There is a subset of ISF members, and one of them will soon send all this to Abandon All Hope. It seems this cartwheel thread is on lifetime parole.In my world people get arrested for misdemeanours of this type all the time.
There is a subset of ISF members, and one of them will soon send all this to Abandon All Hope. It seems this cartwheel thread is on lifetime parole.In my world people get arrested for misdemeanours of this type all the time.
Numbers'
I have always been puzzled about the storage of the clasp. On the one hand, it is difficult not to conclude that it was deliberately stored in a way that would virtually ensure its decay. On the other hand, I don't see how one might have been able to determine incompetence or malfeasance by reexamination of a hypothetically properly stored clasp. Suppose that one had swabbed it for DNA and come up empty. The previous workers could claim that they they had already extracted all of the DNA that there was. Finding even additional profiles could be handwaved away, just as the extra profiles that are already known are handwaved away in pro-guilt arguments. In other words, if it were tampered with at the time of storage, it probably was not done by someone with much knowledge of forensics.
Amanda thinks there "might have been an intruder" but doesn't even mention it to Raf until over an hour later, after breakfast?
I thought after you read my expert comment, with quote that rigor would have fully set in by then, you see that temp 8 hours or more after death in uncertain temperature conditions would have precluded the test making a significant difference in TOD estimate accuracy.
I must admit I am now totally confused by that Casablanca line, the meaning is obscure, and I don't expect to deconstruct it tonight.Really? You know when one is close to another nicknames are just fine and I call Numbers Number at times.
I can come up with a bunch of evidence absent theories too. You are telling a story, a fiction, which omits an appreciation of known facts. Not even Richard Owens' reports allow for your fantasy.
You also have to take into account the misapplication of the luminol - seems like they used too much of it, which would've further diluted the samples available for TMB testing.
There's certainly an argument that if a TMB test is negative, then the default assumption should be that no blood is present. So from a legal point of view, and in terms of the usability of the evidence, it doesn't seem unreasonable that the footprints be discounted.
But in terms of what is actually likely to have made them, Amanda stepping on the bloody bathmat that morning does seem like the most obvious explanation, doesn't it? I mean, if you knew nothing except that those prints had been found, it's the one explanation that fits with what we know. I could never figure out how Massei was able to suggest that the prints were made in diluted blood residue after someone had cleaned their feet of blood, without it being really obvious to him that stepping on the bathmat as Amanda says she did would've produced exactly the same result - almost as if he was inviting the defence to make that argument.
I don't see how we can conceive of the manufacturing of a dilution so dilute as to escape TMB notice. Aren't we talking, even in terms favourable to a pro blood hypothesis, of half a thimble of blood per bathful of water?
As far as evidence in the case is concerned, we are asked to consider that the failure to complete the investigation into the possible presence of dilute blood in the hallway together with the suggestion of the botching of the luminol application, has created doubt, which the prosecution must be allowed to benefit from! No! It is manifestly unfair.
But whether or not rigor set in depends on several factors, including the room ambient temperature and the covering over the body, and the ambient temp depends on the whether or not there was heating. So it is indeed possible that rigor had set in.
'Raps' thanks (your card has been marked).
You are incredulous about things that are perfectly credible. That's assuming what you say happened is actually claimed by Amanda and/or Raf. If it is so what? What had really happened was far from being the most likely thing. Even the posties didn't freak out and they knew about the tossed phones, which Amanda and Raf did not at the time we are speaking about. This is a non-point. Move on.
Why would the posties "freak out"? They are hardly the sharpest cards in the pack.
My view is yes. Assuming Knox is innocent this would be normal behaviour to go back to your own flat for a shower after spending the night with your boyfriend. I think the faint luminal positive marks in the hall way may be from Knox stepping on the blood stained bathmat with damp feet, then walking down the hall. There are are other possible explanations for these marks. E.g. bleach based shower cleaner.
Why would the posties "freak out"? They are hardly the sharpest cards in the pack.
You could, from the initial contact. Try it, dab your fingers in powder or something that will show up, and then dab them on a wall, or paper extended in front of you. You'll see it matches your finger profile.
The victim would reach out a hand directly in front, presumably to stabilise themselves. A show off perp finger painting in the victim's blood, which looks like the case here, would probably extend their arm above shoulder height.
I can't tell the height from the photo, but it was clearly done by someone fully standing up, and looks left-handed to me.
He entered the room in which the dead girl was lying on the floor, almost entirely covered by a duvet, leaving visible only "a part of the head stained with blood and the left foot, which was sticking out from the lower edge of the duvet" (page 2 of the report). He did not do any tests, as he had been asked to preserve the crime scene as perfectly as possible in order to allow the scientific police to carry out their work.
110
[103] However, he did note (at around 14:40 or 15:00 pm) that the girl's foot presented "cadaveric rigidity...of the ankle and the toes" (page 6, hearing of April 3, 2009).
rig·or mor·'tisstiffening of the body, 1-7 hours after death, from hardening of the muscular tissues as a consequence of the coagulation of the myosinogen and paramyosinogen; it disappears after 1-6 days or when decomposition begins.
Synonym(s): cadaveric rigidity, postmortem rigidity
At the time of death, a condition called "primary flaccidity" occurs. Following this, the muscles stiffen in rigor mortis. All muscles in the body are affected. Starting between two to six hours following death, rigor mortis begins with the eyelids, neck, and jaw. The sequence may be due to different lactic acid levels among different muscles, which is directly related to the difference in glycogen levels and different types of muscle fibers. Rigor mortis then spreads to the other muscles within the next four to six hours, including the internal organs. The onset of rigor mortis is affected by the individual's age, sex, physical condition, and muscular build. Rigor mortis may not be perceivable in many infant and child corpses due to their smaller muscle mass
ETA - rigor had set in and he did feel the body temp and could tell she had been dead for some time. The ICSI came from Rome and didn't arrive until 7 pm. Is it standard policy to send the Rome team out or did Mignini decide that would be the way to delay and therefore give him more latitude to frame the kids?
Interesting metaphor.
They had the phone information added to an already odd situation including the locked door. A couple of blood drops. the broken window, the locked door and now the phones yet the PP weren't "on the case" immediately but the PGP roundly flames Amanda about not freaking out without having the phones.
These cops started the burglary was staged meme.
I must admit I am now totally confused by that Casablanca line, the meaning is obscure, and I don't expect to deconstruct it tonight.
That's not exactly right. Battistelli took a look at Filomena's room and said, "This is no burglary," which it wasn't. At that time before opening Meredith's door, Battistelli could have meant many things....
That's not exactly right. Battistelli took a look at Filomena's room and said, "This is no burglary," which it wasn't. At that time before opening Meredith's door, Battistelli could have meant many things....