Really, Rat? Really? The best you can do to explain the (future) failure of a hard-left Labour platform is to blame it on the media? It's like it's a whole great conspiracy.......
What "hard-left" platform?
Really, Rat? Really? The best you can do to explain the (future) failure of a hard-left Labour platform is to blame it on the media? It's like it's a whole great conspiracy.......
What "hard-left" platform?
I think this was probably the poll I was thinking of, but the Independent claims the same thing today.Really? Again.....evidence?
How about printing money, tax-and spend, live beyond our means, borrow, borrow, borrow.......all that stuff. How popular is that, do you think? How about leaving NATO? Got any hunches on that one?
You've made some a grand claim on scant evidence, none of which you've provided here.
You remember, where Corbyn said about creating a one-party state that controls all of the means of production.What "hard-left" platform?
You remember, where Corbyn said about creating a one-party state that controls all of the means of production.
No. The one where he spends money he doesn't have. Where he prints money. "Quantative easing for the people". Tax and spend. Borrow, borrow, borrow. That hard-left platform, not your straw one.
Here's another one, listing 9 items. I'm off out in a minute, so can indeed not provide more evidence. You may, if you wish, take that as a concession.So, a 2 year old on-line poll (where no-one was told the costs of re-nationalisation), and no evidence whatsoever for "on the issues where he differs (from the other parties) the public do actually largely agree with him".
It shouldn't be necessary to point out that this is a sceptic's forum, where assertion without evidence can be dismissed forthwith.
If it wasn't so important, it would be hilarious: the leader that few Labour MPs wanted, and all the Conservatives wanted. It could hardly be a bigger gift to the Conservative party. The upside will be an increased interest in politics for a while. The downside is another 10 years of opposition for Labour.
You've got some evidence for this, I presume?
No. The one where he spends money he doesn't have. Where he prints money. "Quantative easing for the people". Tax and spend. Borrow, borrow, borrow. That hard-left platform, not your straw one.
What about evidence for your own dire predictions?.....
Were you against "quantitative easing" when it was the policy of the government?
As opposed to quantitative easing for the financial sector?No. The one where he spends money he doesn't have. Where he prints money. "Quantative easing for the people".
.......I think you're in for a shock. Up to now, it's been easy for Corbyn's enemies to paint him as a loony. All that will now change, as it changed when Michael Foot and Neil Kinnock became Labour leader - and when Ken Livingstone became London mayor...........
It wasn't the policy of the government. It was a policy of the Bank of England.
Just out of interest, who did you vote for?
And the Bank of England is run by hard leftists is it?![]()