• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Continuation Part 14: Amanda Knox/Raffaele Sollecito

Status
Not open for further replies.
Clearly you are trying to be funny. I always thought you might secretly be a Innocentisti parodying a guilter. Good on you. The whole Mensa thing was great too.

Same thought. Is there an unmensa?

ETA - I don't believe I've seen the spiteful or quarrelsome woman and Anglo online at the same time.
 
Last edited:
Because what one does with one's phone is a matter too trivial to be worth committing firmly to memory -- unless of course it forms part of your murder plot, in which case you'd be damn sure you had your story straight.

While I have you, could I trouble you for a cite on Amanda's sex contact list identifying Raffaele as an IV drug user?

I will dig it out for you, Sergei, you old sceptic, you!
 
You are putting words in my mouth. What is being discussed, is whether the crime was premeditated.

Several posters claim not. So we have the following potential scenario.

Rudy, walking past the cottage, perhaps whistling nonchalantly.

"Oh, look a very high wall. I know, I'll break into my friends' house, even though I know it's full of penniless students and a couple of trainee lawyers.

There's a really heavy boulder over there. I'll aim it at the nine foot high window, which looks like it's shuttered. Who cares if I can be seen by passing cars!

I'm a mate of Mignini, who pays me for information and I know the old raggazzo wants to reel in Amanda. So, I know, I'll nip in through the front door first, to ransack Filomena's room, so everyone will think it's staged and blame Amanda!

Gosh, I am so clever. I can even leave my DNA and shoeprints there as my old mate Mignini will see to it I get a short sentence in return for framing Amanda."


We-eeell.

No. The attempted burglary was premeditated. Throwing a rock is designed to elicit a response from anyone inside. If no response, the way is clear to burgle. Unfortunately, the strategy does not take into account the coming home of a resident later. Hence, an unpremeditated murder.

Burglars, on the whole, go out of their way not to get into a confrontation. It's bad for business. I've asked a few.

My own suspicion, which I really cannot prove, is that Guede did not want to get into a fight with Kercher, would have preferred an escape, but was challenged by her in a manner, which was sufficient to cause him to attack, restrain and ultimately kill her. This would appear to have aroused him.
 
Last edited:
Bill do you think when Amanda was writing about guys from whom she could possibly have contracted HIV when she mentioned Raf's extensive use she was referring to hash use? The only drug use that spreads HIV significantly is intravenous AFAIK. Do you know differently. At any rate it is a fair statement by a spiteful or quarrelsome woman.

Would you expect Raf to write about intravenous use in his book?
 
Last edited:
It apparently is the standard method of payment in Italy to use cash whenever possible. The nursery supposedly had thousands in cash. The rents were paid in cash. Perhaps this is a way of avoiding taxes. :boggled:

Rudi had a good idea that there would be 900-1200 Euro there and when no one appeared to be home he broke in. There is no solid evidence that the shutters were closed, the window was not easily visible from cars driving by. The rock was a little big but I don't what his selection was from the nearby rock store.
 
They should work out a way of having Benny Hill music play in the background.

Last time I read someone suggesting "Benny Hill music" it was on a German Forum and that someone suggested adding the Benny Hill soundtrack to the CSI videos of Dec 18th, 2007 played in fast forward mode :D
 
Last edited:
It apparently is the standard method of payment in Italy to use cash whenever possible. The nursery supposedly had thousands in cash. The rents were paid in cash. Perhaps this is a way of avoiding taxes. :boggled:

Rudi had a good idea that there would be 900-1200 Euro there and when no one appeared to be home he broke in. There is no solid evidence that the shutters were closed, the window was not easily visible from cars driving by. The rock was a little big but I don't what his selection was from the nearby rock store.

If that was the case, he would have ransacked each room in turn.

It was only Mez' money and property stolen.
 
Then he is either extraordinarily dumb or incredibly clever.

I believe the cottage has been burglarized a few other times since the murder as well, albeit I don't believe through the same window. I also note you have to mischaracterize reality in order to make your argument, i.e., referring to a rock as a "boulder", assuming anyone could see Rudy if he climbed through the window, describing the cottage as Rudy's "friend's house" (which it wasn't, although he had been there, but that doesn't help you because it just means he knew the surroundings, which again doesn't help you because, you know, it's nice for a burglar to break into a place he is familiar with). Oh, and he also burglarized the office a week before, so he kind of had an M.O.

When you get past your rather unlettered attempt at a witty creation of what would be going through Rudy's head, your post was pretty empty of any real substance.

But hey, maybe you're an expert in burglaries and can enlighten us all.
 
If that was the case, he would have ransacked each room in turn.

It was only Mez' money and property stolen.

Why would he? Maybe after you murder someone you try to get out of the place where you murdered someone really fast. When you argue, you should maybe vet what you're saying first before you make these assumptions.
 
If that was the case, he would have ransacked each room in turn.

It was only Mez' money and property stolen.
Who do you think opened the drawer in Laura Mezzetti's room?
dsc_0040.jpg
 
Who do you think opened the drawer in Laura Mezzetti's room?
[qimg]http://amandaknoxcase.com/wp-content/uploads/Crime%20Scene%20Photos%20November%202-3/dsc_0040.jpg[/qimg]

You don't understand, unless everything from the entire house was stolen, there was no burglary and AK and RS are guilty.
 
Then he is either extraordinarily dumb or incredibly clever.

Second-storey burglars like Rudy are often not the sharpest tack in the box.

Acc. to Judge Massei, Rudy was a lustful thug, who did not need any encouragment from anyone - much less AK or RS - to attack Meredith sexually.

Acc. to Judge Nencini, Rudy is a master burglar who out of professional-pride would not have gone in through Filomen's window. Acc. to Judge Nencini, the reason he gave why Rudy would not have staged a burglary that way, was because the Perguian cops would have immediately known it was Rudy's signature.

No matter - both Judge Massei and Judge Nencini are in the dust-bin, both annuled with the full exonerations of AK and RS on March 27, 2015. Perhpas now the Kerchers can get some real answers rather than the crap they've been fed for 7 1/2 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom