Pixel42
Schrödinger's cat
Great. Now all you need is an objective test protocol whose results are self evident. That means no alternative explanation of the result other than that your claim is true, no-one's personal judgement of what that result is required.It's a challenge I'm willing to take from start to finish, and see how it plays out (Under strict observing conditions) I've done enough practice and it's been costly. I've presented the JREF with some media coverage, and had the GP involved with a mini diamond test, in order for him to feel confident enough to write a letter to support my taking this challenge.
You consider a well known, well understood and easily demonstrated phenomenon, a natural result of evolved cognitive biases, stranger than "spirits" which have never been demonstrated to exist communicating with you in a ridiculous fashion to no apparent purpose? Seriously?The voices that emit my PC, can hold short conversation when working with vibration. I understand this can be considered pareidolia, despite the sense these "short conversations" reveal. Which I understand can be considered a delusion, despite these words correlating to their actions. I actually find it more strange that folk expect me to believe it's just "noise"
It could also be considered normal wear and tear, or deliberately induced damage, or a belated noticing of something that was there all along. Those are the alternative explanations your test protocol needs to eliminate.Altering the insides of a diamond, by a big increase of black carbon, and possible fractures (by wear) is more straight forward and cannot be considered anything but paranormal (Or a delusion)