You say you are motivated by your enemy. You say you are motivated by hatred.
Your enemy is the "corrupt part of society" you believe you live in.
This is a prejudice. This leads to confirmation bias. So one can only agree with Mary H....
Finally, someone from your side of the fence is honest about what is driving your agenda. And.... you call that observation "idiotic"?
Yes it's plain idiotic.
It's the same of accusing the Palestinians of hating the Israeli Zionists because of an anti-Semitic prejudice.
Indeed the Palestinians hate the Israeli Zionists.
But hatred is the
effect of something, not the cause of it.
I guess very easilly that the pro-Knoxes will try to subvert the causal order of things: instead of admitting that someone hates them because they are thugs, they will state that someone sees them as thugs because they hate them.
It's a childish denial.
The reason why I see an enemy, is not because I am prejudiced. On the contrary. It's because I don't share yours.
Prejudice is ignorance. But the hatred of Palestinains does not originate from
ignorance about the Zionists, it originate from the
knowledge of Zionism.
Mary H just proves to build idiotic reasoning, based on ignorance, also elsewhere, as in the example that I have cited: for example where she states, adamantly, that interrogation must have been illegal because the SC declared them non usable.
This is a patent example of prejudicial thinking. And this is the
model of Mary H thinking on this point too.
Mary H (and you) basically call "prejudice" the fact that I have a
knowledge of facts from a point of view that you don't have and don't understand, and leads to a view of facts that is irreconciliable with yours.
I could guess you would pick up the word "hatred", this is why I added provocatively the line, saying if you like you can interpret it and call it that way. Because you don't understand the difference of
ideology, of contexts and realities. People fail to understand why someone hates them, because they are shielded by their own ignorance they think hatred is a prejudice.
What "motivates" me is certainly more complex than what I expressed in forum lines. What I find curious, and what I note, is that a poster (analemma) was telling about her speculations of what "motivates" me and presented tortuous theories: wondering if I try to defend the "honor of the Judiciary", or if I'm a police officer defending some particular career, etc. That poster was only able to imagine "utilitaristic" motives, some rather disingenuous or cynical motivation.
In fact the object of my interest is narratives. Conflicting narratives, false narratives. Nobody seem to consider that what "motivetes" me (which is what motivates Palestinians, too) may be
truth.
The perception and knowledge of truth is a key factor at the origin of my interest in the case.
