RoseMontague
Published Author
Police claim they could not find these letters - AF - Rudy claimed to have written.
They are pretty good at finding lost dogs. Evidence, not so much.
Police claim they could not find these letters - AF - Rudy claimed to have written.
She claims to have got up 10:00 ish, went to the cottage, had shower, hairwash, hairdry, put on "new clothes", claimed to be going to Gubbio, strolled back, told Raf after breakfast her "concerns". Rang Mez. Rang Filomena, circa 12:07, claimed to be at cottage, but actually phone records showed she was at Raf's. Filomena urged Amanda to ring Mez. Amanda omitted to inform Filomena she already had. Rang Filomena again 12:34- ish. Filomena urged her to call the police. Postal police turned up they say 12:35, but let's give slack, and say 12:45. Raf calls his sister circa 12:47. She says, call the police. Amanda rings Mum, Edda, 12:57. Raf rings police at last between 12:47- 12:58. Door kicked down by Filomena's sister's boyfriend, Luca as soon as they arrive, 13:05. Carabinieri turn up circa 13:26, "within half an hour", as promised. Postal police report washing machine just finishing cycle and the pair had a mop, on their arrival.
NB: this is from memory, so do check times for yourself.
Vixen,As for Lindy Chamberlain, as that seems to be a favourite analogy. Given Chamberlain, an extreme 7th Day Adventist (cf the guy leading the Waco cult, David Somebody) gave her daughter the biblical name of a character to be slaughtered in sacrifice to God*, and she claimed her daughter was carried off by a dingo, the police were right to be suspicious IMV.
*Sacrifice was a very ancient Hebrew custom. Some claim early Hebrew manuscripts (in the then language of Aramaic) revealed Abraham actually did slaughter Isaac. After which, God was happy with a ram instead.
Nope. No mop, no warm washing machine. Amanda calls Meredith's other phone (she had 2 cell phones) after her first try.
The real question is, will Vixen actually reexamine her position with all the corrected information or just move on and start spouting other discredited guilter points. I'm betting on the latter.
Migi asked both cops in court about the washing machine. They didn't even check it. From what I remember, the cops didn't check the washing machine until a couple of days had passed.
But when did framing begin if at all. No one here believes the interrogation was properly done and moist everyone thinks she should have been afforded an attorney well before she made her statement.
Did they frame? If yes, when did it start?
Those bank records were recently posted here for you, and, in light of what they actually reveal, what you say is - surprise - speculative nonsense.
However, to indulge your line of "thought" for a moment, let's further speculate that Ms. Knox accompanied her voluminous drug intake with some magic serum that later foiled ILE blood and urine tests. Assuming there was a long background to this behavior, how do you suppose she managed to stay on the dean's list at a competitive school like the University of Washington? Where are the sources from Ms. Knox's peers to corroborate such an intake of drugs? Meanwhile, her grades - and subsequent graduation and fledgling career as a junior reporter - are unambiguous.
She had 4000 dollars or more. She was withdrawing 250 Euro and once 500.
Please provide the proof on the calls both that they were made and that he was her drug dealer.
I thought she was buying from Rudi according to your theory.
What drugs was she buying and did she test positive?
Anyone feel free as the V won't answer in an acceptable fashion.
You do seem to be absolutely at ease with constructing hypotheticals from a standpoint of apparent abject ignorance. Coming from a self-proclaimed MENSA member, this is concerning.
David Koresh promoted principals and behaviors having nothing to do with the tenets of 7th Day Adventists. The preposterous connection you make between Koresh in Texas and the circumstances of Lindy Chamberlain - which transpired more than a decade earlier - in Australia indicates a highly imprecise and problematic mode of reasoning and connection-making.
Consider putting down your rhetorical shotgun and pause for a moment to meditate on the virtues of marksmanship.
I can quote you a newspaper article as far back as 2007/2008 re the drugdealer phone calls. However, posters here claim the TIMES (Richard Owen) is not an acceptable source.
It's interesting, the same story popped up again last year, naming the drugdealer as Federico Martini (Mattini?), a very nasty character indeed.
The €4K was supposed to last four months or more.
My problem with your questions are: 1. How are you defining "frame" - does your definition require that the police believe that the persons being framed are innocent;
The "to make" indicates willful. But if you think an addition is necessary
To purposely make a person appear as the perpetrator of a crime that he/she did not commit.
I can quote you a newspaper article as far back as 2007/2008 re the drugdealer phone calls. However, posters here claim the TIMES (Richard Owen) is not an acceptable source.
It's interesting, the same story popped up again last year, naming the drugdealer as Federico Martini (Mattini?), a very nasty character indeed.
The €4K was supposed to last four months or more.
The €4K was supposed to last four months or more.
Next, we need to understand why Amanda and Raf were framed, and how.
Vixen,
The name Azaria means helped by God or blessed of God. Michael Chamberlain was a minister in the Seventh Day Adventist church and later wrote a doctoral thesis at the University of Newcastle about one aspect of the church. The link between this church and David Koresh is pretty tenuous; according to Wikipedia "In 1982, he [Koresh] moved to Waco, Texas, where he joined the Branch Davidians, a religious group originating from a schism in 1955 from the Shepherd's Rod, themselves disfellowshipped members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church in 1929."
The real question is, will Vixen actually reexamine her position with all the corrected information or just move on and start spouting other discredited guilter points? I'm betting on the latter.
p
I read Lindy Chamberlain's book in her own words, and that was the police view.
Personally, I think they got "Azaria" mixed up with Azalia (_sp?).
In any case, when a mountaineer fell to his death at the spot near Ayers Rock, they found the baby's matinee jacket near a dingo lair, at the location they found the body. This was 2012, and Lindy was pardoned.
The baby's body was never found.
Citation, please, the pair were drug tested immediately after the murder, or please provide earliest date this was done.
Raf by his own account was "an extensive drug user", who had dabbled in hash, cocaine and acid, and had grappled with mental illness (depression).