Moderated JFK conspiracy theories: it never ends III

Status
Not open for further replies.
QUOTE=Robert Harris;10760615]

What I found interesting is that Ellsworth's story is a perfect match for the oft repeated claim that the police actually found a Mauser a the 6th floor.


Roger Craig was a Deputy Sheriff in Dallas. I've seen footage of him telling his story. Supposedly he survived one or two or more murder attempts, made after he began talking about what he knew of the JFK assassination and related issues contradicting the official story.

It was in the video video "Evidence of Revision" by John Hankey. Deputy Craig says a Mauser was found in the TSBD, and confirmed by another officer who was very familiar with rifles.

There is footage of the recognizable Dallas detectives finding a second rifle in the same video. I don't know which of these is true, or not.
 
Last edited:
In the video, one or more of the recognizable detectives with the white cowboy hats are seen (supposedly) finding a different rifle. One or more of the detectives are recognized in other footage, in the police dept.

In the video, that footage is linked with Roger Craig naming another officer expert in rifles who confirmed it was a Mauser, according to Craig.

I'd be surprised if this claim is news to anyone here. Is it?
 
Thanks.
I'll search there.

I wonder was that footage of the detectives holding a different rifle in the TSBD included in the debunking ?
 
Thanks.
I'll search there.

I wonder was that footage of the detectives holding a different rifle in the TSBD included in the debunking ?

Does the footage show the rifle in enough detail to actually make it out as a different rifle? The whole point of the debunking of the original claim is that it's easy to mis-identify an MC as a Mauser with only superficial examination. If your footage doesn't show the detail needed to pass "superficial," then it's included in the original debunking, and doesn't need another.
 
Last edited:
In the video, one or more of the recognizable detectives with the white cowboy hats are seen (supposedly) finding a different rifle. One or more of the detectives are recognized in other footage, in the police dept.

In the video, that footage is linked with Roger Craig naming another officer expert in rifles who confirmed it was a Mauser, according to Craig.

I'd be surprised if this claim is news to anyone here. Is it?

Craig unfortunately, was not a reliable source.

Long before he made statements about seeing the Mauser in great detail, he had told the LA Free Press that he had no idea what the make of the rifle was, and didn't get a good look at it.

I used to have a screen capture of the article but can't find it. McAdams has this at his website though.

FP: Did you handle that rifle?

RC: Yes, I did. I couldn't give its name because I don't know foreign rifles, I know it was foreign made, and you loaded it downward into a built-in clip. The ID man took it and ejected one live round from it. The scope was facing north, the bolt facing upwards and the trigger south.

But there was another rifle, a Mauser, found up on the roof of the depository that afternoon.

FP: A Mauser on the roof? Who found it?

PJ: I don't know who found it, but I do know that a police officer verified its existence.


I would add BTW, that if Ellsworth was correct, Oswald's rifle really was found in the depository, but on on the sixth floor.
 
Last edited:
The fact is, Robert's entire system revolves around the sun of his "startle reflexes"- without that, the entire thing goes spinning off into directionless space.

Why do you think that most of the witnesses only heard one of the early shots?

Did you think that 130 decibel, high powered rifle shots would be inaudible to the large majority of witnesses?

And why did no one exhibit visible startle reactions, to the early shots, that all began in the same 6th of one second, like the ones following 285 and 313 did?

Do you REALLY believe all of those shots came from the same weapon?

And do you think it is just a coincidence that the reactions of the limo passengers began at frame 290-292 and Dr. Alvarez identified Zapruder's startle reaction at 290-291?
 
Last edited:
In addition to the usual arguments about the identification of the rifle, ex ATF agent, Frank Ellsworth had some interesting things to say, about his experience, assisting in the search of the Depository. This is from "Oswald Talked", by Ray and Mary La Fontaine.

Former ATF agent Frank Ellsworth, who participated in a second search of the Book Depository conducted after 1:30p.m. on November 22, 1963, confirms that the Mannlicher-Carcano was found by a DPD detective on the fourth or fifth floor of the building, "not on the same floor as the cartridges". He adds: "I remember we talked about it, and figured that he (Oswald) must have run out from the stairwell, to the lower floor and dropped it as he was running downstairs."

I don't consider this absolute proof, but the source was a federal agent, and his recollections are consistent with the possibility that the first rifle found, was actually a Mauser.

It is also consistent with other witnesses who claimed to have seen another sniper on the same floor Oswald was on.

Please present the evidence that Ellsworth said he saw the rifle. The above quote does not establish that - it mentions only a conversation Ellsworth had with some other unnamed individual(s). You could be citing nothing more than a recollection of a conversation that Ellsworth had -- if that's the case, Ellsworth is simply repeating hearsay, not his own personal recollection.

You "don't consider this absolute proof" but you accept his recollection of a conversation he had over the documented evidence like photographs of the rifle in place taken by the Dallas Crime lab, and film of the search of the Depository taken by Thomas Alyea.

Both of which were examined extensively by the HSCA and used to validate the weapon recovered on the sixth floor as Oswald's.

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol6/html/HSCA_Vol6_0035a.htm
 
Craig unfortunately, was not a reliable source.

Long before he made statements about seeing the Mauser in great detail, he had told the LA Free Press that he had no idea what the make of the rifle was, and didn't get a good look at it.

I used to have a screen capture of the article but can't find it. McAdams has this at his website though.

https://app.box.com/s/n0hkvccua7iczh71h5bp

FP: Did you handle that rifle?

RC: Yes, I did. I couldn't give its name because I don't know foreign rifles, I know it was foreign made, and you loaded it downward into a built-in clip. The ID man took it and ejected one live round from it. The scope was facing north, the bolt facing upwards and the trigger south.

But there was another rifle, a Mauser, found up on the roof of the depository that afternoon.

FP: A Mauser on the roof? Who found it?

PJ: I don't know who found it, but I do know that a police officer verified its existence.


I would add BTW, that if Ellsworth was correct, Oswald's rifle really was found in the depository, but on on the sixth floor.

That conflicts with your version of events that you posted earlier, that a Mauser was found on the sixth floor and Oswald's weapon was found on a lower floor.

Pretty much you're all over the map.

Hank
 
Why do you think that most of the witnesses only heard one of the early shots?

Did you think that 130 decibel, high powered rifle shots would be inaudible to the large majority of witnesses?

And why did no one exhibit visible startle reactions, to the early shots, that all began in the same 6th of one second, like the ones following 285 and 313 did?

Do you REALLY believe all of those shots came from the same weapon?

And do you think it is just a coincidence that the reactions of the limo passengers began at frame 290-292 and Dr. Alvarez identified Zapruder's startle reaction at 290-291?

You are one of a kind, Bob- I don't think I've ever seen anybody respond to a point by so enthusiastically emphasizing it.
 
Robert, do you feel that you have enough evidence and that it's compelling enough to take to the FBI?

Well, that's the thing about CTists- they always feel their "evidence" is compelling enough to engage in endless (and circular) arguments on forums like these; but when it comes to the sticking point of presenting it in a forum that might result in action a little more concrete than just the argument, there's always an excuse not to.

I have to admit that I've actually developed a little bit of sneaking admiration for Robert, in his sheer persistence- you might even call it sincere dedication. The problem is that, to me, it looks like persistence for persistence's sake. I'm sure Robert himself feels that history will (eventually) vindicate him. I think he has to feel that- it's the last refuge of the sincerely self-righteous.
 
hsienzant

Hank offered a caveat that allows him time to check on his facts. At some point he can offer an apology or a citation.

You made a statement of fact with neither.

You both have a burden of proof. But one of you has a track record of making good on this thread and doesn't this pointing out to him.

No. As I said, I expect him to make good on his.

Alas your own statement has burdens of its own.

When I said

On the day of the assassination, Ellsworth was in Dealey Plaza as a civilian, as I recall.

I was thinking of James Powell, a military intelligence officer who was also in Dealey Plaza that day and who took the day off from work to observe the motorcade.

According to Dick Russell, in the MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH (p.568), Ellsworth was at his normal office job (at the ATF office in Dallas, "not far from Dealey Plaza"), he said, when he heard of the shooting over the radio. He had no assigned duties relating to the President's visit, thus, anything he did that day relative to the search was off-duty from his regular job.

Dick Russell says Ellsworth said, "...(I) got there the same time [Dallas Police Chief] Will Fritz did. He motioned me to follow him into the book depository. To my knowledge, I was the only federal officer in the building." (p.568).

Ellsworth also amazingly took credit for finding the sniper's nest: "I happened to be the individual who found where Oswald had done the shooting. There were a number of boxes over by the sixth-floor window, which appeared to have been the sniper's nest", according to the same book. (p 569), a claim by Ellsworth that is uncorroborated in the official record. Of course, there were boxes all about the sixth floor, which was used as a storage area by the Depository. Ellsworth isn't quoted as stating what indicated to him that the shooting had occurred at that window. He doesn't mention any shells he saw, or a rifle in that corner, for instance.

His recollection of being the person to find the sniper's nest is in conflict with the contemporaneous record, which indicates Luke Mooney found the sniper's nest, and bears all the earmarks of a false recollection.

Mooney: http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/mooney.htm

Of course, not only are memory issues common, so is inflating one's own importance in the story. We see that in both Ellsworth's claim of finding the sniper's nest, but also of possibly being the only federal officer in the building. According to Russell, "Frank Ellsworth was not the only federal official inside the TSBD. An Army Intelligence officer, special agent James Powell, was found trapped inside the TSBD after the building had been sealed." (p.569) (Ellsworth qualifies his claim with "to my knowledge").

Moreover, Ellsworth qualified his claims in his 1992 interview with Russell.

Russell quotes him as sounding unsure:

"If I recollect right, there was an elevator shaft or stairwell back in the northwest corner [it is, of course, a stairwell in that corner - Hank]. The gun was over near that, just south of it behind some boxes. I think the rifle was on the fourth floor. I have a vague recollection that the position it was in, and where it was found, led to the conjecture that as Oswald came down the stairs, he probably pitched it over behind these boxes."

Ellsworth never comes out and says he saw the rifle on the fourth or fifth floor to Russell either. He credits the discovery to others and never says he witnessed it:
"The gun was not found on the same floor, but on a lower floor by a couple of city detectives."

Hardly something I would want to stake my position on, but apparently Robert is perfectly okay with this 'evidence'. And utilizing to overturn the hard evidence like Oswald's rifle being found on the sixth floor.

Robert, simple question time: Can you establish there were boxes on the fourth floor (Ellsworth's best guess as to the floor), and that it was a wide-open storage space like the sixth floor, where the contemporaneous record puts the discovery of the rifle? If the rifle was found on the fourth floor as Ellsworth recalls, there would have to be boxes there, if you want to salvage Ellsworth's three-decade after the fact recollection.

Hank
 
Last edited:
That rifle footage:

Craig narrates Boone finding rifle, says "7.65 mauser stamped on barrel"
Craig's face is edited in, gets in the way partly.
Anyhow, who can say Craig's narration really matches the rifle in video?

Beginning at 9:11, Craig tells of Boone finding a rifle.
Evidence Of Revision - Part 1 - 3 of 10
https://www.youtube . com /watch?v=RIOnFpZaDcw
by youtuber awfultin

begin at 1:24
The depository revisited - Alyea#2
https://www.youtube . com /watch?v=-WQr4y1j4Gw
by youtuber 10Garmonbozia01

seen again in the first minute of this video
https://www.youtube . com /watch?v=mDAiC8Bb75M
by youtuber awfultin

After 0:19, this video claims difference in rifle sling in pic of LHO in backyard
https://www.youtube . com /watch?v=3v_9pOsRL0o
 
Last edited:
No. As I said, I expect him to make good on his.

Alas your own statement has burdens of its own.

When I said

On the day of the assassination, Ellsworth was in Dealey Plaza as a civilian, as I recall.

I was thinking of James Powell, a military intelligence officer who was also in Dealey Plaza that day.

Ellsworth was at his normal office job, he said, when he heard of the shooting over the radio. He had no assigned duties relating to the President's visit, thus, anything he did that day relative to the search was off-duty from his regular job.

According to Dick Russell, in the MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH, Ellsworth said, "... got there the same time [Dallas Police Chief] Will Fritz did. He motioned me to follow him into the book depository. To my knowledge, I was the only federal officer in the building." (p.568).

Ellsworth also amazingly took credit for finding the sniper's nest: "I happened to be the individual who found where Oswald had done the shooting. There were a number of boxes over by the sixth-floor window, which appeared to have been the sniper's nest", according to the same book. (p 569), a claim by Ellsworth that is uncorroborated by no one in the official record.

Of course, not only are memory issues common, so is inflating your own importance in the story.

His recollection of being the person to find the sniper's nest is in conflict with the contemporaneous record, which indicates Luke Mooney found the sniper's nest, and bears all the earmarks of a false recollection.

Mooney: http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/mooney.htm

Hank
 
That rifle footage:

Craig narrates Boone finding rifle, says "7.65 mauser stamped on barrel"
Craig's face is edited in, gets in the way partly.
Anyhow, who can say Craig's narration really matches the rifle in video?

Beginning at 9:11, Craig tells of Boone finding a rifle.
Evidence Of Revision - Part 1 - 3 of 10
https://www.youtube . com /watch?v=RIOnFpZaDcw
by youtuber awfultin

begin at 1:24
The depository revisited - Alyea#2
https://www.youtube . com /watch?v=-WQr4y1j4Gw
by youtuber 10Garmonbozia01

seen again in the first minute of this video
https://www.youtube . com /watch?v=mDAiC8Bb75M
by youtuber awfultin

After 0:19, this video claims difference in rifle sling in pic of LHO in backyard
https://www.youtube . com /watch?v=3v_9pOsRL0o

Is there a question in there? Surely you're not expecting to watch a host of youtube videos and rebut the claims therein. Are you?

Hank
 
Is there a question in there? Surely you're not expecting to watch a host of youtube videos and rebut the claims therein. Are you?

Hank

No, sorry I should've added that its less than one minute in each of the four videos.

Someone asked if the rifle was identifiable in the clips. I cannot answer that so I posted the clips.
 
No, sorry I should've added that its less than one minute in each of the four videos.

Someone asked if the rifle was identifiable in the clips. I cannot answer that so I posted the clips.

The Alyea film and the police evidence photos of the rifle, among many others of the rifle, were examined in 1978 by experts hired by the U.S.House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA).

They determined the rifle in question was Oswald's.

All that information is available to you online.

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/contents/hsca/contents_hsca_vols.htm

Specifically, here:

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol6/html/HSCA_Vol6_0035a.htm

I just cited this for Robert Harris.

Hank
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom