States refusing to accept Syrian refugees

Myron Proudfoot said:
apparently refusing to take in Syrian women and children will protect us from attacks by young men who are longtime residents of France and Belgium...


Seriously the American rightwing is the biggest collection of pant wetting sissies I've even seen. Gays, AIDs, Ebola, Muslims, Commies, the BLM, young black men with toy guns, Syrian women and kids.... the list of things that make them scream like little little girls and go hiding under their beds is seemingly endless....
Click to expand...

This...

Cleon said:
Today we discovered that the French "cheese-eating surrender monkeys" have more courage and compassion than American conservatives.
Click to expand...

and this.

Seems that 25,000 of these Syrian refugees are arriving in Canada by the end of the year. Remember that northern border wall that seemed such a joke a couple of months ago? Better start construction soon, and don't expect us to pay for it. :D
 
Norman Alexander said:
Of course! All you need is a guaranteed foolproof way of ensuring they are indeed Christians. Because any starving, frightened Muslim refugees fleeing chaos and armed conflict with barely the clothes on their backs are not going to pretend to be Christians to get to safety.
Click to expand...


Obviously, we need to use the same technique that was used when accused witches were forced to recite the Lord's Prayer or "under God" was added to the US Pledge of Allegiance to trip up Communist infiltrators. Find a magic phrase that Muslims are physically incapable of saying, no matter how cunning and deceptive thy are, and force all of the refugees to say it.

That, or the idea is that if a Muslim claims to be a Christian, God will strike them dead on the spot with a lightning bolt to protect His chosen nation.
 
From the realm of people that can actually affect the refugees. Rand Paul has tweeted this:

My amendment will end housing assistance to refugees. It sends a clear message to the president. We have control of the power of the purse!
Click to expand...

Stay classy Dr. Paul. :thumbsup:
 
Stacko said:
From the realm of people that can actually affect the refugees. Rand Paul has tweeted this:

My amendment will end housing assistance to refugees. It sends a clear message to the president. We have control of the power of the purse!
Click to expand...

Stay classy Dr. Paul. :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

All I can say about Paul is what an utter nob
 
Toontown said:
You lot could say you'll take more than 300 per year.

I know this brings it's own problems.
Click to expand...

We could, as I have said about 10 times on this thread. I think we should be taking a few more

My point is if your so paranoid that you no longer want to take them, there are other options.

Maybe old ladies as well
 
cullennz said:
We could, as I have said about 10 times on this thread. I think we should be taking a few more
Click to expand...

Your talk is dirt cheap. I'm at a loss to explain to you how unimpressed I am.

cullennz said:
My point is if your so paranoid that you no longer want to take them, there are other options.

Maybe old ladies as well
Click to expand...

If I was the president, I would take as many young Syrian men as would agree to my terms: they would agree to be trained and equipped for war, then shipped back to Syria to retake the country from ISIS with full U.S. logistical and air support.

After all, if they won't even defend their own country, they certainly do not deserve to be taking up space and resources here. And I wouldn't be asking any more of them than was asked of me and millions of other Americans over the decades.
 
Toontown said:
Your talk is dirt cheap. I'm at a loss to explain to you how unimpressed I am.



If I was the president, I would take as many young Syrian men as would agree to my terms: they would agree to be trained and equipped for war, then shipped back to Syria to retake the country from ISIS with full U.S. logistical and air support.

After all, if they won't even defend their own country, they certainly do not deserve to be taking up space and resources here. And I wouldn't be asking any more of them than was asked of me and millions of other Americans over the decades.
Click to expand...

I don't care if you aren't impressed

Then do that
 
Toontown said:
Your talk is dirt cheap. I'm at a loss to explain to you how unimpressed I am.



If I was the president, I would take as many young Syrian men as would agree to my terms: they would agree to be trained and equipped for war, then shipped back to Syria to retake the country from ISIS with full U.S. logistical and air support.

After all, if they won't even defend their own country, they certainly do not deserve to be taking up space and resources here. And I wouldn't be asking any more of them than was asked of me and millions of other Americans over the decades.
Click to expand...

Hasn't that been the tried and true method of creating even more terrorists?
 
NoahFence said:
Hasn't that been the tried and true method of creating even more terrorists?
Click to expand...

:wwt

No. Allowing a terrorist organization to take over entire countries is a great way to multiply it's numbers though.

Am I to understand that you are opposed to Syrians defending their country against terrorist invaders?

Do you know a way of defending a country against being taken over by terrorists that doesn't involve fighting the terrorists?

Is that cat's neck broken?
 
Last edited:
A lot of this is only happening because of your illegally invading Iraq so you are kind of cleaning up your own mess
 
Toontown said:
If I was the president, I would take as many young Syrian men as would agree to my terms: they would agree to be trained and equipped for war, then shipped back to Syria to retake the country from ISIS with full U.S. logistical and air support.

After all, if they won't even defend their own country, they certainly do not deserve to be taking up space and resources here. And I wouldn't be asking any more of them than was asked of me and millions of other Americans over the decades.
Click to expand...

On behalf of the Kingdom of Norway, I would like to thank your country for sheltering many of my countrymen during the second world war. Among them was the current king of Norway, Harald V. I'm grateful that people like you weren't standing on the docks as they arrived and made these kinds of demands on them.

Not everyone has it in them to fight. Not everyone is cut out to be a soldier. Some people just want a safe place for their families. As a former soldier myself, I would never begrudge them that.
 
Ryokan said:
Not everyone has it in them to fight. Not everyone is cut out to be a soldier. Some people just want a safe place for their families. As a former soldier myself, I would never begrudge them that.
Click to expand...

Including millions of Americans, who had to do it anyway.
 
It takes 2 years to process a refugee and what, a week or a month to get a tourist visa? Think a French citizen couldn't get a tourist visa for the US? Why would ISIS use a refugee disguise to sneak a sleeper in this country? It's a completely different situation in the EU.

It's right wing pandering.
 
Last edited:
Toontown said:
Including millions of Americans, who had to do it anyway.
Click to expand...

I know you think this is some sort of winning point, but I don't get it.

Would you have turned away Jewish refugees during WW2, as well? Given them the same choice you seem to want to give to Syrian refugees, that either they go back to fight or they, well, go back anyway?

ETA: Besides, many of them have been fighting. I know among the refugees that have come to Norway, there are many who fought with the rebel forces. There have even been some who were in Assad's army. They've been fighting for years, without leave or respite and in one of the most hellish conflicts since the western front in WW1. Now they just want to live in peace, with their families, in a safe place.
 
Last edited:
Ryokan said:
I know you think this is some sort of winning point, but I don't get it.

Would you have turned away Jewish refugees during WW2, as well? Given them the same choice you seem to want to give to Syrian refugees, that either they go back to fight or they, well, go back anyway?
Click to expand...

It's the same choice I was given. Do my duty, go to prison, or run away to Canada.

It's the same choice Americans were given in WWII. Fight to free Europe, go to prison, or run away to...well, not Canada. Canada would have sent them back.

It's the choice of fighting to be free. Not having to live like a refugee.

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom