• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, those are trade agreements. Nothing diminishes the sovereignty of any signatory nation.

That's why I said that it is not enough.
Only the Great Union from all developed and correctly developing countries according my project can make from this dark world the light world.
 
Even though I am both, by any objective standard (and I have extensively studied Hebrew, and Aramaic, and Koine Greek), I disagree.

Very phenomenal position!
From one side you are one of very little number of people who know Holy Resurrected language and the language of Christ and from another side you are oppose the global program that gives those 2 languages to all Christians and Holy Resurrected Language to every God believer.
 
The Slavs only started to exist in the ninth century because that's when they started to write in Cyrillic? They existed long before that.

The Khazars didn't convert to Turks. They were already Turks. Only one single word in Khazar writing survives and it is a Turkish word written in old Turkish runic. Most Khazar writings are in Hebrew language and script, because the Khazar rulers and many of the people adopted Judaism.

What you say is a banal knowledge that is written in every historical book.
What I say is my own version of historical events.
Khazars from Turks or Turks from Khazars?
This is the great question.
Slavs.
Where are they from?
You think that they are from Scythians.
I think that they are Khazars converted in christianity by Cyrill and Methodius.
 
[quote name="Stuart" post=10915234]And your proof for any of the above is?
<br />
<br />
"It is the matter of fact that the most cultural and educated people in the world agree that the Language of Christ and Apostles that we have loosed is one of the greatest values."

Facts are provable. Please provide the names of these people

Ta[/QUOTE]

Please do it yourself.
Ask people in online and in offline do they value the languages of Christ and the language of Book of Books.
 
This isn't the diet you have described to us earlier.
In you previous version of the truth every thing was raw. I suspect we will find out in the fullness of time that a seventh of the above is eaten every day with a nice bit of cooked fish, chicken lamb or beef

Once more I say that menu is not so importent.
Most importent is to be in one of the 7 steps of my lifestyle.
I develop my menu even now.
Last Saturday for example I made a new dish.
250 grams of raw buckwheat I poured by raw milk, and 6 hours later I received a very tasty dish.
 
What you say is a banal knowledge that is written in every historical book.
In all books because it's true.
What I say is my own version of historical events.
Which comes entirely from your imagination.
Khazars from Turks or Turks from Khazars?

This is the great question.

Slavs.

Where are they from?

You think that they are from Scythians.

I think that they are Khazars converted in christianity by Cyrill and Methodius.
Cyrill knew Slavs from Thessalonika and Moravia, I think. Here are questions for you. Were there any Slavs in non-Turkic areas? Yes.

Were there any pagan Slavs prior to the introduction of Christianity? Yes of course. Poland, for example, was inhabited by Slavs before the conversion to Christianity. Before the conversion, therefore, the Poles were not Turkic-speaking Khazars.

Have I said that Slavs are from Scythians? I don't remember saying that. Later Polish aristocrats claimed descent from Sarmatians, and Voltaire accepts their claim in his biography of Charles XII of Sweden, who conquered Poland. But I don't think it is now generally believed to be true.

You may be interested to know that in the Middle Ages the Scots claimed descent from Scythians. In a letter to Pope John XXII, written in 1320, the Chancellor of Scotland stated that the Scots

de Maiori Schithia per Mare tirenium et Columpnas Herculis transiens et in Hispania inter ferocissimas gentes per multa temporum curricula Residens​

"Crossed from Greater Scythia through the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules and dwelt in Spain for many ages among the most ferocious tribes." But that is probably utter rubbish, suggested merely by the similarity of the words "Scythian" and "Scot". (You will recall that similar-sounding words in different languages are not always the same word.)

And I think that many of your speculations on these subjects are completely nonsensical too.
 
That's why I said that it is not enough.
Only the Great Union from all developed and correctly developing countries according my project can make from this dark world the light world.

Yet no countries are going to do that. Creating your union is beyond your capability. This is good because what you've made up is a terrible idea.
 
<br />
<br />
"It is the matter of fact that the most cultural and educated people in the world agree that the Language of Christ and Apostles that we have loosed is one of the greatest values."

Facts are provable. Please provide the names of these people

Ta

Please do it yourself.
Ask people in online and in offline do they value the languages of Christ and the language of Book of Books.[/QUOTE]
Why? You've told so many lies, why should anyone bother checking?
 
What you say is a banal knowledge that is written in every historical book.
What I say is my own version of historical events.
Khazars from Turks or Turks from Khazars?
This is the great question.
Slavs.
Where are they from?
You think that they are from Scythians.
I think that they are Khazars converted in christianity by Cyrill and Methodius.

Banal facts are better than your lies.
 
You are saying that at first people communicated by means of "gestures" like yawning and scratching (even apes are more advanced that this!). Then the humans drew pictures of themselves yawning and scratching, and that (you tell us) is the origin of hieroglyphs. In all this time there was no communication by speech!!

Speech commenced only when people started to pronounce the hieroglyphs.

That is a very strange sequence of events.

At first, Stalin embraced a crazy theory of the origin of languages proposed by a half-Scottish, half-Georgian linguist named Nikolos Marr. This person has been described thus

Nicholas Marr is one of the 'lunatics' in Marina Yaguello's book Lunatic Lovers of Language. Other epithets levelled at him by fellow linguists include "madman" and "megalomaniac". Yet his theories were lauded in the Soviet Union between about 1930 and 1950.​

After 1950, Stalin abandoned Marr's doctrines. Fortunately for Marr, he had already died, in 1934, so Stalin was unable to repress him physically.

I think your gestures > "hieroglyphs" > speech hypothesis has something in common with Marr's ideas, or at least with the lunacy embodied in them.

He believed that the sounds of the languages arose via collective human activity and it was the socio-economic nature of the society that determined the language. Over the years he worked to discover the minimum number of semantic elements that formed the basis of all the world's languages and he finally got this number down to four. So, what he was saying was that all the words in all the languages of the world could ultimately be traced back to four 'words' or elements, namely sal, ber, yon and rosh.​

Are these the sounds people made when, as you inform us, they:

then learned to pronounce the characters?​

Boris Porshnev
“About the beginning of human being history”.
From this great book I have made my hypothesizes about phenomena of language.
We have remember the first words of Bible:» In the beginning it was the Word….
 
Christians by definition are not "jooooos"
Constantine was a Mithraist and adopted Christianity out of political expediency.
Rome was not his political nor religious centre of power.
The Koine Greek versions pre-date Constantine by hundreds of years.

Or in plain lingua franca, BOLLOCKS.

First Christians were from citizens of Judea of 1st – 3rd centauries.
There language was Aramaic.
“Jesus was Jew” – Martin Luther. But not “joooooo”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom