• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bigfoot Follies: part deux

Status
Not open for further replies.
Resume said:
That's right, it fell out of his clothing; the correct reaction, then, would be to eat it.
Click to expand...

We did think of that, but he was sitting in his camp chair with his back touching the backrest, leaning back and not moving. We did drop tests to see if the sound I heard could have been from it falling off his pants and it wasn't loud enough. It was only loud enough for what I heard when Ed dropped it while standing over the chair holding his arm up as high as possible.
 
Northern Lights said:
We did think of that, but he was sitting in his camp chair with his back touching the backrest, leaning back and not moving. We did drop tests to see if the sound I heard could have been from it falling off his pants and it wasn't loud enough. It was only loud enough for what I heard when Ed dropped it while standing over the chair holding his arm up as high as possible.
Click to expand...
Who says the sound you heard was caused by the piece of candy? Lots of stuff falls out of the trees in the woods. Including nuts, drupes, seeds, fruits, leaves, branches, leaners, whole trees, stuff squirrels drop, squirrel ****, nestlings, **** folks throw . . . like that.
 
Last edited:
Northern Lights said:
So are you going to shell out the roughly $7500 it will take to do a full genome sequence when I get a sample?

https://www.genome.gov/images/content/cost_genome.jpg
Click to expand...

No, keep spending tons of money on everything but DNA tests of samples...

It's not like there's a funds shortage for bigfoot projects.

I'm sure you could get $7,500 in donations with a good story.

I feel certain that you are a better salesman than Biscardi or Dyer.

Plus, you will likely be honest about having a sample you'd like to get tested, even if you are wrong.

See the difference? Chris tells us he has a sample, but he refuses to go any further. Chris also claims situations where he should have had a good saliva sample, but didn't bother.

I don't think you'll act like that.
 
Northern Lights said:
We did think of that, but he was sitting in his camp chair with his back touching the backrest, leaning back and not moving. We did drop tests to see if the sound I heard could have been from it falling off his pants and it wasn't loud enough. It was only loud enough for what I heard when Ed dropped it while standing over the chair holding his arm up as high as possible.
Click to expand...

I'm a bit confused by the effort taken with the candy piece.

Wasn't bigfoot nearby?
 
The Shrike said:
^Therefore, bigfoot.
Click to expand...

This picture was taken a couple of years later, but it shows where it came from. The fire was between the trees on the left and although you can't tell, it drops off right after the trees slopping down a good ways.

Dan was sitting facing the fire, I was on his left, Mary on his right. Turn the chair in the picture toward the trees and move it a little closer and that is just about where he was sitting. Considering Dan said he saw it through the light of the fire, it had to have come from between the trees. There weren't any squirrels or other rodents scurrying through the trees.

picture.php
 
Northern Lights said:
Dan was sitting facing the fire, I was on his left, Mary on his right. Turn the chair in the picture toward the trees and move it a little closer and that is just about where he was sitting. Considering Dan said he saw it through the light of the fire, it had to have come from between the trees. There weren't any squirrels or other rodents scurrying through the trees.
Click to expand...
None of this, even if accurate, justifies a footie conclusion.

Plus, no offense, but your claim of no squirrels scurrying around rings a bit hollow, as you folks can't find a 6-foot monkey living in patches of second (or perhaps third) growth popple woods.
 
LTC8K6 said:
No, keep spending tons of money on everything but DNA tests of samples...

It's not like there's a funds shortage for bigfoot projects.

I'm sure you could get $7,500 in donations with a good story.

I feel certain that you are a better salesman than Biscardi or Dyer.

Plus, you will likely be honest about having a sample you'd like to get tested, even if you are wrong.

See the difference? Chris tells us he has a sample, but he refuses to go any further. Chris also claims situations where he should have had a good saliva sample, but didn't bother.
I don't think you'll act like that.
Click to expand...

Since you rang, I will say that once I acquire a confirmed DNA sample from a Bigfoot, I certainly won't be sending it out to an anonymous forum member. LMAO. Likewise, I will not send a possibly yet unknown to be valid sample out either and I wouldn't suggest anyone else would.

I suggest anyone that has a sample they know to be valid as collected from a Bigfoot, to hand deliver the sample to a reputable lab and establish a confirmed chain of custody. Likewise said lab should sign an NDA for the results of any testing done from the sample before taking possession of it. People tend to get greedy when in possession of something that will turn modern science on its head. The acquisition of fame and fortune does strange things to alot of folks.
Chris B.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
People tend to get greedy when in possession of something that will turn modern science on its head. The acquisition of fame and fortune does strange things to alot of folks.
Chris B.
Click to expand...
Except for you, of course.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Since you rang, I will say that once I acquire a confirmed DNA sample from a Bigfoot, I certainly won't be sending it out to an anonymous forum member. LMAO. Likewise, I will not send a possibly yet unknown to be valid sample out either and I wouldn't suggest anyone else would.

I suggest anyone that has a sample they know to be valid as collected from a Bigfoot, to hand deliver the sample to a reputable lab and establish a confirmed chain of custody. Likewise said lab should sign an NDA for the results of any testing done from the sample before taking possession of it. People tend to get greedy when in possession of something that will turn modern science on its head. The acquisition of fame and fortune does strange things to alot of folks.
Chris B.
Click to expand...


How about addressing this post Chris? It's time to fess up, or put up. I suspect excuses are quick to follow...
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
That is correct. Chris B.
Click to expand...

Yes, much in the same way you aren't subject to other human foibles/behavior like pareidolia, memory biases, confirmation biases, etc.

The rest of the world si, Chris B., claro que no.

BS, or perhaps Chris BS.
 
River said:
How about addressing this post Chris? It's time to fess up, or put up. I suspect excuses are quick to follow...
Click to expand...

Now River, first of all I've previously covered that question multiple times in various threads. So why waste the bandwidth by asking the same thing again? You and others here have already said multiple times the only things I have taken pics and video of are shadows and sticks. It's only my imagination remember? Pareidolia right? Or are you second guessing your previous opinions?
Chris B.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom