidies that skew our intake to unhealthy choices.

See this piece on ABC by the late great Peter Jennings. He doesn't even get into GMOs and he declares that there are programs by the US government that endanger our health and that of our children.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZaCKBLTQrc&list=PLL2lIa1JdL_riyFHDN2CyNcZZyPk_5JjP

Ignorance of these realities may be blissful for some...but in the final analysis, perhaps caring for humanity is a stronger position to take.

GMOs must end before they destroy our organic crops, our bees and butterflies...and our children.

Thanks,
Peter Valentino

 

[papamundi]

OK, sorry. I will be nicer to the people who universally condemn the obvious truth.

Love,
Peter Valentino

 

[abaddon]

Sir, I recommend broadening your perspective.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgllSrj5TXs

Please see this simple video talking about the GMO situation in India and how they are making kids sick--killing defenseless human beings. Unfortunately, Monsanto is spreading its poison food to other countries where it is bringing death. This is global experimentation on the less fortunate.

It is very easy to claim that advances in health are ubiquitous. Better to be real about things and see that there are major problems in our nation's food supply and with the subsidies that skew our intake to unhealthy choices.

See this piece on ABC by the late great Peter Jennings. He doesn't even get into GMOs and he declares that there are programs by the US government that endanger our health and that of our children.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZaCKBLTQrc&list=PLL2lIa1JdL_riyFHDN2CyNcZZyPk_5JjP

Ignorance of these realities may be blissful for some...but in the final analysis, perhaps caring for humanity is a stronger position to take.

GMOs must end before they destroy our organic crops, our bees and butterflies...and our children.

Thanks,
Peter Valentino

And you, sir, should learn something. Everything you eat is a GMO. Those "organic" products you eat? All GMOs. And worse, those "organic" foods you eat cost more for no reason whatsoever. And worse, those "organic" foods you eat cause more environmental pollution to boot. And worse, those "organic" foods you eat are incapable of supporting the current human population.

 

[papamundi]

Reality?

The environment of replicable results and confirmable claims.


Another version, reality is what remains when you cease believing.

Love is then not part of your "Reality" since it conforms to none of the above definitions.

Dreams don't either.

Nor feelings of any kind, come to think of it.

Gee, I guess this view of Reality is empty indeed...

Have fun with it, though
Peter Valentino

 

[abaddon]

Love is then not part of your "Reality" since it conforms to none of the above definitions.

That would be an evolved biological function.

Dreams don't either.

Evolved biological function again, I'm afraid.

Nor feelings of any kind, come to think of it.

Still evolved biological functions.

Gee, I guess this view of Reality is empty indeed...

Nope. It's full of wonder and excitement.

Have fun with it, though
Peter Valentino

I intend to.

 

[papamundi]

All Apologies

Yes.

His premise and conclusions were wrong then, and have not improved with age.

I am certain that I now have a reputation as a firebrand meanie. In order to explain my behavior, let me just say that I have been shocked at the little support that I have received from the people on this forum. I also see that in my other "world" I have a significant number of people who do ascribe to my findings.

However, I do find that people are often unable to connect the dots that I see. I should say that they don't even see the dots in the first place, let alone have the ability to connect them.

People retort, "How can you draw these ridiculous conclusions?" To me, I am extremely surprised that other people are not able to look into things with my level of perspicacity. I am certain it is the result of a number of variables, not the least of which would be my parenting and the fact that I've been an artist my entire life.

But even beyond that, I would say that it's the result of the fact that I have turned off the television and have generally not watched it for well over a decade. Yes, I don't even have basic cable. I'm sure this admission will intensify people's thought that I am not living in "Reality."

I notice that what the people of this forum believe and defend is generally what is coming through their television sets. This is probably the greatest difference between us.

Reality will not be televised. You may have to look further...
Peter Valentino

 

[marplots]

However, I do find that people are often unable to connect the dots that I see. I should say that they don't even see the dots in the first place, let alone have the ability to connect them.

People retort, "How can you draw these ridiculous conclusions?" To me, I am extremely surprised that other people are not able to look into things with my level of perspicacity. I am certain it is the result of a number of variables, not the least of which would be my parenting and the fact that I've been an artist my entire life.

It is the burden of your genius.
"Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." -- Schopenhauer

 

[abaddon]

I am certain that I now have a reputation as a firebrand meanie.

Nope. That is not the reputation you have acquired. You don't want to know the reputation you have acquired.

In order to explain my behavior, let me just say that I have been shocked at the little support that I have received from the people on this forum.

Nope. You have been given exactly the correct level of support your notions deserve. None.

I also see that in my other "world" I have a significant number of people who do ascribe to my findings.

You have no "findings" and your other fantasy worlds are irrelevant as are their imaginary denizens.

However, I do find that people are often unable to connect the dots that I see. I should say that they don't even see the dots in the first place, let alone have the ability to connect them.

Ironic, given that you cannot even reliably identify a dot.

People retort, "How can you draw these ridiculous conclusions?"

People in general are not that stupid.

To me, I am extremely surprised that other people are not able to look into things with my level of perspicacity. I am certain it is the result of a number of variables, not the least of which would be my parenting and the fact that I've been an artist my entire life.

Sorry, you mean you have been a bum all your life? What exactly do you mean here?

But even beyond that, I would say that it's the result of the fact that I have turned off the television and have generally not watched it for well over a decade. Yes, I don't even have basic cable. I'm sure this admission will intensify people's thought that I am not living in "Reality."

I don't even own a television, nor have I done for years. Where does that leave us?

I notice that what the people of this forum believe and defend is generally what is coming through their television sets. This is probably the greatest difference between us.

Can't speak for others, but I don't possess such a device. I ask again, where does that leave us?

Reality will not be televised. You may have to look further...
Peter Valentino

Couldn't venture an opinion on that since I do not own such a device. Once again, where does that leave us?