• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
OntarioSquatch said:
I read many anecdotal accounts and do background research to figure out which ones are likely authentic and which ones aren't. If you can successfully figure out a few that actually happened, you can build on that and eventually put together the pieces of the puzzle. The downside to using anecdotal evidence is that you can't really prove what you've learned from it because interpretations of it are all subjective. They've been the foundation of my research though, and it's helped me answer a lot of the questions that I've had.
Click to expand...
That's not research. That's fooling yourself.
 
The copy of frame 352 that I posted was obtained by MK Davis from Patricia Patterson's copy of the film. He paid to get high quality scans of several different frames of the film at a photo lab. Frame 352 was one of them.

Frame 61 is from Bill Munn's inventory of Cibachrome scans. There's a few more from that copy that I can post if you want.
 
OntarioSquatch said:
The copy of frame 352 that I posted was obtained by MK Davis from Patricia Patterson's copy of the film. He paid to get high quality scans of several different frames of the film at a photo lab. Frame 352 was one of them.

Frame 61 is from Bill Munn's inventory of Cibachrome scans. There's a few more from that copy that I can post if you want.
Click to expand...

Why would I need to see any of that again?

Why would I need to discuss any of it any more?

What is the point of re-posting it?

It's all been discussed to death twice over and then some...

Why do you post it and act as if you just discovered it and we should all suddenly be amazed at bigfoot?
 
RayG said:
OS, do you consider the PGF the single best piece of evidence for the reality of bigfoot?

If not, what would that single best piece of evidence be?

RayG
Click to expand...

It could be the single best piece of evidence. It's either that or the various patterns that can be seen across thousands of reports.
 
OntarioSquatch said:
These are the two frames that convinced me she's real. You can see obvious signs of a biologically real hominid if you look carefully.

[qimg]http://i62.tinypic.com/2czoqpc.png[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/1JayLxS.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...
Oh yeah, just like this one...

buttcomp_zpsc0657892.gif
 
So funny, the Peterson Patterson-Gimlin film is still their best and freshest (scrutable) "evidence". Which only goes to show that apparently there's such low expectations amongst Bigfooters that Bigfoot would actually show up that the best "play" they've come up with to find the elusive Bigfoot is sitting here BLAARGUing with us as to why that's not true by constantly reminding us Bigfoot lives, but never showing us a Bigfoot that lives. It's funnily deranged.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom