• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Satan's Powers and Abilities

The references I know of in the Bible:

He appeared to Jesus in the dessert to tempt him.
He hangs out in a lake of fire at the end of the world in Revelations.
He makes a bet with God in Job, but God does the dirty work of killing Job's family and kine.

No worldly influence there.

Other references:
The Serpent in the Garden of Eden is equated with Satan, though the Bible calls it The Serpent. In the book of Wisdom, an apocryphal book found in the Catholic but not Protestant Bible, the equation is made.
In Isaiah, the morning star is presented as a fake God, who is replaced by a much more powerful sun. It represents a king of that day, but is often said to represent Satan.
The serpent wasn't originally equated with Satan, and no such interpretation is suggested in Genesis.

He appeared to Jesus in the dessert to tempt him? Oh, go on, have another helping.

But you've missed out my favourite reference to Satan. The Bible can't make up its mind whether a particular revolting monstrosity was performed by Satan or YHWH. Well, these guys weren't easy to tell apart, as we will see.

2 Samuel 24 Again the anger of the Lord burned against Israel, and he incited David against them, saying, “Go and take a census of Israel and Judah.”​
Goddidit. Fine. But what's this?
1 Chronicles 21 Satan rose up against Israel and incited David to take a census of Israel.​
Let's look at the God version, and decide why it's hard to tell them apart.
2 Sam 24:15 So the Lord sent a plague on Israel from that morning until the end of the time designated, and seventy thousand of the people from Dan to Beersheba died. 16 When the angel stretched out his hand to destroy Jerusalem, the Lord relented concerning the disaster and said to the angel who was afflicting the people, “Enough! Withdraw your hand.” The angel of the Lord was then at the threshing floor of Araunah the Jebusite. 17 When David saw the angel who was striking down the people, he said to the Lord, “I have sinned; I, the shepherd, have done wrong. These are but sheep. What have they done? Let your hand fall on me and my family.”​
David, mass murderer that he was, is still able to give God useful lessons in morality!
 
Last edited:
This is one of my favorite topics because it illustrates how broad the gap between the actual religious fables and the, for lack of a better term, pop culture religion that exists for the masses.

As noted Satan is what I've always called the Boba Fett of the Bible. Barely in the original works and doesn't do a whole lot to effect the story arc, but for some reason he's widely popular and amazingly influential with the fandom.

Roughly "Satan" as he is considered in modern days is a loose conglomerations of a half dozen or so Biblical characters and whole crap ton of expanded universe stuff during the Middle Ages.

Satan, the Devil, Lucifer, the Beast in Revelations, and the Serpent in the Garden of Eden and a few other variations on ancient words that translated into "adversary" or "enemy" or similar weren't originally all written as the same character, they just all got retconned into an overaching big bad to give the Bible a more solid narrative. Really out of all the times this "character" supposed to show up in the Bible only Satan from the story of Job and Satan tempting Jesus in the desert really read like the same being. And in both those instances he sorta comes across as working with/for God in some sort of cosmic Good Cop / Bad Cop routine to test some highly pious person's faith, not in the arch-nemesis role. In face in every case, even if we treat all these various characters as a single entity, the stories all work better if we assume Satan and God are working together, not in an adversarial role.

Nothing in the actual canonical Bible really sells the modern image of Satan as this all powerful arch enemy of God who's the root of all evil. He just comes across more as a snarky underling in charge of God's Q.A. department.

The meat and potatoes of the modern image of Satan owes practically everything to Dante, Milton, Faust and a bunch of imagery and iconography "borrowed" from other religions.
 
Last edited:
No, his greatest trick was taking the name Jehovah and convincing us that he is God.

No need for Kryptonite. A few iron chariots will do the trick.

Yet more proof that 'God' isn't who he says he is...


If a devil wanted to cause strife and mayhem and schisms and atrocities between humans throughout the ages I doubt he could have done any better than the Buybull.

Consider this funny story of what may have occurred on a sleepy afternoon eons ago:

The scene: God and Satan are discussing the design of humans on a dull afternoon.

G: I am going to create humans and give them wisdom and goodness and they will love me.

S: So you are going to make them worship you?

G: No...that defeats the purpose... They will do it out of reverence to me.

S: Ah....but that is no good either. They can't help but revere you if they know you and see you.

G: Yeah....isn't that the point?

S: Not really.... that doesn't prove anything if they love you just because you do things for them and they can see you as a guardian and protector. They would be morons if they don't and YOU cannot create morons can you?

G: No... I cannot create morons...you are right. But Hmmmmm....you are right. How can I test that they would love me for me and not for the things I do for them?

S: If I may suggest something?

G: Well....go ahead!

S: I think that you should NEVER EVER show yourself to them. If before they go extinct they have come to conclude that you are THE GOD then that shows they were sufficiently clever and a testament to your creative wisdom.

G: OK…. I will just help them ANONYMOUSLY.

S: Oh no....that won't do. If you help them that would be a dead give away...no?

G: Ok...then I will just make sure no calamities would ever befall them.

S: Oh...no that won't do either…. What kind of test is that? If nothing bad happens despite which they loved you then what kind of character test is that?

G: Hmmm....ok... I will just let them be on their own and if they grow to love me then we know they loved me for me and not just because I helped them out.

S: But that is not enough.

G: What now....what else do you want me to do.

S: Well....One has a choice only if one has things to choose from. If there are no other temptations how can we know that they chose at all? We need to tempt them away from you and if they resist then we know how clever they are.

G: I don't like this. After all I love them and you now have me rain hell on them and not help them and then you want me to also DECEIVE them too?

S: Well....it is up to you....but if you really want to be sure!

G: What do you propose then?

S: Here are my rules for the bet:
  • You leave them all alone. You never show yourself or manifest any sign or indication of your existence.
  • They are to be left to fend for themselves against all natural disasters and diseases and so forth.
  • Every now and then, I will make sure to pretend to be some God and try to convince man to worship me as if I am the real god. I will also make sure that I do that many times in various places at the same time.
  • Let’s say I do that for 10 million years.
  • At the end of that time, if there are any humans who are not fooled by the myriad of godly disguises and are in fact not worshiping any of these disguises then YOU win.
  • I get to keep the souls of the ones that fall for my shams. YOU get the ATHEISTS.
G: Even the atheists that are killers and rapists? What about the theists that are good and their only fault is that they fell for the ruses?

S: Well….what do you want?

G: Any people who harm other people and have made any others miserable you get whether they fell for your ruses or not. Any ones that have been kind and never intentionally or directly harmed anyone I get whether they fell for your ruses or not.

S: That is not fair. I should get all the ones that worshiped me in any guise regardless. After all I can make a case that by worshiping my hoaxes they wasted valuable time that they could have better devoted to other tasks that could have benefited humanity more.

G: Look…. I don’t like you taking ANY souls. What are you going to do with them anyway… No…. my decision is final. I agree to all your proposals EXCEPT let’s just have it so that all people who die just stay that way….except for the ones that do bad stuff….them… you get to torture for a million year and then extinguish.

S: So even the good ones just die?

G: Yes…all just die but for the bad ones whom you get for a million years and then you extinguish them and we are done.

S: So….let’s be clear about the terms:
  • You never ever interfere or show your face.
  • I get to do what I want.
  • If by the end of 10 million years there are good atheists….you win….otherwise you lose.
G: OK….you are on……

S: How many matches do you want to play?​
 
Satan seems to lurk constantly but as I and others here recall, I don't think he ever manages to get his figurative hands on anything but people's imagination. He gets to lead people astray and then they end up taking responsibility. He acts on minds rather than the world, and even, in Job, gets God to do his dirty work for him. God can't seem to get people to do anything without clobbering them. But where God smites, Satan just incites. The big sister of the universe, he always manages it so someone else takes the rap.
 
According to the bible can Satan influence our physical world or can he/she only tempt and influence humans?
IOW, can Satan give cancer to babies and other such atrocities?

A "Satan" is really more of a biblical stock character. A demon who shows up to screw with humans, sometimes working with God. Probably Zoroastrian dualism had some influence and Satan gradually turns into more of a cosmic force - yet still in the Gospels we see him running errands for God.


Let's immerse ourselves in the world of the Buybull where magic and the supernatural are ubiquitous and devils and demonic possessions are common everyday occurrences.

The ancients used to believe (and shamefully and pathetically some people still do even in the 21st century) that you can have someone POSSESSED by a demon or spirit by HEXING their food or drink (see here).

Christians did and still do believe in demonic, satanic and spirit possessions (e.g. Luke 8:27-36, Matthew 4:24, Mark 1:32)

We are also told that Jesus had full control over demons and devils and they knew him very well
Mark 1:34 And he healed many that were sick of divers diseases, and cast out many devils; and suffered not the devils to speak, because they knew him.​


Carrying on with this Buybullical "logic" one can only conclude that

Jesus is the DEVIL
Or at least the Devil works for or in cahoots with Jesus

Read CAREFULLY John 13:21-30 (see below) as to what transpired between Jesus and Judas during the last supper night before Judas went and guided the Sanhedrin to Jesus' whereabouts in the garden of Gethsemane (or was it Mount of Olives).

As detailed in the verses you would notice that Jesus HEXED Judas and caused him to be possessed by the devil and that is why Judas immediately departed and went to betray Jesus.
"It is the one to whom I give this piece of bread when I have dipped it in the dish". So when he had dipped the piece of bread, he gave it to Judas son of Simon Iscariot. After he received the piece of bread, Satan entered into him."​

Even in Luke 22:3-4 it says Judas was possessed by the devil while betraying Jesus, but does not elaborate like John does over how he got to be in such a state.
Then Satan entered into Judas called Iscariot, who was one of the twelve; he went away and conferred with the chief priests and officers of the temple police about how he might betray him to them.​

Jesus said someone is going to betray him. They asked him who? Instead of naming Judas outright without any TRICKERY, he instead proceeded to dip a piece of bread into wine then hand it to one of them who was then entered by the devil after eating the HEXED bread?

Upon careful consideration of the verses below it looks like Jesus ordered the devil to possess Judas to compel him to betray Jesus so as to achieve the desired outcome of being finally executed in order to fulfill Jesus' plots .... see especially John 12:27-36 but also see Matthew 16:21-23, Matthew 17:22-23, Mark 8:31-33, Luke 9:21-22.
John 13:21-31
21 When Jesus had thus said, he was troubled in spirit, and testified, and said, Verily, verily, I say unto you, that one of you shall betray me.
22 Then the disciples looked one on another, doubting of whom he spake.
23 Now there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved.
24 Simon Peter therefore beckoned to him, that he should ask who it should be of whom he spake.
25 He then lying on Jesus' breast saith unto him, Lord, who is it?
26 Jesus answered, He it is, to whom I shall give a sop, when I have dipped it. And when he had dipped the sop, he gave it to Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon.
27 And after the sop Satan entered into him. Then said Jesus unto him, That thou doest, do quickly.
30 He then having received the sop went immediately out: and it was night.
31 Therefore, when he was gone out, Jesus said, Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him.​

Notice that Judas is an innocent victim here. Judas was POSSESSED by Satan on the behest of Jesus.

It was Jesus who dipped the bread in an apparently enchanted wine and thus caused poor Judas to become controlled by Jesus’ crony the Devil. Jesus even orders him to go ahead and do what he was told to do quickly.

Given Jesus' powers over demons and devils and his ability to exorcise them out of anyone with just a few words of magic, he could have easily exorcised poor Judas from any demonic possession if it was not his intention for him to be possessed...no?

But Jesus, in order to carry out his plots, caused poor unfortunate Judas to be possessed by the devil and to do a deed that Judas would have not willingly carried out had he not been ENCHANTED and under a magical SPELL.

31Therefore, when he was gone out, Jesus said, Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him.​

In other words Jesus NEW JOLLY WELL what the Devil possessing Judas was going to do. He knew jolly well that it was going to accomplish his plotting in order to get glorified.

So here you have it folks….. The DEVIL IS IN CAHOOTS WITH JESUS according to the Buybull ITSELF.... if not in fact Jesus is the boss devil himself ordering about a lesser devil.

Of course that is not surprising when you consider that Jesus (the counter ego of YHWH) was already, for a long time before, quite versed in LYING and DECEPTION.
Ezekiel 14:9 And if the prophet be deceived when he hath spoken a thing, I the LORD have deceived that prophet, and I will stretch out my hand upon him, and will destroy him from the midst of my people Israel.

2 Chronicles 18:22 Now therefore, behold, the LORD hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of these thy prophets


Notice how he CONTROLS and manipulates poor Pharaoh so as to eventually feign an excuse to massacre children and animals (as he always loved to do).... and for what.... so that he can glorify himself.
Romans 9:17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth." 18 Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.​

Notice here what he admits to doing..... and all for what... to glorify himself.
Ezekiel 20:25-26 Wherefore I gave them also statutes that were not good, and judgments whereby they should not live; And I polluted them in their own gifts, in that they caused to pass through the fire all that openeth the womb, that I might make them desolate, to the end that they might know that I am the LORD.​

Look how he cheats and tricks poor Ahab here
1 Kings 22:22-23 The angel answered, ‘I will go out and become a spirit of lies in the mouths of Ahab’s prophets—they will all speak lies.’ So the Lord said, ‘Yes, that will fool Ahab. Go out and do that.’ So that is what has happened here. The Lord made your prophets lie to you. The Lord himself decided to bring this disaster to you.​

But Above all.... who but the vilest of demons and devils.... who but the most heinous of monsters would say stuff like this
Leviticus 26:14-32 If ye will not hearken unto me, and will not do all these commandments;.....I will also send wild beasts among you, which shall rob you of your children, and destroy your cattle, and make you few in number; and your high ways shall be desolate.....And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat.​

And of course his followers LYING for his sake is a good indication of who Jesus really was.
Paul dissimulates and hucksters and shysters for Jesus's sake
  • 1 Corinthians 9:20-23 To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God's law but am under Christ's law), so as to win those not having the law. To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some. I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings."

Eusebius, Emperor Constantine's bishop, legalizes deception for Jesus' sake
  • How it may be lawful and fitting to use falsehood as a medicine, and for the benefit of those who want to be deceived.

And Martin Luther the founder of Protestantism sanctified lying for Jesus' sake
  • What harm would it do, if a man told a good strong lie for the sake of the good and for the Christian church ... a lie out of necessity, a useful lie, a helpful lie, such lies would not be against God, he would accept them.

Martin Luther also explained why reason is not something Jesus' followers should value
  • Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has; it never comes to the aid of spiritual things, but - more frequently than not - struggles against the divine Word, treating with contempt all that emanates from God

And Jesus fully agreed with him
  • Proverbs 3:5 Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
  • 1 Corinthians 1:19 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.
  • 1 Corinthians 1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.
  • 1 Corinthians 1:27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise;
 
Last edited:
Alright, I looked it up and read some of the first chapter. It is Satan and, although God gives him permission to do so, Satan does the naughty to Job.

"And the Lord said unto Satan, Behold, all that he hath is in thy power; only upon himself put not forth thine hand. So Satan went forth from the presence of the Lord." KJV


Thanks.
 
Satan appears in Job just as someone for God to talk to. God himself inflicts all of Job's suffering.

Otherwise, you're not going to see Satan almost anywhere in the Old Testament.


ETA: To my memory, the popular idea of Satan came from illiterate and/or firebrand itinerant European preachers, drawing on a variety of pagan cultural myths and mixing liberally with vague assertions of biblical authority.

Well, the idea of a malevolent force controlling the world was certainly a feature of Jewish apocalypticism, but probably not identical to the "adversary" character of the OT. If anything it probably came from Zoroastrianism.
 
More from Job, chapter one:

"6 Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them. 7 The Lord said to Satan, “From where have you come?” Satan answered the Lord and said, “From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking up and down on it.”

From that passage, it sounds like Satan is a "someone" and not just a concept of evil.
 
In Job It is not the same "entity"........
Basically all that Satan stuff is near 99% to 99.9% apocrypha.

ETA: apocrypha is not the correct word as it comes from popular myths, not from not accepted bible text. I can't remember the technical word.

The word you're looking for is apocryphal; it's come to mean something "seeming to come from authority but actually spurious." It may indeed be from various denominations' Apocryphas but generally is not since many folks don't even know about the Apocrypha for either the OT or the NT.
 
If a devil wanted to cause strife and mayhem and schisms and atrocities between humans throughout the ages I doubt he could have done any better than the Buybull.

Consider this funny story of what may have occurred on a sleepy afternoon eons ago:
The scene: God and Satan are discussing the design of humans on a dull afternoon.

G: I am going to create humans and give them wisdom and goodness and they will love me.

S: So you are going to make them worship you?

G: No...that defeats the purpose... They will do it out of reverence to me.

S: Ah....but that is no good either. They can't help but revere you if they know you and see you.

G: Yeah....isn't that the point?

S: Not really.... that doesn't prove anything if they love you just because you do things for them and they can see you as a guardian and protector. They would be morons if they don't and YOU cannot create morons can you?

G: No... I cannot create morons...you are right. But Hmmmmm....you are right. How can I test that they would love me for me and not for the things I do for them?

S: If I may suggest something?

G: Well....go ahead!

S: I think that you should NEVER EVER show yourself to them. If before they go extinct they have come to conclude that you are THE GOD then that shows they were sufficiently clever and a testament to your creative wisdom.

G: OK…. I will just help them ANONYMOUSLY.

S: Oh no....that won't do. If you help them that would be a dead give away...no?

G: Ok...then I will just make sure no calamities would ever befall them.

S: Oh...no that won't do either…. What kind of test is that? If nothing bad happens despite which they loved you then what kind of character test is that?

G: Hmmm....ok... I will just let them be on their own and if they grow to love me then we know they loved me for me and not just because I helped them out.

S: But that is not enough.

G: What now....what else do you want me to do.

S: Well....One has a choice only if one has things to choose from. If there are no other temptations how can we know that they chose at all? We need to tempt them away from you and if they resist then we know how clever they are.

G: I don't like this. After all I love them and you now have me rain hell on them and not help them and then you want me to also DECEIVE them too?

S: Well....it is up to you....but if you really want to be sure!

G: What do you propose then?


S: Here are my rules for the bet:
  • You leave them all alone. You never show yourself or manifest any sign or indication of your existence.
  • They are to be left to fend for themselves against all natural disasters and diseases and so forth.
  • Every now and then, I will make sure to pretend to be some God and try to convince man to worship me as if I am the real god. I will also make sure that I do that many times in various places at the same time.
  • Let’s say I do that for 10 million years.
  • At the end of that time, if there are any humans who are not fooled by the myriad of godly disguises and are in fact not worshiping any of these disguises then YOU win.
  • I get to keep the souls of the ones that fall for my shams. YOU get the ATHEISTS.
G: Even the atheists that are killers and rapists? What about the theists that are good and their only fault is that they fell for the ruses?

S: Well….what do you want?

G: Any people who harm other people and have made any others miserable you get whether they fell for your ruses or not. Any ones that have been kind and never intentionally or directly harmed anyone I get whether they fell for your ruses or not.

S: That is not fair. I should get all the ones that worshiped me in any guise regardless. After all I can make a case that by worshiping my hoaxes they wasted valuable time that they could have better devoted to other tasks that could have benefited humanity more.

G: Look…. I don’t like you taking ANY souls. What are you going to do with them anyway… No…. my decision is final. I agree to all your proposals EXCEPT let’s just have it so that all people who die just stay that way….except for the ones that do bad stuff….them… you get to torture for a million year and then extinguish.

S: So even the good ones just die?

G: Yes…all just die but for the bad ones whom you get for a million years and then you extinguish them and we are done.


S: So….let’s be clear about the terms:
  • You never ever interfere or show your face.
  • I get to do what I want.
  • If by the end of 10 million years there are good atheists….you win….otherwise you lose.
G: OK….you are on……

S: How many matches do you want to play?
:thumbsup: I like.
 
The devil made me do it! And this thread isn't helping my convince my wife!
 
Well, the idea of a malevolent force controlling the world was certainly a feature of Jewish apocalypticism, but probably not identical to the "adversary" character of the OT. If anything it probably came from Zoroastrianism.


In fact that is what Judaism is in the first place... Zoroastrianism that has absorbed and incorporated Canaanite pagan elements and later some Hellenic and Egyptian paganisms too.

Much like what Christianity is ... Jewish Zoroastrianism which has absorbed and incorporated European pagan elements and later even Native American and Asian as well as African paganisms.

Much like Islam... Jewish Zoroastrianism which has absorbed and incorporated Arabian pagan elements and later Asian and African and Christian paganisms too.

In the end it is all Persian Zoroastrianism that has evolved to appeal to natives of the various lands that the Zoroastrian Missionaries have gone to in the wake of Imperial Conquests.

And its off shoots (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) furthered the missionary work in the wake of other Imperial Conquests by the Neo-Imperialisms.
 
In the end it is all Persian Zoroastrianism that has evolved to appeal to natives of the various lands that the Zoroastrian Missionaries have gone to in the wake of Imperial Conquests.

And its off shoots (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) furthered the missionary work in the wake of other Imperial Conquests by the Neo-Imperialisms.

So the three Magi at the Nativity were really - Magi? So Pharasees that Jesus railed against were really - Persian?

Say it is not so! :)
 
So the three Magi at the Nativity were really - Magi? So Pharasees that Jesus railed against were really - Persian?

Say it is not so! :)


It is not so... because they were really fictive characters in a fairy tale.

But they did serve as part of the "mystery" which the fictive Jesus and literary prop Paul kept telling us that the Christian cult is.

The "mystery" of course being that it is all Zoroastrianism and the Magi were a literary prop to confirm that Jesus was blessed and approved of by the headquarters of the religion.
 
So the three Magi at the Nativity were really - Magi? So Pharasees that Jesus railed against were really - Persian?

Say it is not so! :)
The "Magi" we're "magians". The word, as in "magic" simply means "power" and is, I think, a cognate of the english word "mighty". But I don't think that the Pharisees were Parsees.
... from Aramaic perishayya, emphatic plural of perish "separated, separatist," corresponding to Hebrew parush, from parash "he separated."​
Separatists.
 
A "Satan" is really more of a biblical stock character. A demon who shows up to screw with humans, sometimes working with God. Probably Zoroastrian dualism had some influence and Satan gradually turns into more of a cosmic force - yet still in the Gospels we see him running errands for God.


Exactly. If god created everything, where did satan come from?

It's god's other hand. Sick sadistic fartwind god who demands genocide, rape and the murder of babies.

All the signs point to this "god" creature actually being the devil… including the black magic ritual of human sacrifice upon which the xtian religion is based!
 
'Jesus is the DEVIL
Or at least the Devil works for or in cahoots with Jesus'

This is why I prefer Devil-Jesus, a.k.a. Lucifer. The devilish image cleanses the Jesus figure of slave-morality making it a better symbol for the Ubermensch
within the context of Judeo-Christian symbology.
 

Back
Top Bottom