I'm a registered Republican and at least on Obama I have the same skewed view of reality as your daughter. I voted for him twice.
Even though I never voted for him, I'm still somewhat ridiculed at my family gatherings for saying I was hoping for the best after Obama's 1st win, so I don't fault you for your 1st vote.
But, we're not here to discuss Obama, who will surely go down in history as one of America's worst presidents.
It is interesting and a little sad that an apparently intelligent woman with such an unusually well informed and skillfully analytical father would come to such a conclusion.
My daughter (as with many people) can be intelligent in areas that interest her, but she probably couldn't tell you the name of America's current VP?
She wasn't that interested in the Amanda Knox case, so she was only knee-jerking.
She'll be here Friday (my B-day is July 4th) so I'll test her on Biden and report back.
The issue of why some people believe so strongly in the guilt of AK/RS is an interesting question to me. I think part of it is the routine conspiracy theory thing where people derive part of their ego from having specialized knowledge that leads to beliefs outside the norm. But confirmation bias and some kind of Knox hatred that I don't understand also seem to be drivers for the pro-guilt people.
A couple of questions:
1. Is some kind of Knox hatred really a significant driver of the pro-guilt group?
2. What is the basis for this anti-Knox hatred?
Dunno? Was it Bill Williams who said the other day that he had PM'd several 'Guilters' to see how they were ticking? I would like to see a discussion about that since some of these hard-core 'Guilters' seemed overly consumed and they must have spent most of their time over the last 7+ years posting their inane nonsense online - Harry Rag comes to mind as a classic 'Guilter' example.
Seriously, what drives them? Misogyny, anti-Americanism, or something else?
It would be interesting to learn something about these hard-core 'Guilter' radicals, which may be possible. After Amanda & Raffaele's exoneration on March 27th, anyone posting the same tired nonsense that they are nevertheless still guilty can be legally sued in America for libel (since they clearly are posting with 'MALICE'), and obviously that old 'Guilter' libel is still ongoing even today, but not as much on this forum lately.
Raffaele has stated that he will no longer tolerate being accused as being an assassin, so he may sue some of these 'Guilters'? Amanda likely just wants to put it behind her, so she may let some libel slide?
There really isn't any anonymity on the web - just file a lawsuit and name the 'Guilter' as a 'John Doe', and then ask the judge for an order to compel their ISP to turn over their name. I would love to know who Harry Rag really is?
If Amanda and/or Raffaele set up a donation site to support legal action against the trolls, then they'll get some money from me!