Moderated JFK conspiracy theories: it never ends III

Status
Not open for further replies.
-
Robert Harris said:
It wasn't "minds" I was reading. It was the conclusions from the HSCA panel of polygraph experts.
Click to expand...

Please cite where they said that "Ruby... [was] practically begging the WC to take him to a safe place where he could talk, and finally having to settle for a polygraph, which he expected to fail, giving the WC a clue" as you claimed here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=10764159#post10764159

That was your claim, which you're trying to defend by calling it the HSCA's panel of polygraph experts' conclusions.

It should be easy to quote them saying that - if that was their conclusion.

It wasn't. It was your conclusion.

Your propensity to make unproven assertions persists.

Hank
 
Last edited:
JayUtah said:
You continue to mistake me for someone who is playing your game. See my previous posts.
Click to expand...

Well, I'm sure you don't think that all questions about the assassination are part of some "game", do you?

I'll just continue to ask, until I hit on one that you agree is legitimate.
 
HSienzant said:
-

Please cite where they said that "Ruby... [was] practically begging the WC to take him to a safe place where he could talk, and finally having to settle for a polygraph, which he expected to fail, giving the WC a clue" as you claimed here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=10764159#post10764159
Click to expand...

Who is this "they" that you claim I need to cite? You need to learn to differentiate between my statements and statements by others, which I cite.

I responded to your request, You know Ruby expected his polygraph failure to give the WC a clue -- how?

by demonstrating that Ruby showed clear signs of deception when he answered questions related to knowing Oswald and being involved in the conspiracy. Obviously, he knew or at least, expected that his answers would fail.

This is not complicated at all.

That was your claim, which you're trying to defend by calling it the HSCA's panel of polygraph experts' conclusions.
Click to expand...

Read the article. (#3530) I highlighted some of the most important parts.
 
Last edited:
abaddon said:
Because it is yet another unevidenced claim which is required to support the nonsense.

Psychic power, how else?

See above.

Make crap up, prove me wrong. Standard CT behaviour.

God.
Click to expand...

lol. Hardly. I'm reminded of the scene in GROUNDHOG DAY where Bill Murray says to Andie McDowell something along the lines of "Maybe God isn't omniscient. Maybe he's just been around so long and seen so much he just knows what's going to happen next."

I've been debating the JFK assassination with conspiracy theorists online since the days of Prodigy in the early 1990's.

Nothing they say surprises me. Robert claims he's different, but it's still claims that don't track back to his sources, his own perceptions, and logical fallacies as his primary tools for supporting his claims.

And when in doubt, just ignore the post.

Hank (not God)
 
HSienzant said:
lol. Hardly. I'm reminded of the scene in GROUNDHOG DAY where Bill Murray says to Andie McDowell something along the lines of "Maybe God isn't omniscient. Maybe he's just been around so long and seen so much he just knows what's going to happen next.".



Hank (not God)
Click to expand...


That's both bizarre and annoying. I've just had to delete a whole load of words because you said exactly what I was writing.
 
JayUtah said:
You can determine the answer to that on your own through research.
Click to expand...

Jay, I have already done that research, and I've found that you have refused to answer even questions, about your own theory.

I don't think it matters who is asking the questions, Jay. I think you dodge important questions because you don't like the answers.

If you are evading questions, solely because you don't like me, you would have agreed to answer those questions from others, but the problem is not "Robert Harris", is it?

The problem is the questions:D
 
Last edited:
HSienzant said:
There's about 40 points of mine you need to address first, by Robert's Rules of Ordertm
Hank
Click to expand...

Earlier Robert claimed that due to having to debate "the whole forum," he would intentionally let some posts go unanswered. His demonstrated choices about which posts to answer and which to let go, among this allegedly ponderous workload, should give you some indication how profitable it is to engage him on the nominal topic.
 
Robert Harris said:
Jay, I have already done that research...
Click to expand...

This thread existed long before you arrived and will persist long after you leave.

I don't think it matters who is asking the questions, Jay. I think you dodge important questions because you don't like the answers.
Click to expand...

Those are the words you keep insisting on putting in my mouth.

If you are evading questions, solely because you don't like me...
Click to expand...

Do not put words in my mouth. My reasons for not playing your game have been elucidated several times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom