Listen, I apologise to all concerned if my posts and or tone are being perceived as gloating or snarky. they are all supposed to be in good humour.
However continued silence and/or dodging of the fundamental questions and or evidence on display, will generally lead to ever-more sarcastic delivery of the evidence until there is some response.
if "leaving the thread" is that response, well, that is unfortunately necessary.
As the sole representative of the statement: "Yes it IS possible" for the last couple of weeks, it is my internet "duty" to represent the modern high-tech world of leveraged trading in it's best light, for posters on the thread, and the lurking world at large, that is what I have attempted to do.
If people are going to interject with their market "truisms" on the one hand dismissing any form of trading as "woo" while on the other hand claiming credit themselves for being "canny investors" (in a permanently rising market for 30 years) and openly recommend their own strategies and stocks in the thread as a better option, then those assumptions should be tested, no?
If people want to start addressing the evidence with sensible observations or questions, I will be happy to tone down the "humour" however if people are going to continuously take the "we know better than you" approach, ignoring any evidence to the contrary, then mocking with ongoing evidence may continue.