Grinder
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 10,033
I am really shocked that you guys in the States have had all of this censored.
It's common knowledge here.
There are three places it is common and it's not knowledge.
I am really shocked that you guys in the States have had all of this censored.
It's common knowledge here.
Police sources released the bank statements. It was about €300- every few days, over and on top of rent.
WHAT ARE YOU ALL DOING?Reeeeaaally? Please give us any sort of credible cite. Please nothing with a Capealadin comment.
Police sources released the bank statements. It was about €300- every few days, over and on top of rent.
The same court ppl here have said is thoroughly corrupt.
The same court ppl here have said is thoroughly corrupt.
WHAT ARE YOU ALL DOING?
Ignore the troll and it will go away: they always do.
Amanda was charged with transporting a knife, so presumably the courts agreed there was probable cause.
I personally think that Vixen is a sock puppet for Mach, or maybe selene, or Skeptical, or even harry rag.
Its style suggests that it is evil reincarnation of Mach, because I remember that Mach used to make outrageously insulting accusations about the conduct of AK and RS and their relationship with Rudy. There was no logical basis for making these statements, but they were made ONLY to insult AK and RS.
This Mach sock puppet is not interested in logical discourse or discussion: Its real aim is to insult and present false and unsubstantiated BS in the only forum that remains.
The only reason that Vixen is here is because there are no more news comments sections or PMF for him to make his intentionally false accusations and nonsense factoids that we have come to recognize over the last seven years.
If we are not responding to the haters in comment sections, why are we giving them a sanctuary here?
I think that we should ignore it, or get rid of it, or shun it.
They weren't large sums of money. Not even close. Money is relevant, I probably spend 3 or 4 times that when I'm traveling. And I don't even drink alcohol. And there is no evidence that Amanda had or has a drug habit. No drug tests, no eyewitnesses in Italy or the US. Why is it you would rather talk about innuendo instead of the fscts? Is it because the facts don't support your preconceived ideas?
The police did not test any of them for drugs.<snip>
Psychotropic drugs, for example, LSD, are not readily visible in the bloodstream or hair? As for cannabis, the pair admitted it. Some cannabis is extremely strong and sometimes laced with THC or even acid. When you buy any drug from a dealer you are recklessly taking a chance, for you don't know what it's been cut with.
Are you seriously suggesting the kids were drug free, except perhaps for a toke on a joint?
PS One policeman did say Amanda had body odour typical of a cocaine user.
She was consorting with a cocaine dealer.
After the murder, both Raf and Amanda avowed never to take drugs again.
Police sources? We can do better than that. Here are her bank statements. Now why don't you give a proper analysis:
http://www.amandaknox.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/2007-Knox_bank_record.pdf
Psychotropic drugs, for example, LSD, are not readily visible in the bloodstream or hair? As for cannabis, the pair admitted it. Some cannabis is extremely strong and sometimes laced with THC or even acid. When you buy any drug from a dealer you are recklessly taking a chance, for you don't know what it's been cut with.
Are you seriously suggesting the kids were drug free, except perhaps for a toke on a joint?
PS One policeman did say Amanda had body odour typical of a cocaine user.
She was consorting with a cocaine dealer.
After the murder, both Raf and Amanda avowed never to take drugs again.
How many keys to the downstairs flat were there? Can we be certain the keys on the hook or key rack were those that Meredith had? Why were they initially claimed to have been found in Amanda's room, IIUC?
These are exactly the sorts of fantasies that get promulgated on the anti-Amanda Knox cult sites you claim never to visit. Your recent effusion of posts, cheerfully leading posters here on a wild goose chase as they try to pin you down, is also characteristic of the style of longtime habitués of those sites.
In short, your mask is slipping, accompanied by your credibility.
It's only my theory.
Can this same camera-tracking technique be used to track the camera (and be used to I.D. its owner?) that took other photos such as the pink bathroom photos or photos of Amanda in Capanne Prison that were given to tabloids? Suppose it could, and it turns out to belong to officer N or prosecutor M. That would be worth knowing.
I am sure, for starters, that it would require that the specific camera used is a model that attaches an identifier in the digital image file and that the image file is then searchable on a public-access image site such as Flicker or TinEye.
Once the camera is identified, additional searches for other photos taken by the same camera might locate photos (with name or personal identifying details) that the owner/user has posted on Flicker and similar sites.
Romanelli in both phone calls urged Amanda to call Mez and then the police.