Ed clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

[The Big Dog]

FBI Recovers Some Deleted Emails From Hillary's Server

The FBI has salvaged work and personal emails thought to have been deleted from the private server Hillary Clinton used while she was secretary of state, Bloomberg first reported Tuesday night.

The FBI has been trying figure out how many classified emails Clinton had on her server and how they got there. The agency is concerned about whether Hillary Clinton's private email system exposed any classified information, and if so, the extent of exposure, as well as why it occurred.

Clinton’s presidential campaign spokesman Nick Merrill told Fox News that Clinton’s team “will always cooperate with the FBI,” and that Clinton and her staff “simply don’t know what the FBI has, and doesn’t have” in regard to the ongoing investigation.

Hey, don't Nick and the FBI know that Hillary isn't under investigation? I read it on the iSkep!

By the way, Hillary does not know what the FBI has? These were her *********** emails. She's running for President? Cripes.....

 

[applecorped]

Anyone asking for "evidence" from 16.5 would do well to remember this post. In bizarro GOP critical thinking, you can't win argument with evidence. Conjecture, speculation, and prejudice trump evidence every time. Derp, indeed.

off topic

 

[TheL8Elvis]

Throughout the controversy over her use of a private e-mail system while she was secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton has described her decision last year to turn over thousands of work-related e-mails as a response to a routine-sounding records request.

....

But State Department officials provided new information Tuesday that undercuts Clinton’s characterization. They said the request was not simply about general rec*ord-keeping but was prompted entirely by the discovery that Clinton had exclusively used a private e-mail system.

also:

"The FBI has been investigating the security of Clinton’s e-mail setup. Officials have said Clinton is not a target of the inquiry."

 

[WildCat]

also:

"The FBI has been investigating the security of Clinton’s e-mail setup. Officials have said Clinton is not a target of the inquiry."

Unbelievable you still think that means anything.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens on Tuesday rejected an appeal by former Illinois Gov. George Ryan to remain free on bail while he appeals his corruption conviction. The 73-year-old Republican is due to report to a federal correctional center in Oxford, Wis., no later than Wednesday.

...The U.S. attorney at the time, Scott Lassar, said in October 1998 that Ryan was not a target of the investigation

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16051850

How is that possible?

 

[The Big Dog]

also:

"The FBI has been investigating the security of Clinton’s e-mail setup. Officials have said Clinton is not a target of the inquiry."

THAT is what you took from that article???

Wow. Sure Hillary has been lying, sure Hillary crammed her foot in her mouth, but the FBI has not publicly announced that she is the target of the on-going investigation, so:

we all good. Hillary 2016, Not a Publicly announced target of the investigation into her emails and her cowboy server.

and the FBI always announces their targets, right?

 

[The Big Dog]

Lolz, my Elevator news feed's top headline was "FBI recovers deleted emails on Hillary Clinton's Private Server."

Doesn't my Elevator know that Hillary is Ready and almost totally not a target of the FBI's investigation into her emails kept on her private server?

I read it on a site for Skeptics.

 

[Newtons Bit]

also:

"The FBI has been investigating the security of Clinton’s e-mail setup. Officials have said Clinton is not a target of the inquiry."

Who? Which officials are these? Do they even work for the FBI? Something tells me that they're from State...

 

[The Big Dog]

Pretty terrible day for Hillary, caught lying about when and why the State Department asked her to return those emails, crammed her foot in her mouth by stating that she didn't "know" about that (very Presidential!) and now the FBI has cracked her attempt to wipe the server.

Now the question of the hour:

WHAT WILL THE FBI FIND IN THOSE DELETED EMAILS?

My best guess? A boatload of stuff about the Clinton Family Foundation.

 

[plague311]

Pretty terrible day for Hillary, caught lying about when and why the State Department asked her to return those emails, crammed her foot in her mouth by stating that she didn't "know" about that (very Presidential!) and now the FBI has cracked her attempt to wipe the server.

Now the question of the hour:

WHAT WILL THE FBI FIND IN THOSE DELETED EMAILS?

My best guess? A boatload of stuff about the Clinton Family Foundation.

Which is none of their *********** business, and has nothing to do with Benghazi, which is what all of this crap started over. However, you now made it clear what you're actually after, and what this actually is, a partisan witch hunt to expose anything about Hillary possible. Keepin' it classy.

 

[wareyin]

Which is none of their *********** business, and has nothing to do with Benghazi, which is what all of this crap started over. However, you now made it clear what you're actually after, and what this actually is, a partisan witch hunt to expose anything about Hillary possible. Keepin' it classy.

Was there ever any doubt?

 

[The Big Dog]

Which is none of their *********** business, and has nothing to do with Benghazi, which is what all of this crap started over. However, you now made it clear what you're actually after, and what this actually is, a partisan witch hunt to expose anything about Hillary possible. Keepin' it classy.

Avid readers of the thread know that the emails being sought by people other than 16.5 include such diverse subjects as:

Huma Abedin's employment with the Clinton Family Foundation
Clinton Family Foundation fundraising with Foreign entities doing business with the state department.

You have been reading the thread right?

Oh well, 16.5 is the bad guy.....

 

[plague311]

Avid readers of the thread know that the emails being sought by people other than 16.5 include such diverse subjects as:

Huma Abedin's employment with the Clinton Family Foundation
Clinton Family Foundation fundraising with Foreign entities doing business with the state department.

There has been no evidence at all that any "foreign entities" have gained anything from Hillary due to their donations, and if the GOP wants to open an investigation into those accusations then they should. They shouldn't use this panel to do it, but then again it doesn't matter to the GOP as long as they can smear her as much as possible.

You have been reading the thread right?

As much as I can possibly stomach at a time. It usually takes me awhile to get through a page due to laughing at the ignorance.

Oh well, 16.5 is the bad guy.....

What's this? A strawman by 16.5? SAY IT ISN'T SO?!?!?! You're the master of identifying fallacies, I thought.

I've never claimed you're the bad guy, just that you're a mouthpiece for partisan talking points. You have your cheerleading section though, so you aren't alone. Daveoc, Zigg, etc. So it isn't you, don't make this personal. It's the GOP supports\voters in general. I don't blame you, you're just parroting what you're told.

 

[DavidJames]

Was there ever any doubt?

Certainly not in my eyes. Republicans think the Starr fishing expedition was the model for future political campaigns. Of course, we all know how that worked out for them. But being tone deaf to their failures, they march forward. Kind of like the past 2 elections they failed to realize their far right craziness was the root cause, they interpreted the results as the candidates weren't far right crazy enough.

I've been saying for many years now, the far right Republican crazy is not accepted by a majority of American's. To compensate they choose the politics of personal destruction.

 

[Ziggurat]

I've never claimed you're the bad guy, just that you're a mouthpiece for partisan talking points. You have your cheerleading section though, so you aren't alone. Daveoc, Zigg, etc. So it isn't you, don't make this personal. It's the GOP supports\voters in general. I don't blame you, you're just parroting what you're told.

You do realize that davefoc has said on multiple occasions in this thread that he's still probably going to vote for Hillary, don't you? And when you accuse someone of "just parroting what you're told", that is indeed a personal insult, and you have in fact made it personal.

 

[WildCat]

Liar, liar, pantsuit on fire!

 

[The Big Dog]

There has been no evidence at all that any "foreign entities" have gained anything from Hillary due to their donations, and if the GOP wants to open an investigation into those accusations then they should. They shouldn't use this panel to do it, but then again it doesn't matter to the GOP as long as they can smear her as much as possible.

...

I've never claimed you're the bad guy, just that you're a mouthpiece for partisan talking points. You have your cheerleading section though, so you aren't alone. Daveoc, Zigg, etc. So it isn't you, don't make this personal. It's the GOP supports\voters in general. I don't blame you, you're just parroting what you're told.

The lawsuits regarding Abedin/CFF aspect were filed by the AP and others.

And actually I am posting breaking news from the Washington Post and CBS News.

Are they partisans too?

/the irony of accusing the other guy of being partisan is noted!

 

[wareyin]

off topic

That's cute, pointing out that a poster has no evidence for his claim, and in fact shuns evidence is "off topic".

 

[plague311]

You do realize that davefoc has said on multiple occasions in this thread that he's still probably going to vote for Hillary, don't you?

And this has what to do with the cost of tea in China? Just because he'll vote for her doesn't mean he hasn't been fully and completely agreeing with the nonsense spewed here for at least the last how many pages. Not to mention he's posted that stupid meme that 16.5 found initially. So I would count that as as being in said section.

And when you accuse someone of "just parroting what you're told", that is indeed a personal insult, and you have in fact made it personal.

Which, of course, I said after he personalized the conversation in the first place, and I don't view that as an insult. It's stating what someone is doing.

If I say, "you're playing basketball" and you are in fact playing basketball then that is no insult is it?

 

[The Big Dog]

Which, of course, I said after he personalized the conversation in the first place, and I don't view that as an insult. It's stating what someone is doing.

If I say, "you're playing basketball" and you are in fact playing basketball then that is no insult is it?

I personalized the conversation? Oh dear... Is Hillary a member here?

Anyway, any comments about the fact that the State Department contradicted the nonsense story, or how Hillary claimed she didn't "know" about it?

Seems like Hillary has been making up stories, yes?

 

[TheL8Elvis]

I personalized the conversation? Oh dear... Is Hillary a member here?

Anyway, any comments about the fact that the State Department contradicted the nonsense story, or how Hillary claimed she didn't "know" about it?

Seems like Hillary has been making up stories, yes?

From the article

“In the process of responding to congressional document requests pertaining to Benghazi, State Department officials recognized that it had access to relatively few email records from former Secretary Clinton,” State Department spokesman John Kirby said in a statement e-mailed to The Washington Post. “State Department officials contacted her representatives during the summer of 2014 to learn more about her email use and the status of emails in that account.”

Kirby added that the agency then recognized “that we similarly did not have extensive email records from prior Secretaries of State and therefore included them when we requested their records in October 2014.”

The State Department also realized it was not automatically preserving internal communications, with some other senior officials’ e-mails missing.

What contradiction do you see there ? They didn't ask for her emails until October, as she stated. They contacted "her representatives during the summer of 2014", not her.

Actually , it seems like the state department left hand has absolutely no clue what the state department right hand is doing ... it wasn't until October 2014 they pulled their heads out of their asses and realized they were not automatically preserving internal communications ?