We can surmise perp C (Rudy) forcibly restrained Mez by holding her hands behind her back, as evidenced by bruising to Mez forearms and elbows, and perp C's DNA on Mez' sweatshirt cuffs. Someone pulled out huge chunks of Mez' hair.
No, someone didn't. Where's the evidence - either in the form of missing "huge chunks" of Kercher's (not Mez's, and definitely not Mez') hair noted at autopsy, or in the form of "huge chunks" of Kercher's hair found at the crime scene or elsewhere?
Bruises around Mez' lower cheek and jaw line had bruises consistent with a perp with female sized hands.
It's impossible to determine the size of the hand that made those contusions.
From facial swelling, she was no doubt punched in the face.
Yes, she was.
There were 43 bruises and nicks, in addition to the 4 neck stabs crossing over on her left and right side of neck, approached from opposing directions and with different knives, so we can infer perp A and B wielded one each, unless perp C had six arms, like some latter day Vishnu or Shiva (?) as he was sexually assaulting Mez at the same time.
Firstly, the stab wounds are included in the 43 total. Secondly, this total includes every single mark on the body found at autopsy. As has been pointed out many times before, it's a huge mistake to conclude that all of these marks must necessarily have been inflicted during the attack and murder. For example, Kercher had been at a rowdy, crowded party the night before, and had had a great deal of alcohol to drink, so it's entirely reasonable to think that she might have accumulated some small bruises or marks from jostling people or fixtures/fittings. I am guessing that if you did a proper forensic examination of your own entire body right now, you'd find at least several small marks or bruises.
Secondly, it's utterly erroneous to state that the knife wounds were made from opposing directions with different knives. In fact, the knife wounds are totally compatible with being made by one person (situated behind Kercher and reaching round her from behind) with one small, narrow-bladed knife. Your "inference" is risibly incorrect.
The lady's size footprint in blood indicates at least one perp was female.
Completely incorrect. The shoe print was adequately shown to have been an embarrassing error on the part of the "crack" footprint analysis police team. And the blurry smudges revealed by Luminol in the hallway could just as easily have been deposited either before or after the murder (and, incidentally, are in themselves categorical proof that the hallway floor was not mopped down).
One perp, C (Rudy) left African hair, one perp left chestnut hair, and one left fair hair.
Completely incorrect. There was apparently an African hair found on the windowsill of Romanelli's room, but it strangely went missing and was never analysed or entered into evidence. There was a light fibre found attached to Kercher's hand, but likewise it strangely went missing and was never analysed or entered into evidence. The other hair was very likely Kercher's, though it too was never analysed or entered into evidence.
As DNA, footprint, cellphone, location, confession, circumstances (lack of alibi) and behaviour; together with the fact of Amanda's DNA on the handle of the murder weapon and Mez DNA on the blade, prosecutors were able to build a case Amanda was in their view the Svengali figure who wielded the fatal blow, possibly to silence Mez' scream, which by her own account she witnessed, with perps C and B as the spineless low life characters in her thrall.
Interesting use of florid language. And all of these items of "evidence" can be satisfactorily shown to be either inherently unreliable, subject to misinterpretation by prosecutors and certain courts (whether willful or not....), or simply plain wrong.
Matteini and Micheli didn't spell it out, but implied Rudy was an accessory, rather than the main killer. Matteini remanded both Amanda and Raf in custody, as being highly dangerous.
Pretty much every single part of Mignini's argument to Matteini regarding Knox and Sollecito subsequently turned out to be either a gross distortion or entirely wrong.
