I know that you saw the photo of the flag supporters in South Carolina. I think a significant and vocal number of the flag supporters *are* proud of their racism. I am all for venomous rhetoric about them.
English racists have tried to appropriate the cross of St George as a racist symbol, but that had a history outside racism and there *has* been a valid backlash against it. There is no history outside racism for the battle flag of the Confederacy. That symbol is tainted from its inception. Trying to rescue it is not worthwhile.
As an aside - in this or a related thread someone mentioned the Dukes of Hazard. I am not sure that a car with that flag on its roof, that plays Dixie, and is named after the most famous Confederate general was entirely innocent of Civil War connotations.
Also calling it
"the war of Southern Independence" smacks of revisionism too. Maybe not as much as calling it the war of Northern Aggression.
And it continues... There goes that broad brush again. Of course, I've seen some of the photos, obviously not all that haven't been posted here. Some of it was definitely racist and I condemn that. All of it wasn't, so I won't use that broad brush you and others like so much.
Of course, some of those people were racists, but not all of them were. That's my primary and only point to be made.
Regarding the War for Southern Independence comments. That is the most historically correct term in spite of your insistence to the contrary.
A Civil War is between factions of the same Country. The Southern States had seceded, so they were not a part of the same Country. They had declared their independence the same way the US did in the Revolutionary War. There was and is no Constitutional reason they couldn't separate. Consequently, Civil War is not a correct even tho' it is most frequently used.
I did not use the term War of Northern Aggression, you did. That is not a correct term either as the South fired the first shots against a US Military target and took some US prisoners, so technically the US was defending it's facilities and people, at least initially.
I keep pointing out again and again that the vast majority of the soldiers on both sides were not fighting for or against slavery no matter what you think or believe. That is also precisely why many folks don't see that flag as a racist symbol. The fact that it has been hijacked by deplorable racists elements that have nothing to do with what many people in the South feel seems to be totally lost in this entire discussion.
It's very telling that you think the Dukes of Hazard is about racism. That's a joke and it's on you and others who believe that. What's wrong with Dixie too? Do you think everything about the Southern part of the US is about racism?
I think I'll continue this discussion until I get bored. It's been very educational for me to see some of the venomous rhetoric being used about an entire portion of this Country and painting everyone who lives in it with the same broad brush. As I said earlier, I now have a better understanding of why many folks joined the Confederacy even tho' they had no slaves and didn't support the institution at all in any respects. Bye