Continuation Part 16: Amanda Knox/Raffaele Sollecito

[Dan O.]

Certainly the body was moved. Blood splatter shows fatal wound was near the wardrobe (closet). Body moved 21" away. Police believed so it could not be seen from carpark.

You've mentioned this before. What line of sight would provide this view? Where in the room is the floor visible (as evidenced by press photos and deducable from google earth overview)?


Of course, there is evidence that the body was moved. It is in the blood trail. But who got blood on their hands as evidenced by the bloody palm print and their own statements? Who's pants were wet and needed to be covered by a sweatshirt when they left the cottage that night?

 

[Dan O.]

Wrong. It has a special price, which went up mid-October. However, that does not exclude it was bought 2nd Nov 2007. The bottles do exist.

You are pushing a lie. And you still haven't answered when the bleach was smelled in the appartment.

You really should work in that timeline. It might help you recognize the next stupid lie before you post it.

 

[Vixen]

You've mentioned this before. What line of sight would provide this view? Where in the room is the floor visible (as evidenced by press photos and deducable from google earth overview)?


Of course, there is evidence that the body was moved. It is in the blood trail. But who got blood on their hands as evidenced by the bloody palm print and their own statements? Who's pants were wet and needed to be covered by a sweatshirt when they left the cottage that night?

Who left a ladies size 37 shoeprint in blood near Mez' body? Who left a bloody "horror fingerprints signature" on the wall? Who left a bloody mark on the small bathroom lightswitch? Who left blood on the tap/faucet? Who left blood in the bidet? Who left diluted blood at base bathroom door? Who left luminol illuminated footprints identified as Raff's and Amanda's?

Enquiring minds need to know.

 

[Vixen]

You are pushing a lie. And you still haven't answered when the bleach was smelled in the appartment.

You really should work in that timeline. It might help you recognize the next stupid lie before you post it.

When the forensic cops headed by Edgardo Giobbi arrived, IIRC circa 5th/6th Nov.

 

[Vixen]

Are you suggesting that when women buy underwear they are in a state of euphoria? Your evidence for euphoria is the action of buying the underwear? I'm guessing she was probably happy to get some fresh clothes, but I hardly see that's got anything to do with evidence of a warped state of mind.

Post-murder witnesses and her diary entries ("I could write a song about this"; "I could kill for a pizza") testified Amanda was "off her head". Pulling faces at Raff, laughing, giggling, prancing about doing cartwheels and splits.

Behaviour is legally permissible evidence.

 

[MichaelB]

Who left a ladies size 37 shoeprint in blood near Mez' body? Who left a bloody "horror fingerprints signature" on the wall? Who left a bloody mark on the small bathroom lightswitch? Who left blood on the tap/faucet? Who left blood in the bidet? Who left diluted blood at base bathroom door? Who left luminol illuminated footprints identified as Raff's and Amanda's?

Enquiring minds need to know.

Sigh. Round and round you go. Wash, rinse, repeat.

 

[RoseMontague]

Who left a ladies size 37 shoeprint in blood near Mez' body? Who left a bloody "horror fingerprints signature" on the wall? Who left a bloody mark on the small bathroom lightswitch? Who left blood on the tap/faucet? Who left blood in the bidet? Who left diluted blood at base bathroom door? Who left luminol illuminated footprints identified as Raff's and Amanda's?

Enquiring minds need to know.

Enquiring minds should read the court documents, transcripts, and evidence files for the answers they are looking for.

There is no ladies size 37 shoeprint in blood on the pillow. It is clearly Rudy's. My guess is that the finger marks on the wall are Meredith's, the blood on the light switch also Merediths blood from Rudy turning on the light. The luminol footprints are mostly blobs and are not a match to anybody, the one exception being the footprint in Amanda's room that does not match Amanda.

What diluted blood at the "base bathroom door"? Is this a new one?

 

[RoseMontague]

Post-murder witnesses and her diary entries ("I could write a song about this"; "I could kill for a pizza") testified Amanda was "off her head". Pulling faces at Raff, laughing, giggling, prancing about doing cartwheels and splits.

Behaviour is legally permissible evidence.

Have you read the shopkeeper's actual testimony? (2nd time I have asked)

He reported her behavior was not unusual.

 

[Vixen]

The body was moved and positioned on the pillow by Rudy Guede shortly after the knife wound to the neck and then he raped the corpse.

In your mind.

 

[Vixen]

Meredith's window is in the back of the cottage and can't be seen from the carpark. Have you even looked at the photos of the cottage?

Really? Then why did Amanda claim in her round robin email home that she managed to creep along Mez' windowledge?

 

[Kauffer]

Post-murder witnesses and her diary entries ("I could write a song about this"; "I could kill for a pizza") testified Amanda was "off her head". Pulling faces at Raff, laughing, giggling, prancing about doing cartwheels and splits.

Behaviour is legally permissible evidence.

I thought we were talking about the underwear?

 

[MichaelB]

Really? Then why did Amanda claim in her round robin email home that she managed to creep along Mez' windowledge?

If you read the email you'll see she doesn't actually say what you claim.

http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/email.html

Then I knocked on Meredith's room. At first I thought she was asleep so I knocked gently, but when she didn't respond I knocked louder and louder until I was really banging on her door and shouting her name. No response. Panicking, I ran out onto our terrace to see if maybe I could see over the ledge into her room from the window, but I couldn't see in. Bad angle. I then went into the bathroom where I had dried my hair and looked really quickly into the toilet

We can play whack a mole all day long. Are you having fun?

 

[Vixen]

Have you read the shopkeeper's actual testimony? (2nd time I have asked)

He reported her behavior was not unusual.

Yes, I have. In which way can someone behave "unusually" in a shop? IIRC he did say he was surprised to find a student type up so early on a Bank Holiday waiting for the shop to open.

"Hi, my name is Amanda, and I am addicted to household cleaning. So much so, I queue up outside the grocery store before opening time to stock up with bleach."

"Welcome, Amanda. One day at a time, sweet Jesus".

 

[Vixen]

If you read the email you'll see she doesn't actually say what you claim.

http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/email.html



We can play whack a mole all day long. Are you having fun?

Thank you for the reference.

 

[Vixen]

I thought we were talking about the underwear?

You might be. I was referring to behaviour that could be perceived by some to be abnormal.

 

[Dan O.]

When the forensic cops headed by Edgardo Giobbi arrived, IIRC circa 5th/6th Nov.

You are wrong again Vixen. Read the testimony.

 

[Dan O.]

What diluted blood at the "base bathroom door"? Is this a new one?

It's another old lie that Vixen told before. She is referring to the drip of undiluted blood on the inside edge of the bathroom door visible in dsc_0199.jpg and dsc_0235.jpg.

 

[zotz]

You might be. I was referring to behaviour that could be perceived by some to be abnormal.

Hellmann: All the other elements against them were nonsense (sciocchezze, silly, of no value).

Vixen, much of your evidence could be perceived by some to be sciocchezze.

All students of this case need to learn that word.

 

[Dan O.]

Really? Then why did Amanda claim in her round robin email home that she managed to creep along Mez' windowledge?

She didn't. Why haven't you looked at the documentation for yourself?

 

[Ken Dine]

We can infer it was Amanda as when police asked her if anything was missing, she said, no, even though her room would have been dark without the lamp.

Amanda had a window in her bedroom, and when she returned to the cottage on Nov 2nd it was daytime. The girls used those lamps as study lights, but their bedrooms also had ceiling lights, so if Amanda did need more light she would have likely just flicked her bedroom's wall switch.

As for failing to notice that her study lamp was missing, Amanda had a lot going on that day distracting her. I do recall Amanda saying that she had left her rent money in a drawer in her bedroom, and that with all the confusion going on that day, that she never did check to see if her rent money was still there.

In court, Amanda went all the way around the houses before the judge squeezed it out of her it was her lamp on the floor, and which, incidentally, she and Raff could see through Mez' door keyhole!

Have you ever looked thru Meredith's keyhole before?

Do you have a citation which proves that Amanda was forced ("squeezed") to admit the lamp was hers?

Your proposition that anyone who wants to solve a crime must be a witch-hunting executioner, is the absurdest argument. I take it you never studied philosophy.

I've never claimed to have your uncanny ability to divine TRVTH out of thin air, so ya got me there.