• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let us call "unfounded generalisations" "hypothesises".
1 Only employees of different professions and different skills that have an hour wage and earn according their working hours are interesting me.
2 It is clear that the higher skill of time working employees the more hours of work in a year he need to to keep his skills up to date.
3 It is clear that in the most cases the quantity of those working hours in a year is much less than the average quantity of working hours in a year.

My hypothesis that for high skilled employees such as a software developer, designer, engineer, doctors, teachers 400 - 600 working hours in a year is enough to keep their skills up to date.
For skilled workers 300 - 400 working hours in a year is enough.
For unskilled workers 0 - 200 working hours in a year is enough.
Let us presume that the percentage of earning according their working time peaople from all employees is 80%.
To give those people the ideal life conditions we have to give them only those numbers of working hours in a year but with the same real earning they have now.
My Global Social Project "New Saturday" gives this ability.
So given my answer here - how does this change my life?
 
Let us call "unfounded generalisations" "hypothesises".
1 Only employees of different professions and different skills that have an hour wage and earn according their working hours are interesting me.
2 It is clear that the higher skill of time working employees the more hours of work in a year he need to to keep his skills up to date.
3 It is clear that in the most cases the quantity of those working hours in a year is much less than the average quantity of working hours in a year.

My hypothesis that for high skilled employees such as a software developer, designer, engineer, doctors, teachers 400 - 600 working hours in a year is enough to keep their skills up to date.
For skilled workers 300 - 400 working hours in a year is enough.
For unskilled workers 0 - 200 working hours in a year is enough.
Let us presume that the percentage of earning according their working time peaople from all employees is 80%.
To give those people the ideal life conditions we have to give them only those numbers of working hours in a year but with the same real earning they have now.
My Global Social Project "New Saturday" gives this ability.

Your project doesn't give "this ability". Just because you write something and present it, doesn't mean it's a good or even workable idea. What you are presenting is not enough productivity for any employer to be able to afford the salaries you are talking about. While on the one had this is sort of comical because it will never happen. On the other, I find it chilling that you would destroy the world economy and plunge us into a war for nothing more than your own vanity.
 
OK - I'm a database developer / administrator. I need to work around 1200 hours a year to maintain / develop the systems I work with. From your post here http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=10657427#post10657427 I should have 3-400 hours to keep my skills up to date. This brings me back to an annual figure of 1700 hours. Oddly enough - this is the approximate number of hours I work.

I principally do not want to go inside your real job functions.
Presume please that somebody else can replace you in your job place when you are absent.
Than write this sentence and in the place of 3 points write your figures.
"To keep my professional skills I need to work minimum.... hours a year."
 
I principally do not want to go inside your real job functions.
Presume please that somebody else can replace you in your job place when you are absent.
Than write this sentence and in the place of 3 points write your figures.
"To keep my professional skills I need to work minimum.... hours a year."

1400, Easy.

What do I win?
 
That ship has sailed.

Those 2 weeks I was in Jerusalem and in Tel-Aviv after 9 months of break.
People from the center of those cities remember me and spoke with me very friendly and with big interest.
Now they have a great ability to read on my front page the concept of my "New Saturday" project and on my back page the concept of my "To eat only in the 7th Day lifestyle".
I sleep in the afternoon in the parks or beaches and all other time I have interesting talkings with different people.
I need not spend money because I need not eat 6 days a week.
I do not need even a backpack because all my needful things are in the pockets of my pants and jacket.
The trip from Dimona to Jerusalem and back costs me $ 21 and to the Tel-Aviv $ 15.
To the ordinary person those trips will cost not less than $ 500.
 
My good luck hat ... Given to me by a CIA guy as we went in for a special mission in Cambodia. I have the hat to this day
--John Kerry

I am in the center of Jerusalem.
There are many different people and many of them have different hats.
I am absolutely sure that if they will buy even hats from the great hat designers all people will put attention only on my "The kippah of New Sabbath", because hundreds of friendly questions in the streets about my hat.
And the same situation surely will be in London, New-York or Paris.
 
No, unfounded generalization is much more accurate.

The bases of my hypothesis are my good working systems I have designed which.
For example "To eat only in the 7th Day lifestyle".
The man with inductive mind can understand me better than the man with deductive mind.
 
Originally Posted by TriangleMan View Post
If Hebrew is the language of God, why did He reveal the Qur'an in Arabic?
Because the Holy Language was already died in the Chosen People for about 1100 years in the time when God has given Quran on Arabic.


And if you are spelling it God, not G-d, then presumably you accept Christianity (although that's not certain), so why did the Logos choose to use the Greek translation of Hebrew, the LXX?

Anyway, modern Hebrew is different than ancient Hebrew, although they are closely related. The grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary differs in major ways. Modern Hebrew has Germanic, Aramaic, Yiddish, and even some Arabic influences.
Never mind.
The main fact that the secular jew from Israel to whom so called Modern Hebrew is native can read and understand The Book of Book in original.
It proves that we in Holy Resurrected Israel speak on Holy Resurrected Language.
I believe that God has resurrected it in His Chosen People not only for jews but for every secular and clerical God Believers.
 
The Logos was so enamoured of LXX that It even replicated errors in that translation.

The day of the translation the Tanah on Greek language is the day of mourning for the Jews of the same level as the ninth of ava - the Day of the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple.
The Holy Language was already died in the Chosen People.
In another case all Christians and than Muslims would learned the Holy Language of their God.
Even Christ spoke on Aramaic but not on the Holy Language.
 
I principally do not want to go inside your real job functions.
Presume please that somebody else can replace you in your job place when you are absent.
Than write this sentence and in the place of 3 points write your figures.
"To keep my professional skills I need to work minimum.... hours a year."

You are asking for an meaningless metric. We all work more than the minimum number of hours to keep our skills up. There wouldn't be any point in having a job where all you did was keep your skills up to date. No one is going to pay you to just maintain proficiency.
 
So given my answer here - how does this change my life?

Let us presume that for example it is clear for you that to keep for sure your professional skills it is enough you 400 hours of work in a year.
You really work 1700 hours in a year.
So your ideal goal have to be to work 400 hours in a year for the same money you earn in 1700 hours of work in a year.
Of course you can't solve this problem alone.
But all society can and should solve this type of problems.
Today your hour wage 20% from your GDP per hour.
But 100 year ago your hour wage could be 85% - 90% from your GDP per hour.
So we have to restore the same percentage and to give you to work near 400 hours a year.
The implementation of my project gives ability to every person of developed countries to work not more than it need him for keeping for sure his professional skills and for same wage he has now.
 
Your project doesn't give "this ability". Just because you write something and present it, doesn't mean it's a good or even workable idea. What you are presenting is not enough productivity for any employer to be able to afford the salaries you are talking about. While on the one had this is sort of comical because it will never happen. On the other, I find it chilling that you would destroy the world economy and plunge us into a war for nothing more than your own vanity.

When the person that likes freedom works more hours a year that are enough him to keep for sure his professional skills he must feel discomfortable and depression.
According my project the person has work 1248 hours a year.
If for example he has 3 professions and it is enough him 400 hours to keep his professional skills, he has to work on 3 job places 416 on each of them.
The average hour wage have to be not less than 85% from GDP per hour.
Every employee has to know his GDP per hour.
 
When the person that likes freedom works more hours a year that are enough him to keep for sure his professional skills he must feel discomfortable and depression.
According my project the person has work 1248 hours a year.
If for example he has 3 professions and it is enough him 400 hours to keep his professional skills, he has to work on 3 job places 416 on each of them.
The average hour wage have to be not less than 85% from GDP per hour.
Every employee has to know his GDP per hour.

Yeah, this will destroy the world economy. Nowhere near enough productivity to maintain the GDP at that amount. The learning of Hrbrew and headquarters in Jerusalem will plung us into a war. Your idea has nothing to recommend it and it's good it will never happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom