Bill and others have expressed little interest in continuing to explore what really happened in various aspects. As was discussed at other times some were advocates for the kids innocence and had emotional connection to the kids and I'm guessing the verdict completes the case for them.
I have been convinced since reading the police chief's comments the day after arrest that something was rotten in Perugia. When Patrick was cleared the feeling intensified. The detail of how badly the DNA evidence was handled took some time to become clear.
One of the oddest aspects for me was the defense both legal and PR argued it had to be Rudi as the "lone wolf". Obviously if the kids could be suspects as accomplices and leave no evidence in the murder room then so could someone else. It was noted early on that evidence of unidentified people was found. IIRC both DNA and fingerprints were found.
I have wondered if the semen stain was from an unidentified man which would thrown a wrench in the gears of the prosecution's theory.
Koko was established to be there from phone records IIRC. What was he doing there? Did he know Rudi? Did they work at the same place for a time?
I am not sure I can speak for others, but it has not been an emotional interest for me. Truly, every time I've tried to go down the route of solving the minutiae of the case, it's been like descending into a rabbit hole.
One of the "various aspects of the case" which is worth exploring, obviously, is the events in Rudy's life which ended up in sexual assault and murder at the cottage in Nov 2007. Perhaps Nina Burleigh is a prime source in that, but you, Grinder, have obviously done background stuff to "fact-check" her claims. But suffice it to say that she spent the time writing a book, and you spend the time here on ISF pursuing this and the two of you, apparently, have the horsepower to see it through.
The verdict does not complete the case. As noted by others there is the ECHR which some claim will start the reversal of the calunnia against Knox. There are the satellite cases against Knox, her parents, Raffaele and (heck, even) Frank Sfarzo. Unknown at this time is if folk like Mignini and Stefanoni will feel the sting and peculiarities of Italian law, where three compatibilities against them will equal a judicial fact!
And there is the Marasca report due in a couple of weeks. If people listen to Peter Quennell, the TJMK moderator is now predicting some agency will intervene and overturn the March 2015 annulment of Nencini and exoneration of the kids.
Some of that stuff I can handle. On the other, more arcane stuff it feels a lot like being 75 rows up in the bleachers. Truly, I (for one) do not really know what to make of the days leading up to his barbaric actions, Rudy I mean.
As DougM as said upthread, that's probably a worthy road to go down to figure it all out. But it does not change much of import on the main issues.
